Getting the Help We Need

Journal of Educational Measurement

Volumn 50, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 84-90

  Haertel, Edward ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84875082266     PISSN: 00220655     EISSN: 17453984     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/jedm.12002     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Bransford, J. D., & Schwartz, D. L. (1999). Rethinking transfer: A simple proposal with multiple implications. Review of Educational Research, 24, 61-100.
2. Camilli, G. (2006). Test fairness. In R. L. Brennan (Ed.), Educational measurement (4th ed., pp. 221-256). Westport, CT: American Council on Education and Praeger.
3. Cannell, J. J. (1988). Nationally normed elementary achievement testing in America's public schools: How all 50 states are above the national average. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 7(2), 5-9.
4. Cole, N. S. (1973). Bias in selection. Journal of Educational Measurement, 10, 237-255.
5. Cole, N. S., & Moss, P. A. (1989). Bias in test use. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 201-219). New York, NY: American Council on Education and Macmillan.
6. Cronbach, L. J. (1976). Equity in selection: Where psychometrics and political philosophy meet. Journal of Educational Measurement, 13, 31-41.
7. Cronbach, L. J., & Gleser, G. C. (1965). Psychological tests and personnel decisions. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
8. Diamond, J. B., & Cooper, K. (2007). The uses of testing data in urban elementary schools: some lessons from Chicago. In P. A. Moss (Ed.), Evidence and decision making (106th Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education) (Part 1, pp. 241-263). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
9. Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41, 1040-1048.
10. Gee, James P. (2008). A sociocultural perspective on opportunity to learn. In P. A. Moss, D. C. Pullin, J. P. Gee, E. H. Haertel, & L. J. Young (Eds.), Assessment, equity, and opportunity to learn (pp. 76-108). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
11. Gipps, C. V. (1994). Beyond testing: Towards a theory of educational assessment. London, UK: Falmer Press.
12. Goldman, S. V., & McDermott, R. (1987). The culture of competition in American schools. In G. D. Spindler (Ed.), Education and cultural process: Anthropological approaches (pp. 282-299). Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
13. Hill, C. (1994). Testing and assessment: An applied linguistics perspective. Educational Assessment, 2(3), 179-212.
14. Jacob, B. A. (2001). Getting tough? The impact of high school graduation exams. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23(2), 99-121.
15. Klein, S. P., Hamilton, L. S., McCaffrey, D. F., & Stecher, B. M. (2000). What do test scores in Texas tell us? (RAND Issue Paper No. IP-202). Santa Monica, CA: The RAND Corporation.
16. Koretz, D. (1988). Arriving at Lake Wobegon: Are standardized tests exaggerating achievement and distorting instruction? American Educator, 12(2), 8-15, 46-52.
17. Koretz, D. (2005). Alignment, high stakes, and the inflation of test scores. In J. L. Herman & E. H. Haertel (Eds.), Uses and misuses of data for educational accountability and improvement (The 104th yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education) (Part 2, pp. 99-118). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
18. Koretz, D., & Barron, S. I. (1998). The validity of gains on the Kentucky Instructional Results Information System (KIRIS) (RAND Report No. MR-1014-EDU). Santa Monica, CA: The RAND Corporation.
19. Koretz, D., Linn, R. L., Dunbar, S. B., & Shepard, L. A. (1991, April). The effects of high-stakes testing on achievement: Preliminary findings about generalization across tests. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
20. Mehan, H. (1978). Structuring school structure. Harvard Educational Review, 48, 32-64.
21. Mehan, H. (2008). A sociological perspective on opportunity to learn and assessment. In P. A. Moss, D. C. Pullin, J. P. Gee, E. H. Haertel, & L. J. Young (Eds.), Assessment, equity, and opportunity to learn (pp. 42-75). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
22. Messick, S. (1980). Test validity and the ethics of assessment. American Psychologist, 35, 1012-1027.
23. Messick, S. (1981). Evidence and ethics in the evaluation of tests. Educational Researcher, 10(9), 9-20.
24. Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 13-103). New York, NY: American Council on Education and Macmillan.
25. Mislevy, R. J. (1993). Foundations of a new test theory. In N. Frederiksen, R. J. Mislevy, & I. Bejar (Eds.) Test theory for a new generation of tests (pp. 19-39). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
26. Moss, P. A. (1998). The role of consequences in validity theory. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 17(2), 6-12.
27. National Research Council (2011). Incentives and test-based accountability in education. Committee on Incentives and Test-Based Accountability in Public Education, M. Hout & S. W. Elliott (Eds.) Board on Testing and Assessment, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
28. Pullin, D. (2005). When one size does not fit all-The special challenges of accountability testing for students with disabilities. In J. L. Herman & E. H. Haertel (Eds.), Uses and misuses of data for educational accountability and improvement (The 104th yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education) (Part 2, pp. 199-222). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
29. Resnick, L. B., & Resnick, D. P. (1992). Assessing the thinking curriculum: New tools for educational reform. In B. R. Gifford & M. C. O'Connor (Eds.), Changing assessments: Alternative views of aptitude, achievement and instruction (pp. 37-75). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic.
30. Shepard, L. A. (1990). Inflated test score gains: Is the problem old norms or teaching the test? Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 9(3), 15-22.
31. Smith, E. R., Tyler, R. W., & the Evaluation Staff. (1942). Appraising and recording student progress (The Adventure in American Education Series, Vol. 3). New York, NY: Harper & Bros.
32. Smith, M. L., & Rottenberg, C. (1991). Unintended consequences of external testing in elementary schools. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 10(4), 7-11.
33. Steele, C. M. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52, 613-629.
34. Wiggins, G. P. (1993). Assessing student performance: Exploring the purpose and limits of testing. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
35. Young, M. (1958). The rise of the meritocracy 1870-2033: An essay on education and equality. London, UK: Thames & Hudson.