Initial experience of the i-gel supraglottic airway by the residents in pediatric patients

Journal of Anesthesia

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 357-361

  Abukawa, Yukako ^a   Hiroki, Koichi ^a,b   Ozaki, Makoto ^a  

^a TOKYO WOMEN'S MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b KANAGAWA CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER   (Japan)

Author keywords

Airway device; I gel; Laryngeal mask; Pediatric general anesthesia

Indexed keywords

FENTANYL; MIDAZOLAM; NITROUS OXIDE; PROPOFOL; SEVOFLURANE;

ARTICLE; BODY WEIGHT; CHILD; CONTROLLED STUDY; COUGHING; DEVICE SAFETY; DYSPHONIA; ENDOLEAK; EQUIPMENT; FEMALE; FIBEROSCOPE; HUMAN; HYPOXIA; I GEL AIRWAY DEVICE; INFANT; INFORMED CONSENT; LARYNGEAL MASK; LARYNX SPASM; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PARENTAL CONSENT; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; RESIDENT; SCHOOL CHILD; STOMACH TUBE; SUPINE POSITION; TIDAL VOLUME;

ADOLESCENT; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT; INTERNSHIP AND RESIDENCY; INTUBATION, INTRATRACHEAL; LARYNGEAL MASKS; MALE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84864934453     PISSN: 09138668     EISSN: 14388359     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00540-011-1322-1     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Jeon YT, Na HS, Park SH, Oh AY, Park HP, Yun MJ, Kim JH, Hwang JW. Insertion of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway is more successful with the 90 degrees rotation technique. Can J Anaesth. 2010;57(3):211-5.
2. Lopez-Gil M, Brimacombe J, Barragan L, Keller C. Bougieguided insertion of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway has higher first attempt success rate than the digital technique in children. Br J Anaesth. 2006;96(2):238-41
3. Teoh CY, Lim FS. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in children: a comparison between two insertion techniques. Paediatr Anaesth. 2008;18(2):119-24
4. Lopez-Gil M, Brimacombe J, Garcia G. A randomized non-crossover study comparing the ProSeal and Classic laryngeal mask airway in anaesthetized children. Br J Anaesth. 2005;95(6):827-30
5. Shimbori H, Ono K, Miwa T, Morimura N, Noguchi M, Hiroki K. Comparison of the LMA-ProSeal and LMA-Classic in children. Br J Anaesth. 2004;93(4):528-31
6. Inagawa G, Okuda K, Miwa T, Hiroki K. Higher airway seal does not imply adequate positioning of laryngeal mask airways in paediatric patients. Paediatr Anaesth. 2002;12(4):322-6.
7. Von Ungern-Sternberg BS, Wallace CJ, Sticks S, Erb TO, Chambers NA. Fibreoptic assessment of paediatric sized laryngeal mask airways. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2010;38(1):50-4.
8. Kelly F, Sale S, Bayley G, Cook T, Stoddart P, White M. A cohort evaluation of the pediatric ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in 100 children. Paediatr Anaesth. 2008;18(10):947-51
9. Bagshaw O. The size 1.5 laryngeal mask airway (LMA) in paediatric anaesthetic practice. Paediatr Anaesth. 2002;12(5):420-3.
10. Goldmann K, Jakob C. Size 2 ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: a randomized, crossover investigation with the standard laryngeal mask airway in paediatric patients. Br J Anaesth. 2005;94(3):385-9.
11. Lardner DR, Cox RG, Ewen A, Dickinson D. Comparison of laryngeal mask airway (LMA)-Proseal and the LMA-Classic in ventilated children receiving neuromuscular blockade. Can J Anaesth. 2008;55(1):29-35
12. Beylacq L, Bordes M, Semjen F, Cros AM. The I-gel, a singleuse supraglottic airway device with a non-inflatable cuff and an esophageal vent: an observational study in children. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2009;53(3):376-9.
13. Sinha A, Sharma B, Sood J. ProSeal as an alternative to endotracheal intubation in pediatric laparoscopy. Paediatr Anaesth. 2007;17(4):327-32
14. Theiler LG, Kleine-Brueggeney M, Luepold B, Stucki F, Seiler S, Urwyler N, Greif R. Performance of the pediatric-sized i-gel compared with the Ambu AuraOnce laryngeal mask in anesthetized and ventilated children. Anesthesiology. 2011;115(1):102-10.