Diagnostic imaging of trabecular bone microstructure for oral implants: A literature review

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology

Volumn 42, Issue 3, 2013, Pages

  Ibrahim, N ^a,b   Parsa, A ^a   Hassan, B ^a   Van Der Stelt, P ^a   Wismeijer, D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MALAYA   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

Cone beam CT; Dental implants; Microstructure

Indexed keywords

BONE DENSITY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; EVALUATION; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; JAW; METHODOLOGY; MICRO-COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPHY; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY; REVIEW; TOOTH IMPLANTATION;

ALVEOLAR PROCESS; BONE DENSITY; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; RADIOGRAPHY, PANORAMIC; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; X-RAY MICROTOMOGRAPHY;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84875170109     PISSN: 0250832X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20120075     Document Type: Review

References (61)

1. Siev?anen H, Kannus P, J?arvinen TLN. Bone quality: an empty term. PLoS Med 2007; 4: e27.
2. Compston J. Bone quality: What is it and how is it measured? Arq Bras Endocrinol Metab 2006; 50: 579-585.
3. Licata A. Bone density vs bone quality: What's a clinician to do? Cleve Clin J Med 2009; 76: 331-336.
4. Fyhrie DP. Summary - measuring "bone quality". J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 2005; 5: 318-320.
5. Sakka S, Coulthard P. Bone quality: a reality for the process of osseointegration. Implant Dent 2009; 18: 480-485.
6. Fanuscu MI, Chang TL. Three-dimensional morphometric analysis of human cadaver bone: microstructural data from maxilla and mandible. Clin Oral Impl Res 2004; 15: 213-218.
7. Minkin C, Marinho VC. Role of the osteoclast at the boneimplant interface. Adv Dent Res 1999; 13: 49-56.
8. M? uller R. Bone microarchitecture assessment: current and future trends. Osteoporos Int 2003; 14(Suppl.5): S89-S95.
9. Gomes de Oliveira RC, Leles CR, Lindh C, Ribeiro-Rotta RF. Bone tissue microarchitectural characteristics at dental implant sites. Part 1: Identification of clinical-related parameters. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012; 23: 981-986.
10. Wirth AJ, Goldhahn J, Flaig C, Arbenz P, M? uller R, van Lenthe GH. Implant stability is affected by local bone microstructural quality. Bone 2011; 49: 473-478.
11. DeTolla DH, Andreana S, Patra A, Buhite R, Comella B. Role of the finite element model in dental implants. J Oral Implantol 2000; 26: 77-81.
12. Yi WJ, Heo MS, Lee SS, Choi SC, Huh KH. Comparison of trabecular bone anisotropies based on fractal dimensions and mean intercept length determined by principal axes of inertia. Med Biol Eng Comput 2007; 45: 357-364.
13. Krug R, Burghardt AJ, Majumdar S, Link TM. High-resolution imaging techniques for the assessment of osteoporosis. Radiol Clin North Am 2010; 48: 601-621.
14. M? uller R, van Lenthe GH. Trabecular bone failure at the microstructural level. Curr Osteoporos Rep 2006; 4: 80-86.
15. Turkyilmaz I, McGlumphy EA. Influence of bone density on implant stability parameters and implant success: a retrospective clinical study. BMC Oral Health 2008; 8: 32.
16. Turkyilmaz I, Sennerby L, McGlumphy EA, T?oz?um TF. Biomechanical aspects of primary implant stability: a human cadaver study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2009; 11: 113-119.
17. Molly L. Bone density and primary stability in implant therapy. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006; 17: 124-135.
18. Gonzalez-Garcia R, Monje F. The reliability of cone-beam computed tomography to assess bone density at dental implant recipient sites: a histomorphometric analysis by micro-CT. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012 Jan 17. Epub ahead of print. doi: 10.1111/ j.1600-0501.2011.02390.x
19. White SC, Pharoah MJ. Oral radiology: principles and interpretation.5th edn. St Louis: Mosby; 2004.
20. Whaites E. Essentials of dental radiography and radiology. 3rd edn. London: Churchill Livingstone; 2007.
21. Couture RA, Whiting BR, Hildebolt CF, Dixon DA. Visibility of trabecular structures in oral radiographs. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003; 96: 764-771.
22. Ribeiro-Rotta RF, Lindh C, Pereira AC, Rohlin M. Ambiguity in bone tissue characteristics as presented in studies on dental implant planning and placement: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011; 22: 789-801.
23. Lindh C, Petersson A, Rohlin M. Assessment of the trabecular pattern before endosseous implant treatment: diagnostic outcome of periapical radiography in the mandible. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1996; 82: 335-343.
24. Aalam AA, Nowzari H, Krivitsky A. Functional restoration of implants on the day of surgical placement in the fully edentulous mandible: a case series. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2005; 7: 10-16.
25. Jonasson G, Jonasson G, Jonasson L, Kiliaridis S. Skeletal bone mineral density in relation to thickness, bone mass, and structure of the mandibular alveolar process in dentate men and women. Eur J Oral Sci 2007; 115: 117-123.
26. Lindh C, Horner K, Jonasson G, Olsson P, Rohlin M, Jacobs R, et al. The use of visual assessment of dental radiographs for identifying women at risk of having osteoporosis: the OSTEODENT project. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008; 106: 285-293.
27. Pham D, Jonasson G, Kiliaridis S. Assessment of trabecular pattern on periapical and panoramic radiographs: A pilot study. Acta Odontol Scand 2010; 68: 91-97.
28. Taguchi A, Suei Y, Ohtsuka M, Otani K, Tanimoto K, Ohtaki M. Usefulness of panoramic radiography in the diagnosis of postmenopausal osteoporosis in women. Width and morphology of inferior cortex of the mandible. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1996; 25: 263-267.
29. Watanabe PCA, Oliveira TM, Monteiro SAC, Iyomasa MM, Regalo SCH, Siessere S. Morphodigital study of the mandibular trabecular bone in panoramic radiographs. Int J Morphol 2007; 25: 875-880.
30. Bollen AM, Taguchi A, Hujoel PP, Hollender LG. Fractal dimension on dental radiographs. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2001; 30: 270-275.
31. Lofthag-Hansen S, Gr?ondahl K, Ekestubbe A. Cone-beam CT for preoperative implant planning in the posterior mandible: visibility of anatomic landmarks. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2009; 11: 246-255.
32. Sakakura CE, Morais JA, Loffredo LC, Scaf G. A survey of radiographic prescription in dental implant assessment. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2003; 32: 397-400.
33. Pothuaud L, Benhamou CL, Porion P, Lespessailles E, Harba R, Levitz P. Fractal dimension of trabecular bone projection texture is related to three-dimensional microarchitecture. J Bone Miner Res 2000; 15: 691-699.
34. S'anchez I, Uzc'ategui G. Fractals in dentistry. J Dent 2011; 39: 273-292.
35. Genant HK, Jiang Y. Advanced imaging assessment of bone quality. Ann NY Acad Sci 2006; 1068: 410-428.
36. Lespessailles E, Chappard C, Bonnet N, Benhamou CL. Imaging techniques for evaluating bone microarchitecture. Joint Bone Spine 2006; 73: 254-261.
37. Jiang Y, Zhao J, White DL, Genant HK. Micro CT and Micro MR imaging of 3D architecture of animal skeleton. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 2000; 1: 45-51.
38. Ito M. Recent progression in assessment of bone microstructure. Nihon Rinsho 2011;691233-691238.
39. Cho?el L, Last D, Duboeuf F, Seurin MJ, Lissac M, Briquet A, et al. Trabecular alveolar bone microarchitecture in the human mandible using high resolution magnetic resonance imaging. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004; 33: 77-182.
40. Sell CA, Masi JN, Burghardt A, Newitt D, Link TM, Majumdar S. Quantification of trabecular bone structure using magnetic resonance imaging at 3 Tesla-calibration studies using microcomputed tomography as a standard of reference. Calcif Tissue Int 2005; 76: 355-364.
41. Celenk P, Celenk C. Evaluation by quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of trabecular bone quality in mandible and cervical vertebrae. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010; 21: 409-413.
42. Issever AS, Link TM, Kentenich M, Rogalla P, Burghardt AJ, Kazakia GJ, et al. Assessment of trabecular bone structure using MDCT: comparison of 64- and 320-slice CT using HR-pQCT as the reference standard. Eur Radiol 2010; 20: 458-468.
43. Burghardt AJ, Link TM, Majumdar S. High-resolution computed tomography for clinical imaging of bone microarchitecture. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011; 469: 2179-2193.
44. Issever AS, Link TM, Kentenich M, Rogalla P, Schwieger K, Huber MB, et al. Trabecular bone structure analysis in the osteoporotic spine using a clinical in vivo setup for 64-slice MDCT imaging: comparison to micro CT imaging and micro FE modelling. J Bone Miner Res 2009; 24: 1628-1637.
45. Naitoh M, Aimiya H, Hirukawa A, Ariji E. Morphometric analysis of mandibular trabecular bone using cone beam computed tomography: an in vitro study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010; 25: 1093-1098.
46. Naitoh M, Hirukawa A, Katsumata A, Ariji E. Prospective study to estimate mandibular cancellous bone density using large-volume cone-beam computed tomography. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010; 21: 1309-1313.
47. Araki K, Okano T. The effect of surrounding conditions on pixel value of cone beam computed tomography. Clin Oral Impl Res 2011 November 17. Epub ahead of print. doi: 10.1111/j.1600- 0501.2011.02373.x
48. Liu XS, Zhang XH, Sekhon KK, Adams MF, McMahon DJ, Bilezikian JP, et al. High-Resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography can assess microstructural and mechanical properties of human distal tibial bone. J Bone Miner Res 2010; 25: 746-756.
49. MacNeil JA, Boyd SL. Accuracy of high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography for measurement of bone quality. Med Eng Phys 2007; 29: 1096-1105.
50. Yip G, Schneider P, Roberts EW. Micro-computed tomography: high resolution imaging of bone and implants in three dimensions. Semin Orthod 2004; 10: 174-187.
51. Swain MV, Xue J. State of the art of micro CT applications in dental research. Int J Oral Sci 2009; 1: 177-188.
52. Hatcher DC. Operational principles for cone-beam computed tomography. J Am Dent Assoc 2010; 141(Suppl.3):3S-6S.
53. Al-Rawi B, Hassan B, Vandenberge B, Jacobs R. Accuracy assessment of three-dimensional surface reconstructions of teeth from cone beam computed tomography scans. J Oral Rehabil 2010; 37: 352-358.
54. Kau CH, Bozic M, English J, Lee R, Bussa H, Ellis RK. Conebeam computed tomography of the maxillofacial region - an update. Int J Med Robot 2009; 5: 366-380.
55. Liang X, Jacobs R, Hassan B, Li L, Pauwels R, Corpas L, et al. A comparative evaluation of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and multi-slice CT (MSCT) Part I. on subjective image quality. Eur J Radiol 2010; 75: 265-269.
56. De Vos W, Casselman J, Swennen GR. Cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) imaging of the oral and maxillofacial region: a systematic review of the literature. Int J Oral and Maxillofac Surg 2009; 38: 609-625.
57. Corpas LS, Jacobs R, Quirynen M, Huang Y, Naert I, Duyck J. Peri-implant bone tissue assessment by comparing the outcome of intra-oral radiograph and cone beam computed tomography analyses to the histological standard. Clin Oral Impl Res 2011; 22: 492-499.
58. Liu SM, Zhang ZY, Li JP, Liu DG, Ma XC. A study of trabecular bone structure in the mandibular condyle of healthy young people by cone beam computed tomography. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 2007; 42: 357-360.
59. Loubele M, Jacobs R, Maes F, Denis K, White S, Coudyzer W, et al. Image quality vs radiation dose of four cone beam computed tomography scanners. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2008; 37: 309-318.
60. Schulze R, Heil U, Gross D, Bruellmann DD, Dranischnikow E, Schwanecke U, et al. Artefacts in CBCT: a review. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2011; 40: 265-273.
61. M? uller R, Koller B, Hildebrand T, Laib A, Gianolini S, R?uegsegger P. Resolution dependency of microstructural properties of cancellous bone based on three-dimensional m-tomography. Technol Health Care 1996; 4: 113-119.