The uses of testing data in urban elementary schools: Some lessons from Chicago

Teachers College Record

Volumn 109, Issue 13, 2007, Pages 241-263

  Diamond, John B ^a   Cooper, Kristy ^a  

^a HARVARD GRADUATE SCHOOL OF EDUCATION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84859871080     PISSN: 01614681     EISSN: 14679620     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Anagnostopoulos, D. (2006). "Real students" and "true demotes": Ending social promotion and the moral ordering of urban high schools. American Educational Research Journal, 43(1), 5-42.
2. Bidwell, C.E. (2001). Analyzing schools as organizations: Long-term permanence and short-term change. Sociology of Education, 1 (Extra Issue), 100-114.
3. Booher-Jennings, J. (2005). Below the bubble: "Educational triage" and the Texas accountability system. American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 231-268.
4. Boudett, K.P., City, E., & Murnane, R. (Eds.). (2005). Data Wise: A step-by-step guide to using assessment results to improve teaching and learning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
5. Bryk, A.S. (2003). No Child Left Behind, Chicago style. In P.E. Peterson & M.R. West (Eds.), No Child Left Behind? The politics and practice of school accountability (pp. 242-268). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
6. Chicago School Reform Act. P.A. 85-1418. An Act in relation to school reform in cities over 500, 000. Approved December 12, 1988.
7. Clotfelter, C., & Ladd, H. (1996). Recognizing and rewarding success in public schools. In H. Ladd (Ed.), Holding schools accountable: Performance-based reform in education (pp. 23-64). Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
8. Coburn, C.E. (2004). Beyond decoupling: Rethinking the relationship between the institutional environment and the classroom. Sociology of Education, 77(3), 211-244.
9. Coburn, C.E., & Talbert, J.E. (2006). Conceptions of evidence-based practice in school districts: Mapping the terrain. American Journal of Education, 112(4), 469-495.
10. Coleman, J.S., Schneider, B., Plank, S., Schiller, K.S., Shouse, R., Wang, H., et al. (Eds.). (1997). Redesigning American education. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
11. Diamond, J.B. (2006). Where the rubber meets the road: Rethinking the connection between high-stakes testing policy and classroom practice. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, Montreal, Canada.
12. Diamond, J.B. (forthcoming). Cultivating high expectations in an urban elementary school: The case of Kelly School. In J.P. Spillane & J.B. Diamond (Eds.), Distributed leadership in practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
13. Diamond, J.B., & Spillane, J.P. (2004). High-stakes accountability in urban elementary schools: Challenging or reproducing inequality? Teachers College Record, 106(6), 1140-1171.
14. Hess, G.A. (2000). Changes in students' achievement in Illinois and Chicago, 1990-2000. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
15. Jacob, B.A. (2003). A closer look at achievement gains under high-stakes testing in Chicago. In P.E. Peterson & M.R. West (Eds.), No Child Left Behind? The politics and practice of school accountability (pp. 269-291). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
16. McDill, E.L., Natriello, G., & Pallas, A.M. (1986). A population at risk: Potential consequences of tougher school standards for student dropouts. American Journal of Education, 94(2), 135-181.
17. McNeil, L. (2000). Contradictions of reform: Educational costs of standardized testing. New York: Routledge.
18. Rentner, D.S., Scott, C., Kober, N., Chudowsky, N., Chudowsky, V, Joftus, S., et al. (2006). From the capitol to the classroom: Year 4 of the No Child Left Behind Act. Washington, DC: Center on Education Policy.
19. Roscigno, V.J. (2000). Family/school inequality and African-American/Hispanic achievement. Social Problems, 47(2), 266-290.
20. Sherer, J. (forthcoming) The practice of leadership in mathematics and language arts: The Adams case. In J.P. Spillane & J.B. Diamond (Eds.), Distributed leadership in practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
21. Shouse, R. (1997). Academic press, sense of community, and student achievement. In J.S. Coleman, B. Schneider, S. Plank, K.S. Schiller, R.C. Shouse, & H. Wang (Eds.), Redesigning American education. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
22. Spillane, J.P. (2000). Cognition and policy implementation: District policymakers and the reform of mathematics education. Cognition and Instruction, 18(2), 141-179.
23. Spillane, J.P. (2004). Standards deviation: How schools misunderstand education policy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
24. Spillane, J.P. (2006). Distributed leadership. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
25. Spillane, J.P., & Diamond, J.B. (Eds.). (forthcoming). Distributed leadership in practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
26. Spillane, J.P., Diamond, J.B., Walker, L.J., Halverson, R., & Jita, L. (2001). Urban school leadership for elementary science instruction: Identifying and activating resources in an undervalued school subject. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(8), 918-940.
27. Spillane, J.P., Diamond, J.B., Burch, P., Hallett, T., Jita, L., & Zoltners, J. (2002). Managing in the middle: School leaders and the enactment of accountability policy. Educational Policy, 16(5), 731-763.
28. Valenzuela, A. (Ed.). (2004). Leaving children behind: How "Texas style" accountability fails Latino youth. Albany: State University of New York Press.
29. Weick, K.E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.