Strategic positioning of inventory review policies in alternative supply chain networks: An information-sharing paradigm perspective

International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 14-33

  Dev, Navin K ^a   Caprihan, Rahul ^a   Swami, Sanjeev ^a  

^a DAYALBAGH EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTE   (India)

Author keywords

discrete event simulation; information sharing; inventory review policy; supply chain network; Taguchi experimental design

Indexed keywords

EID: 84875222792     PISSN: 13675567     EISSN: 1469848X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13675567.2013.767324     Document Type: Review

References (35)

1. Aigbedo, H. 2004. Analyses of Parts Requirements Variance for a JIT Supply Chain. International Journal of Production Research, 42(2): 417-430. (doi:10.1080/00207540310001614178)
2. Ahire, S. L. and Schmidt, C. P. 1996. A Model for a Mixed Continuous-Periodic Review One Warehouse, N-Retailer Inventory System. European Journal of Operational Research, 92(1): 69-82. (doi:10.1016/0377-2217(94)00309-2)
3. Beamon, B. M. and Bermudo, J. M. 2000. A Hybrid Push/Pull Control Algorithm for Multi-stage, Multi-line Production Systems. Production Planning and Control, 11(4): 349-356. (doi:10.1080/095372800232072)
4. Beamon, B. M. and Chen, V. C. P. 2001. Performance Analysis of Conjoined Supply Chains. International Journal of Production Research, 39(14): 3195-3218. (doi:10.1080/00207540110053156)
5. Chopra, S. and Meindl, P. 2004. Supply Chain Management: Strategic, Planning and Operations, 2, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
6. Flores, R. G. and Wang, X. Z. 2002. A Multi-agent System for Chemical Supply Chain Simulation and Management Support. OR Spectrum, 24(3): 343-370. (doi:10.1007/s00291-002-0099-x)
7. Forrester, J. W. 1961. Industrial Dynamics, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8. Fox, M. S., Barbuceanu, M. and Teigen, R. 2000. Agent-Oriented Supply-Chain Management. International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems, 12(2/3): 165-188. (doi:10.1023/A:1008195614074)
9. Gjerdrum, J., Shah, N. and Papageorgiou, L. G. 2001. A Combined Optimization and Agent-Based Approach to Supply Chain Modeling and Performance Assessment. Production Planning and Control, 12(1): 81-88. (doi:10.1080/09537280150204013)
10. Huang, M., Ip, W. H. and Yung, K. L. 2007. Simulation Study Using System Dynamics for a CONWIP-Controlled Lamp Supply Chain. International Journal of Advance Manufacturing Technology, 32(1-2): 184-193. (doi:10.1007/s00170-005-0324-2)
11. Hussain, M. and Saber, H. 2012. Exploring the Bullwhip Effect Using Simulation and Taguchi Experimental Design. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 15(4): 231-249. (doi:10.1080/13675567.2012.710599)
12. Hwarng, H. B., Chong, C. S. P., Xie, N. and Burgess, T. F. 2005. Modelling a Complex Supply Chain: Understanding the Effect of Simplified Assumptions. International Journal of Production Research, 43(13): 2829-2872. (doi:10.1080/00207540500066812)
13. Jammernegg, W. and Reiner, G. 2007. Performance Improvement of Supply Chain Processes by Coordinated Inventory and Capacity Management. International Journal of Production Economics, 108(1-2): 183-190. (doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2006.12.047)
14. Kelton, W. D., Sadowski, R. P. and Swets, N. B. 2010. Simulation with Arena, 5, New York: McGraw-Hill.
15. Lau, J. S. K., Huang, G. Q. and Mak, K. L. 2004. Impact of Information Sharing on Inventory Replenishment in Divergent Supply Chains. International Journal of Production Research, 42(5): 919-941. (doi:10.1080/00207540310001628911)
16. Lee, H. L., Padmanabhan, P. and Whang, S. 1997. Information Distortion in Supply Chain: The Bullwhip Effect. Management Science, 43(4): 546-559. (doi:10.1287/mnsc.43.4.546)
17. Li, J., Sikora, R., Shaw, M. J. and Tan, G. W. 2006. A Strategic Analysis of Inter Organizational Information Sharing. Decision Support System, 42(1): 251-266. (doi:10.1016/j.dss.2004.12.003)
18. Lim, S. J., Jeong, S. J., Kim, K. S. and Park, M. W. 2006. A Simulation Approach for Production-Distribution Planning with Consideration Given to Replenishment Policies. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 27(5-6): 593-603. (doi:10.1007/s00170-004-2208-2)
19. Masuchun, W., Davis, S. and Patterson, J. W. 2004. Comparison of Push and Pull Control Strategies for Supply Network Management in a Make-to-Stock Environment. International Journal of Production Research, 42(20): 4401-4419. (doi:10.1080/00207540410001716543)
20. Olhager, J. and Persson, F. 2006. Simulating Production and Inventory Control System: A Learning Approach to Operational Excellence. Production Planning and Control, 17(2): 113-127. (doi:10.1080/09537280500223921)
21. Phadke, M. S. 1989. Quality Engineering Using Robust Design, 1, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall International.
22. Reddy, A. M. and Rajendran, C. 2005. A Simulation Study of Dynamic Order-up-to-Policies in Supply Chain with Non-stationary Customer Demand and Information Sharing. International Journal of Advance Manufacturing Technology, 25(9-10): 1029-1045. (doi:10.1007/s00170-003-1940-3)
23. Reiner, G. and Trcka, M. 2004. Customized Supply Chain Design: Problems and Alternatives for a Production Company in the Food Industry. A Simulation Base Analysis. International Journal of Production Economics, 89(2): 217-229. (doi:10.1016/S0925-5273(03)00054-9)
24. Rodríguez-Verjan, G. and Montoya-Torres, J. R. 2009. Measuring the Impact of Supplier-Customer Information Sharing on Production Scheduling. International Journal of Information Systems and Supply Chain Management, 2(2): 48-61. (doi:10.4018/jisscm.2009040104)
25. Ross, P. J. 1996. Taguchi Techniques for Quality Engineering, 2, New York: McGraw-Hill.
26. Shang, J. S., Li, S. and Tadikamalla, P. 2004. Operational Design of a Supply Chain System Using the Taguchi Method, Response Surface Methodology, Simulation, and Optimization. International Journal of Production Research, 42(18): 3823-3849. (doi:10.1080/00207540410001704050)
27. Simchi-Levi, D., Kaminsky, P. and Simchi-Levi, E. 2007. Designing and Managing the Supply Chain: Concepts, Strategies, and Case Studies, 3, Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
28. Strader, T. J., Lin, F. and Shaw, M. J. 1998. Information Infrastructure for Electronic Virtual Organization Management. Decision Support Systems, 23(1): 75-94. (doi:10.1016/S0167-9236(98)00037-2)
29. Umeda, S. and Zhang, F. 2006. Supply Chain Simulation: Generic Models and Application Examples. Production Planning and Control, 17(2): 155-166. (doi:10.1080/09537280500224028)
30. Venkateswaran, J. and Son, Y. J. 2004. Impact of Modeling Approximations in Supply Chain Analysis-An Experimental Study. International Journal of Production Research, 42(15): 2971-2992. (doi:10.1080/00207540410001688392)
31. Weitzman, R. and Rabinowitz, G. 2003. Sensitivity of 'Push' and 'Pull' Strategies to Information Updating Rate. International Journal of Production Research, 41(9): 2057-2074. (doi:10.1080/0020754031000075862)
32. Yee, S. T. 2005. Impact Analysis of Customized Demand Information Sharing on Supply Chain Performance. International Journal of Production Research, 43(16): 3353-3373. (doi:10.1080/00207540500095779)
33. Zanoni, S., Ferretti, I. and Tang, O. 2006. Cost Performance and Bullwhip Effect in a Hybrid Manufacturing and Remanufacturing System with Different Control Policies. International Journal of Production Research, 44(18-19): 3847-3862. (doi:10.1080/00207540600857375)
34. Zhang, C. and Zhang, C. 2007. Design and Simulation of Demand Information Sharing in a Supply Chain. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 15(1): 32-46. (doi:10.1016/j.simpat.2006.09.011)
35. Zhao, W. and Wang, Y. 2002. Coordination of Joint Pricing-Production Decisions in a Supply Chain. IIE Transactions, 34(8): 701-715. (doi:10.1023/A:1014972527002)