Trabecular alveolar bone microarchitecture in the human mandible using high resolution magnetic resonance imaging

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 177-182

  Choel L ^a,d   Last, D ^b   Duboeuf, F ^c   Seurin, M J ^a   Lissac, M ^a   Briguet, A ^a   Guillot, G ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LYON 1   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SACLAY   (France)

^c EDOUARD HERRIOT HOSPITAL   (France)

^d Université Claude Bernard ESCPE ^*  (France)

Author keywords

Alveolar process; Bone density; Mandible; Microarchitecture; MRI; Trabecular bone

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; BONE DENSITY; CADAVER; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTITION; EDENTULOUSNESS; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE PROCESSING; INCISOR; JAW; MALE; MANDIBLE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MOLAR TOOTH; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATHOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PREMOLAR TOOTH; RADIODENSITOMETRY; SEX DIFFERENCE; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALVEOLAR PROCESS; BICUSPID; BONE DENSITY; CADAVER; DENSITOMETRY, X-RAY; DENTITION; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; INCISOR; JAW, EDENTULOUS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MANDIBLE; MIDDLE AGED; MOLAR; SEX FACTORS;

EID: 7944230545     PISSN: 0250832X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/42933309     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Steflik DE, Noel C, McBrayer C, Labre FT, Parr GR, Sisk AL, et al. Histologic observations of bone remodeling adjacent to endosteal dental implants. J Oral Implantol 1995; 21: 96-106.
2. Misch CE, Qu Z, Bidez MW. Mechanical properties of trabecular bone in the human mandible: implications for dental implant treatment planning and surgical placement. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1999; 57: 700-706.
3. Parfitt AM. Trabecular bone architecture in the pathogenesis and prevention of fracture. Am J Med 1987; 82 (Suppl 1B):68-72.
4. Majumdar S, Kothari M, Augat P, Newitt DC, Link TM, Lin JC, et al. High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging: three-dimensional trabecular bone architecture and biomechanical properties. Bone 1998; 22: 445-454.
5. Boivin G, Meunier PJ. The degree of mineralization of bone tissue measured by computerized quantitative contact microradiography. Calcif Tissue Int 2002; 70: 503-511.
6. Whitehouse WJ. The quantitative morphology of anisotropic trabecular bone. J Microsc 1974; 101: 153-168.
7. Simmons CA, Hipp JA. Method-based differences in the automated analysis of three-dimensional morphology of trabecular bone. J Bone Miner Res 1997; 12: 942-947.
8. Parfitt AM, Drezner MK, Glorieux FH, Kanis JA, Malluche H, Meunier PJ, et al. Bone histomorphometry: standardization of nomenclature, symbol and units. J Bone Miner Res 1987; 2: 595-610.
9. Parfitt AM, Mathews CHE, Villanueva AR, Kleerekoper, Frame B, Rao DS. Relationship between surface, volume and thickness of iliac trabecular bone in aging and in osteoporosis: implications for the microanatomic and cellular mechanisms of bone loss. J Clin Invest 1983; 72: 1396-1409.
10. Serra J. Morphological parameters and set models. In: Serra J (ed). Image analysis and mathematical morphology. New York: Academic Press; 1982, pp 127-162.
11. Vogel HJ. Digital unbiased estimation of the Euler Poincaré Characteristic in different dimensions. Acta Stereol 1997; 16: 97-104.
12. Pothuaud L, Van Rietbergen R, Mosekilde L, Beuf O, Levitz P, Benhamou CL, et al. Combination of topological parameters and bone volume fraction better predicts the mechanical properties of trabecular bone. J Biomech 2002; 35: 1091-1099.
13. Majumdar S. A review of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of trabecular bone micro-architecture: contribution to the prediction of biomechanical properties and fracture prevalence. Technol Health Care 1998; 6: 321-327.
14. Genant HK, Majumdar S. High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging of trabecular bone structure. Osteoporosis Int 1997; 7: S135-S139.
15. Antoniadis T, Scarpelli JP, Ruaud JP, Gonord P, Guillot G. Bone labeling on micro-magnetic resonance images. Medical Image Analysis 1998; 3: 119-128.
16. Majumdar S, Newitt D, Mathur A, Osman D, Gies A, Chiu E, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of trabecular bone structure in the distal radius: relationship with x-ray tomographic microscopy and biomechanics. Osteoporosis Int 1996; 6: 376-385.
17. Ouyang X, Selby K, Lang P, Engelke K, Klifa C, Fan B, et al. High resolution magnetic resonance imaging of the calcaneus: age-related changes in the trabecular structure and comparison with dual X-ray absorptiometry measurements. Calcif Tissue Int 1997; 60: 139-147.
18. Majumdar S, Genant HK, Grampp S, Jergas MD, Newitt DC, Gies AA. Analysis of the trabecular bone structure in the distal radius using high resolution MRI. Eur Radiol 1994; 4: 517-524.
19. Antich PP, Mason RP, McColl R, Zernwech J, Pak CYC. Trabecular architecture studies by 3D MRI microscopy in bone biopsies. J Bone Miner Res 1994; 9: 327 (Abstr B392).
20. Hipp JA, Jansujwicz A, Simmons CA, Snyder BD. Trabecular bone morphology from micro-magnetic resonance imaging. J Bone Miner Res 1996; 11: 286-292.
21. Esposito M, Hirsch J-M, Lekholm U, Thomsen P. Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants. (I) Success criteria and epidemiology. Eur J Oral Sci 1998; 106: 527-551.
22. Esposito M, Hirsch J-M, Lekholm U, Thomsen P. Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants. (II) Etiopathogenesis. Eur J Oral Sci 1998; 106: 721-764.
23. Turner CH. On Wolff's law of trabecular architecture. J Biomech 1992; 25: 1-9.