Erratum: Generation and characterization of a novel nouse embryonic stem cell line with a dynamic reporter of nanog expression (PLOS ONE (2013) 8, 3 (e59928) DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059928);Generation and Characterization of a Novel Mouse Embryonic Stem Cell Line with a Dynamic Reporter of Nanog Expression

PLoS ONE

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2013, Pages

  Abranches, Elsa ^a,b   Bekman, Evguenia ^a   Henrique, Domingos ^a,b  

^a INSTITUTO DE MEDICINA MOLECULAR   (Portugal)

^b CHAMPALIMAUD CENTRE FOR THE UNKNOWN   (Portugal)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FLUORESCENT DYE; MESSENGER RNA; OCTAMER TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR 4; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR NANOG; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR SOX2; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; VNP FLUORESCENT PROTEIN;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL ARTIFICIAL CHROMOSOME; CELL CULTURE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL GROWTH; CELL HETEROGENEITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATIONAL STUDY; EMBRYO; EMBRYONIC STEM CELL; GENE EXPRESSION; HALF LIFE TIME; IN VITRO STUDY; MOUSE; NANOG GENE; NONHUMAN; OCT4 GENE; PLURIPOTENT STEM CELL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN FUNCTION; REGULATORY MECHANISM; REPORTER GENE; SOX2 GENE; TRANSGENE;

EID: 84875117561     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101028     Document Type: Erratum

References (40)

1. Potten CS, Loeffler M, (1990) Stem cells: attributes, cycles, spirals, pitfalls and uncertainties. Lessons for and from the crypt. Development 110: 1001-1020.
2. Morrison SJ, Shah NM, Anderson DJ, (1997) Regulatory mechanisms in stem cell biology. Cell 88: 287-298.
3. Martin GR, (1981) Isolation of a pluripotent cell line from early mouse embryos cultured in medium conditioned by teratocarcinoma stem cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 78: 7634-7638.
4. Evans MJ, Kaufman MH, (1981) Establishment in culture of pluripotential cells from mouse embryos. Nature 292: 154-156.
5. Smith AG, (2001) Embryo-derived stem cells: of mice and men. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 17: 435-462.
6. Ying Q-L, Wray J, Nichols J, Batlle-Morera L, Doble B, et al. (2008) The ground state of embryonic stem cell self-renewal. Nature 453: 519-523.
7. Silva J, Smith A, (2008) Capturing pluripotency. Cell 132: 532-536.
8. Niwa H, (2007) How is pluripotency determined and maintained? Development 134: 635-646.
9. Young RA, (2011) Control of the embryonic stem cell state. Cell 144: 940-954.
10. Jaenisch R, Young R, (2008) Stem cells, the molecular circuitry of pluripotency and nuclear reprogramming. Cell 132: 567-582.
11. Thomson M, Liu SJ, Zou L-N, Smith Z, Meissner A, et al. (2011) Pluripotency factors in embryonic stem cells regulate differentiation into germ layers. Cell 145: 875-889.
12. Loh KM, Lim B, (2011) A precarious balance: pluripotency factors as lineage specifiers. Cell Stem Cell 8: 363-369.
13. Ishigaki Y, Li X, Serin G, Maquat LE, (2001) Evidence for a pioneer round of mRNA translation: mRNAs subject to nonsense-mediated decay in mammalian cells are bound by CBP80 and CBP20. Cell 106: 607-617.
14. Toyooka Y, Shimosato D, Murakami K, Takahashi K, Niwa H, (2008) Identification and characterization of subpopulations in undifferentiated ES cell culture. Development 135: 909-918.
15. Singh AM, Hamazaki T, Hankowski KE, Terada N, (2007) A heterogeneous expression pattern for Nanog in embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells 25: 2534-2542.
16. Chambers I, Silva J, Colby D, Nichols J, Nijmeijer B, et al. (2007) Nanog safeguards pluripotency and mediates germline development. Nature 450: 1230-1234.
17. Osorno R, Chambers I, (2011) Transcription factor heterogeneity and epiblast pluripotency. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 366: 2230-2237.
18. Mitsui K, Tokuzawa Y, Itoh H, Segawa K, Murakami M, et al. (2003) The homeoprotein Nanog is required for maintenance of pluripotency in mouse epiblast and ES cells. Cell 113: 631-642.
19. Chambers I, Colby D, Robertson M, Nichols J, Lee S, et al. (2003) Functional expression cloning of Nanog, a pluripotency sustaining factor in embryonic stem cells. Cell 113: 643-655.
20. Copeland NG, Jenkins NA, Court DL, (2001) Recombineering: a powerful new tool for mouse functional genomics. Nat Rev Genet 2: 769-779.
21. Nagoshi E, Saini C, Bauer C, Laroche T, Naef F, et al. (2004) Circadian gene expression in individual fibroblasts: cell-autonomous and self-sustained oscillators pass time to daughter cells. Cell 119: 693-705.
22. Vilas-Boas F, Fior R, Swedlow JR, Storey KG, Henrique D, (2011) A novel reporter of notch signalling indicates regulated and random notch activation during vertebrate neurogenesis. BMC Biol 9: 58.
23. Abranches E, Silva M, Pradier L, Schulz H, Hummel O, et al. (2009) Neural differentiation of embryonic stem cells in vitro: a road map to neurogenesis in the embryo. PLoS ONE 4: e6286.
24. Kalmar T, Lim C, Hayward P, Muñoz-Descalzo S, Nichols J, et al. (2009) Regulated fluctuations in nanog expression mediate cell fate decisions in embryonic stem cells. PLoS Biol 7: e1000149.
25. Kunath T, Saba-El-Leil MK, Almousailleakh M, Wray J, Meloche S, et al. (2007) FGF stimulation of the Erk1/2 signalling cascade triggers transition of pluripotent embryonic stem cells from self-renewal to lineage commitment. Development 134: 2895-2902.
26. Stavridis MP, Lunn JS, Collins BJ, Storey KG, (2007) A discrete period of FGF-induced Erk1/2 signalling is required for vertebrate neural specification. Development 134: 2889-2894.
27. Eblaghie MC, Lunn JS, Dickinson RJ, Munsterberg AE, Sanz-Ezquerro JJ, et al. (2003) Negative feedback regulation of FGF signaling levels by Pyst1/MKP3 in chick embryos. Curr Biol 13: 1009-1018.
28. Kawakami Y, Rodriguez-Leon J, Koth CM, Buscher D, Itoh T, et al. (2003) MKP3 mediates the cellular response to FGF8 signalling in the vertebrate limb. Nat Cell Biol 5: 513-519.
29. Rathjen J, Lake JA, Bettess MD, Washington JM, Chapman G, et al. (1999) Formation of a primitive ectoderm like cell population, EPL cells, from ES cells in response to biologically derived factors. J Cell Sci 112 (Pt 5): 601-612.
30. Soncin F, Ward CM, (2011) The Function of E-Cadherin in Stem Cell Pluripotency and Self-Renewal. Genes 2: 229-259.
31. Wang Y, Mah N, Prigione A, Wolfrum K, Andrade-Navarro MA, et al. (2010) A Transcriptional Roadmap to the Induction of Pluripotency in Somatic Cells. Stem cell reviews.
32. Teo AKK, Arnold SJ, Trotter MWB, Brown S, Ang LT, et al. (2011) Pluripotency factors regulate definitive endoderm specification through eomesodermin. Genes & development.
33. Plusa B, Piliszek A, Frankenberg S, Artus J, Hadjantonakis AK, (2008) Distinct sequential cell behaviours direct primitive endoderm formation in the mouse blastocyst. Development 135: 3081-3091.
34. Chazaud C, Yamanaka Y, Pawson T, Rossant J, (2006) Early lineage segregation between epiblast and primitive endoderm in mouse blastocysts through the Grb2-MAPK pathway. Developmental Cell 10: 615-624.
35. Wray J, Kalkan T, Smith AG, (2010) The ground state of pluripotency. Biochem Soc Trans 38: 1027-1032.
36. Chan W, Costantino N, Li R, Lee SC, Su Q, et al. (2007) A recombineering based approach for high-throughput conditional knockout targeting vector construction. Nucleic Acids Res 35: e64.
37. Pfaffl MW, (2001) A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res 29: e45.
38. Zhou P, (2004) Determining protein half-lives. Methods Mol Biol 284: 67-77.
39. Sobell HM, (1985) Actinomycin and DNA transcription. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 82: 5328-5331.
40. Akeson EC, Davisson MT (2001) Mitotic chromosome preparations from mouse cells for karyotyping. Curr Protoc Hum Genet Chapter 4: Unit4 10.