Adjustment for continuous confounders: An example of how to prevent residual confounding

CMAJ. Canadian Medical Association Journal

Volumn 185, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 401-406

  Groenwold, Rolf H H ^a,b   Klungel, Olaf H ^a,b   Altman, Douglas G ^c   Van Der Graaf, Yolanda ^b   Hoes, Arno W ^b   Moons, Karel G M ^b  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COHORT ANALYSIS; CONFOUNDING VARIABLE; HEALTH CARE; HUMAN; INFLUENZA VACCINATION; MEDICAL LITERATURE; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PREDICTION; PROGNOSIS; REVIEW; RISK FACTOR; SMOKING; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; VASCULAR DISEASE;

EID: 84875164183     PISSN: 08203946     EISSN: 14882329     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.120592     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Royston P, Altman DG, Sauerbrei W. Dichotomizing continuous predictors in multiple regression: a bad idea. Stat Med 2006; 25: 127-41.
2. Steyerberg EW. Clinical prediction models: a practical approach to development, validation and updating. New York: Springer; 2009.
3. Harrell FE Jr. Regression modelling strategies: with applications to linear models, logistic regression, and survival analysis. New York: Springer; 2001. p. 16-26.
4. Royston P, Moons KG, Altman DG, et al. Prognosis and prognostic research: developing a prognostic model. BMJ 2009; 338: b604.
5. Groenwold RHH, van Deursen AM, Hoes AW, et al. Poor quality of reporting confounding bias in observational intervention studies: a systematic review. Ann Epidemiol 2008;18:746-51.
6. Müllner M, Matthews H, Altman DG. Reporting on statistical methods to adjust for confounding: a cross-sectional survey. Ann Intern Med 2002;136:122-6.
7. Benedetti A, Abrahamowicz M. Using generalized additive models to reduce residual confounding. Stat Med 2004;23:3781-801.
8. Brenner H, Blettner M. Controlling for continuous confounders in epidemiologic research. Epidemiology 1997;8:429-34.
9. Becher H. The concept of residual confounding in regression models and some applications. Stat Med 1992;11:1747-58.
10. Greenland S. Introduction to regression models. In: Rothman KJ, Greenland S, Lash TL, editors. Modern epidemiology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia (PA): Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008. p. 381-417.
11. Royston P, Sauerbrei W. Building multivariable regression models with continuous covariates in clinical epidemiology-with an emphasis on fractional polynomials. Methods Inf Med 2005; 44: 561-71.
12. Royston P, Sauerbrei W. Multivariable model-building: a pragmatic approach to regression analysis based on fractional polynomials for modelling continuous variables. Hoboken (NJ): Wiley; 2008.
13. Altman DG, Royston P. The cost of dichotomising continuous variables. BMJ 2006;332:1080.
14. Groenwold RHH, Hoes AW, Hak E. Impact of influenza vaccination on mortality risk among elderly. Eur Respir J 2009; 34: 56-62.
15. Simons PCG, Algra A, van de Laak MF, et al.; SMART study Group. Second Manifestations of Arterial disease (SMART) study: rationale and design. Eur J Epidemiol 1999;15:773-81.
16. R Development Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna (Austria): R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2011.
17. Cochran WG. The effectiveness of adjustment by subclassification in removing bias in observational studies. Biometrics 1968; 24: 295-313.
18. Ambler G, Benner A. mfp: Multivariable Fractional Polynomials. 2010. Available: http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=mfp (accessed 2012 Nov. 5).
19. Harrell FE Jr. Hmisc: Harrell Miscellaneous. 2012. Available: http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=Hmisc (accessed 2012 Nov. 5).
20. Klungel OH, Martens EP, Psaty BM, et al. Methods to assess intended effects of drug treatment in observational studies are reviewed. J Clin Epidemiol 2004;57:1223-31.
21. Austin PC, Brunner LJ. Inflation of the type I error rate when a continuous confounding variable is categorized in logistic regression analyses. Stat Med 2004;23:1159-78.