Reporting on statistical methods to adjust for confounding: A cross-sectional survey

Annals of Internal Medicine

Volumn 136, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 122-126

  Müllner, Marcus ^a   Matthews, Hugh ^a   Altman, Douglas G ^a  

^a MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EPIDEMIOLOGY; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLIC HEALTH; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS;

EID: 0037080407     PISSN: 00034819     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-136-2-200201150-00009     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. The environment and disease: Association or causation?
2. Adjustment for covariate imbalance
3. Social class, health behaviour, and mortality among men and women in eastern Finland
4. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals International Committee of Medical Journal Editors
5. How can impact factors be improved?
6. Multicenter study of surfactant (beractant) use in the treatment of term infants with severe respiratory failure
7. Randomized trial of trovafloxacin and ofloxacin for single-dose therapy of gonorrhea
8. Balsalazide is more effective and better tolerated than mesalamine in the treatment of acute ulcerative colitis
9. Changes in breathing pattern and respiratory muscle performance parameters during difficult weaning
10. Logistic regression models used in medical research are poorly presented
11. Logistic regression models in obstetrics and gynecology literature
12. Transforming data
13. Review of survival analyses published in cancer journals
14. A potential pitfall in control of covariates in epidemiologic studies
15. Human error: Models and management
16. Effect on the quality of peer review of blinding reviewers and asking them to sign their reports: A randomized controlled trial
17. Statistical reviewing policies of medical journals: Caveat lector?