Comparison of the efficacies of I-gel™ and LMA-ProSeal™ for airway management in pediatric patients

Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences

Volumn 43, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 208-213

  Tokgöz, Orhan ^a   Tüfek, Adnan ^a   Beyaz, Serbülent Gökhan ^b   Yüksel, Mustafa Uǧur ^a   Çelik, Feyzi ^a   Aycan, Ilker Öngüç ^a   Güzel, Abdulmenap ^a  

^a DICLE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b SAKARYA UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

I gel ; LMA ProSeal ; Supraglottic airway device

Indexed keywords

AIRWAY LEAKAGE PRESSURE; ANESTHESIA INDUCTION; ARTICLE; BRONCHOSPASM; CHILD; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; COUGHING; DEVICE SAFETY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INCIDENCE; INFANT; LARYNX SPASM; LIP DISEASE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL DEVICE; NAUSEA AND VOMITING; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RESPIRATION CONTROL; RESPIRATORY TRACT PARAMETERS; SCHOOL CHILD; SCORING SYSTEM; SORE THROAT; SUPRAGLOTTIC AIRWAY DEVICE;

EID: 84875072482     PISSN: 13000144     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3906/sag-1206-30     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Nolan JP, Deakin CD, Soar J, Bottiger BW, Smith G, European Resuscitation Council. European Resuscitation Council guidelines for resuscitation 2005. Section 4. Adult advanced life support. Resuscitation 2005; 67: S39-86.
2. Katz SH, Falk JL. Misplaced endotracheal tubes by paramedics in an urban emergency medical services system. Ann Emerg Med 2001; 37: 32-7.
3. Holm-Knudsen RJ, Rasmussen LS. Paediatric airway management: basic aspects. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2009; 53: 1-9.
4. Beylacq L, Bordes M, Semjen F, Cros AM. The I-gel, a singleuse supraglottic airway device with a non-inflatable cuff and an esophageal vent: an observational study in children. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2009; 53: 376-9.
5. Brimacombe J. Analysis of 1500 laryngeal mask uses by one anaesthetist in adults undergoing routine anaesthesia. Anaesthesia 1996; 51: 76-80.
6. Lopez-Gil M, Brimacombe J, Alvarez M. Safety and efficacy of the laryngeal mask airway. A prospective survey of 1400 children. Anaesthesia 1996; 51: 969-72.
7. Sahin A, Tufek A, Cingu AK, Caca I, Tokgoz O, Balsak S. The effect of I-gel airway on intraocular pressure in pediatric patients who received sevoflurane or desflurane during strabismus surgery. Paediatr Anaesth 2012; 22: 772-5.
8. Karabi{dotless}yi{dotless}k L, Öncül S, Emmez G. The effects of the Cobra perilaryngeal airway on intraocular pressure. Turk J Med Sci 2012; 42: 667-73.
9. Barker P, Langton JA, Murphy PJ, Rowbotham DJ. Regurgitation of gastric contents during general anaesthesia using the laryngeal mask airway. Br J Anaesth 1992; 69: 314-5.
10. Schmidbauer W, Bercker S, Volk T, Bogusch G, Mager G, Kerner T. Oesophageal seal of the novel supralaryngeal airway device I-Gel in comparison with the laryngeal mask airways Classic and ProSeal using a cadaver model. Br J Anaesth 2009; 102: 135-9.
11. Endo K, Okabe Y, Maruyama Y, Tsukatani T, Furukawa M. Bilateral vocal cord paralysis caused by laryngeal mask airway. Am J Otolaryngol 2007; 28: 126-9.
12. Wong JG, Heaney M, Chambers NA, Erb TO, von Ungern-Sternberg BS. Impact of laryngeal mask airway cuff pressures on the incidence of sore throat in children. Paediatr Anaesth 2009; 19: 464-9.
13. Brimacombe J, Holyoake L, Keller C, Brimacombe N, Scully M, Barry J et al. Pharyngolaryngeal, neck, and jaw discomfort after anesthesia with the face mask and laryngeal mask airway at high and low cuff volumes in males and females. Anesthesiology 2000; 93: 26-31.
14. Levitan RM, Kinkle WC. Initial anatomic investigations of the I-gel airway: a novel supraglottic airway without inflatable cuff. Anaesthesia 2005; 60: 1022-6.
15. Francksen H, Renner J, Hanss R, Scholz J, Doerges V, Bein B. A comparison of the i-gel with the LMA-Unique in nonparalysed anaesthetised adult patients. Anaesthesia 2009; 64: 1118-24.
16. Shin WJ, Cheong YS, Yang HS, Nishiyama T. The supraglottic airway I-gel in comparison with ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and classic laryngeal mask airway in anaesthetized patients. Eur J Anaesthesiol; 27: 598-601.
17. Janakiraman C, Chethan DB, Wilkes AR, Stacey MR, Goodwin N. A randomised crossover trial comparing the i-gel supraglottic airway and classic laryngeal mask airway. Anaesthesia 2009; 64: 674-8.
18. Lee JR, Kim MS, Kim JT, Byon HJ, Park YH, Kim HS et al. A randomised trial comparing the i-gel (TM) with the LMA Classic (TM) in children. Anaesthesia 2012; 67: 606-11.
19. Theiler LG, Kleine-Brueggeney M, Luepold B, Stucki F, Seiler S, Urwyler N et al. Performance of the pediatric-sized i-gel compared with the Ambu AuraOnce laryngeal mask in anesthetized and ventilated children. Anesthesiology 2011; 115: 102-10.
20. Park C, Bahk JH, Ahn WS, Do SH, Lee KH. The laryngeal mask airway in infants and children. Can J Anaesth 2001; 48: 413-7.
21. Beringer RM, Kelly F, Cook TM, Nolan J, Hardy R, Simpson T et al. A cohort evaluation of the paediatric i-gel(™) airway during anaesthesia in 120 children. Anaesthesia 2011; 66: 1121-6.
22. Keller C, Brimacombe JR, Keller K, Morris R. Comparison of four methods for assessing airway sealing pressure with the laryngeal mask airway in adult patients. Br J Anaesth 1999; 82: 286-7.
23. Keller C, Brimacombe J, Puhringer F. A fibreoptic scoring system to assess the position of laryngeal mask airway devices. Interobserver variability and a comparison between the standard, flexible and intubating laryngeal mask airways. Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther 2000; 35: 692-4.
24. Goldmann K, Jakob C. Size 2 ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: a randomized, crossover investigation with the standard laryngeal mask airway in paediatric patients. Br J Anaesth 2005; 94: 385-9.
25. Goldmann K, Jakob C. A randomized crossover comparison of the size 2 1/2 laryngeal mask airway ProSeal versus laryngeal mask airway-Classic in pediatric patients. Anesth Analg 2005; 100: 1605-10.
26. Goldmann K, Roettger C, Wulf H. The size 1(1/2) ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in infants: a randomized, crossover investigation with the Classic laryngeal mask airway. Anesth Analg 2006; 102: 405-10.
27. Jackson KM, Cook TM. Evaluation of four airway training manikins as patient simulators for the insertion of eight types of supraglottic airway devices. Anaesthesia 2007; 62: 388-93.
28. Goyal R, Henderson DA, Chu N, Longo LD. Ovine middle cerebral artery characterization and quantification of ultrastructure and other features: changes with development. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2012; 302: R433-45.
29. Shimbori H, Ono K, Miwa T, Morimura N, Noguchi M, Hiroki K. Comparison of the LMA-ProSeal and LMA-Classic in children. Br J Anaesth 2004; 93: 528-31.
30. Richez B, Saltel L, Banchereau F, Torrielli R, Cros AM. A new single use supraglottic airway device with a noninflatable cuff and an esophageal vent: an observational study of the i-gel. Anesth Analg 2008; 106: 1137-9, table of contents.
31. Gibbison B, Cook TM, Seller C. Case series: Protection from aspiration and failure of protection from aspiration with the i-gel airway. Br J Anaesth 2008; 100: 415-7.
32. Keller C, Brimacombe J, Kleinsasser A, Loeckinger A. Does the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway prevent aspiration of regurgitated fluid? Anesth Analg 2000; 91: 1017-20.
33. Brimacombe JR, Berry A. The incidence of aspiration associated with the laryngeal mask airway: a meta-analysis of published literature. J Clin Anesth 1995; 7: 297-305.
34. Abukawa Y, Hiroki K, Ozaki M. Initial experience of the i-gel supraglottic airway by the residents in pediatric patients. J Anesth 2012; 26: 357-61.
35. Brimacombe J, Berry A. A proposed fiber-optic scoring system to standardize the assessment of laryngeal mask airway position. Anesth Analg 1993; 76: 457.