Bayesian parentage analysis with systematic accountability of genotyping error, missing data and false matching

Bioinformatics

Volumn 29, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 725-732

  Christie, Mark R ^a   Tennessen, Jacob A ^a   Blouin, Michael S ^a  

^a OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MICROSATELLITE DNA;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; GENE FREQUENCY; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; GENOTYPING TECHNIQUE; SALMON; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ANIMALS; BAYES THEOREM; GENE FREQUENCY; GENOTYPE; GENOTYPING TECHNIQUES; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; SALMON;

EID: 84875204811     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt039     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Akey,J.M. et al. (2010) Tracking footprints of artificial selection in the dog genome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107, 1160-1165.
2. Anderson,E.C. and Garza,J.C. (2006) The power of single-nucleotide polymorphisms for large-scale parentage inference. Genetics, 172, 2567-2582.
3. Araki,H. et al. (2007) Reproductive success of captive-bred steelhead trout in the wild: evaluation of three hatchery programs in the Hood river. Conserv. Biol., 21, 181-190.
4. Blouin,M.S. (2003) DNA-based methods for pedigree reconstruction and kinship analysis in natural populations. Trends Ecol. Evol., 18, 503-511.
5. Bonin,A. et al. (2004) How to track and assess genotyping errors in population genetics studies. Mol. Ecol., 13, 3261-3273.
6. Christie,M.R. (2010) Parentage in natural populations: novel methods to detect parent-offspring pairs in large data sets. Mol. Ecol. Resour., 10, 115-128.
7. Christie,M.R. et al. (2011) Who are the missing parents? Grandparentage analysis identifies multiple sources of gene flow into a wild population. Mol. Ecol., 20, 1263-1276.
8. Hadfield,J.D. et al. (2006) Towards unbiased parentage assignment: combining genetic, behavioural and spatial data in a Bayesian framework. Mol. Ecol., 15, 3715-3730.
9. Jamieson,A. and Taylor,S.S. (1997) Comparisons of three probability formulae for parentage exclusion. Anim. Genet., 28, 397-400.
10. Jones,A.G. and Ardren,W.R. (2003) Methods of parentage analysis in natural populations. Mol. Ecol., 12, 2511-2523.
11. Jones,A.G. et al. (2010) A practical guide to methods of parentage analysis. Mol. Ecol. Resour., 10, 6-30.
12. Kalinowski,S.T. et al. (2007) Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Mol. Ecol., 16, 1099-1106.
13. Lander,T.A. et al. (2011) Reconstruction of a beech population bottleneck using archival demographic information and Bayesian analysis of genetic data. Mol. Ecol., 20, 5182-5196.
14. Manichaikul,A. et al. (2010) Robust relationship inference in genome-wide association studies. Bioinformatics, 26, 2867-2873.
15. Marshall,T.C. et al. (1998) Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Mol. Ecol., 7, 639-655.
16. Olsen,J.B. et al. (2001) The aunt and uncle effect: an empirical evaluation of the confounding influence of full sibs of parents on pedigree reconstruction. J. Hered., 92, 243-247.
17. Pemberton,J.M. (2008) Wild pedigrees: the way forward. Proc. Biol. Sci., 275, 613-621.
18. Pompanon,F. et al. (2005) Genotyping errors: causes, consequences and solutions. Nat. Rev. Genet., 6, 847-859.
19. Rieseberg,L. et al. (2012) Editorial 2012.Mol. Ecol., 21, 1-22.
20. Saunders,I.W. et al. (2007) Estimating genotyping error rates from Mendelian errors in SNP array genotypes and their impact on inference. Genomics, 90, 291-296.
21. Slate,J. et al. (2000) A retrospective assessment of the accuracy of the paternity inference program CERVUS. Mol. Ecol., 9, 801-808.
22. Sokal,R.R. and Rohlf,F.J. (1994) Biometry, 3rd edn. W.H. Freeman, New York, USA.
23. van Oosterhout,C. et al. (2006) Estimation and adjustment of microsatellite null alleles in nonequilibrium populations. Mol. Ecol. Notes, 6, 255-256.
24. Vandeputte,M. et al. (2006) An evaluation of allowing for mismatches as a way to manage genotyping errors in parentage assignment by exclusion. Mol. Ecol. Notes, 6, 265-267.