What inhibits authors to self-archive in Open Access repositories? A Malaysian case

Information Development

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 24-35

  Singeh, Feria Wirba ^a   Abrizah, A ^a   Karim, Noor Harun Abdul ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MALAYA   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

academic authors; institutional repositories; Malaysia; Open Access; self archiving; universities

Indexed keywords

EID: 84875068573     PISSN: 02666669     EISSN: 17416469     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0266666912450450     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Abrizah A.Piloting an institutional repository at a research-intensive university: Strategies for content recruitment and the role of the library.World Digital Libraries. 2010;3 (1): 23-29.
2. Abrizah A.The cautious faculty: Their awareness and attitudes towards institutional repositories.Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science. 2009;14 (2): 17-37.
3. AllenJ (2005) Interdisciplinary differences in attitudes towards deposit in institutional repositories. Master's thesis. Manchester Metropolitan University. Available at: http://eprints.rclis.org/bitstream/10760/6957/1/FULLTEXT.pdf(Accessed 7 Feb 2010).
4. Bernius S,Hanauske M,König W.Open access models and their implications for the players on the scientific publishing market.Economic Analysis and Policy. 2009;39 (1):.
5. Björk B-C,Welling P,Laakso M,Majlender P,Hedlund T,Gudnason G.Open access to the scientific journal literature: situation 2009.PLoS ONE. 2010;5 (6):.
6. Budapest Open Access Initiative (2001) Available at: http://www.soros.org/openaccess(Accessed 17 June 2010).
7. Supporting and enhancing scholarship in the digital age: The role of open access institutional repository.Canadian Journal of Communication. 2004;29 (3): 277-300.
8. Chan DLH,Kwok CSY,Yip SKF.Changing roles of reference librarians: the case of the HKUST Institutional Repository.Reference Services Review. 2005;33 (3): 268-282.
9. Creaser C,Fry J,Greenwood H,Oppenheim C,Probets S,Spezi V,White S.Authors' awareness and attitudes toward open access repositories.New Review of Academic Librarianship. 2010;:145-161.
10. CrowR (2002) The case for institutional repositories: a SPARC position paper. Available at: http://www.arl.org/sparc/IR/ir.html. (Accessed 26 April 2011).
11. Davis PM,Conollay MJL.Institutional repositories: evaluating the non-use of Cornell University's installation of dspace.D-Lib Magazine. 2007;13 ((3/4)):.
12. DeoghuriaSRoyS (2007) Open access: what scientists think? A survey of researcher's attitude towards open access. ICSD-2007. Available at: http://drtc.isibang.ac.in/bitstream/1849/314/1/081_P32_swapan_deoghuria_formatted.pdf(Accessed 28 Sept 2010).
13. Dulle FW,Minish-Majanja MK,Cloete LM.Factors influencing the adoption of open access scholarly communication in Tanzanian public universities. Paper presented at World Library and Information Congress: 76th IFLA General Conference and Assembly; 2010Gothenburg, Sweden; 2010.
14. Ferreira M,Baptista AA,Rodrigues E,Saraiva R.Carrots and sticks: some ideas on how to create a successful institutional repository.D-Lib Magazine. 2008;14 (2):.
15. Foster NF,Gibbons S.Understanding faculty to improve content recruitment for institutional repositories.D-Lib Magazine. 2005;11 (1):.
16. Gadd E,Oppenheim C,Probets S.The intellectual property rights issues facing self-archiving.D-lib Magazine. 2003; (9):.
17. Gravetter FJ,Forzano L-ABResearch methods for the behavioral sciences. Gardners Books; 2008:.
18. Guterman L.Harvard faculty adopts open-access requirement.Chronicle of Higher Education. 2008;:.
19. Hajjem C,Harnad S,Gingras Y.Ten-year cross-disciplinary comparison of the growth of Open Access and how it increases research citation impact.IEEE Data Engineering Bulletin. 2005;28 (4): 39-47.
20. Harnad S.,McGovern N.Institutional repository success is dependent upon mandates.Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2009;35 (4): 27-31.
21. Hey J.Metadata issues for e-prints: experiences from setting up an institutional repository. Paper presented at the ePrints UK Workshop; 2004Ashmolean Museum Oxford; 2004.
22. Jantz RC,Wilson MC.Institutional repositories: faculty deposits, marketing, and the reform of scholarly communication.The Journal of Academic Librarianship. 2008;34 (3): 186-195.
23. Kim J.Motivations of faculty self-archiving in institutional repositories.Journal of Academic Librarianshi. 2011;37 (3): 246-254.
24. Kiran K,Chia Y.Open access initiatives in academic libraries: Challenge to the user. Paper presented at the World Library and Information Congress: 75th IFLA General Conference and Assembly; 2009Milan, Italy; 2009.
25. Linde P,Björklund C,Eriksson Jand Svensson A.Self-archiving in practice: what do the researchers say and is there any pain alleviation?. Paper presented at 13th International Conference on Electronic Publishing: Rethinking Electronic Publishing: Innovation in Communication Paradigms and Technologies; 2009Milan, Italy; 2009.
26. MannFWalterB, Hess T and Wigand RF (2008) Open access publishing in science: why it is highly appreciated but rarely used. Available at: http://openaccessstudy.com/Mann_et_al_2008_Open_Access_Publishing_in_Science.pdf(Accessed 7 Feb 2011).
27. McCulloch E.Taking stock of open access: Progress and issues.Library Review. 2006;55 (6):.
28. MillerRM (2006) Readers' attitudes to self-archiving in the UK. Napier University, Edinburgh. Masters dissertation thesis. Available at: http://www.edessa.co.uk/Dissertation/self-archiving.pdf(Accessed 16 April 2010).
29. Pinfield S.A mandate to self-archive? The role of open access institutional repositories.Serials. 2005;18 (1): 30-34.
30. Pickton M,McKnight C.Research students and the Loughborough Institutional Respository.Journal of Librarianship and Information Science. 2006;38 (4): 203-219.
31. Prosser D.Institutional repositories and Open Access: The future of scholarly communication.Information Services and Use. 2003;23 (2): 167-170.
32. Rowlands I.,Nicholas D.The changing scholarly communication landscape: an international survey of senior researchers.Learned Publishing. 2006;19 (1): 31-55.
33. Sale A.The acquisition of open access research articles.First Monday. 2006;11 (9):.
34. Salo D.Innkeeper at the roach motel.Library Trends. 2008;57 (2): 98-123.
35. Singeh FW,Abrizah A,Karim NHA.Malaysian authors' acceptance to self-archive in institutional repositories: towards a unified view.The Electronic Library. 2013;31 (1):.
36. Swan A.Open Access for Indian scholarship.Journal of Library and Information Technology. 2008;28 (1): 15-24.
37. Swan A,Brown S.Authors and open access publishing.Learned Publishing. 2004;17 (3): 219-224.
38. SwanABrownS (2005) Open access self-archiving: An author study. Technical Report, Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC), UK FE and HE funding councils. http://cogprints.org/4385/Available at: http://cogprints.org/4385/. (Accessed 28 Sept 2009).
39. Van Westrienen G,Lynch C.Academic institutional repositories: Deployment status in 13 nations as of mid 2005.D-Lib Magazine. 2005;11 (9): 1082-9873.
40. Watson S.Authors' attitudes to, and awareness and use of, a university institutional repository.Serials: The Journal for the Serials Community. 2007;20 (3): 225-230.
41. Westell M.Institutional repositories: proposed indicators of success.Library Hi Tech. 2006;24 (2): 211-226.
42. Xia J,Sun L.Assessment of self-archiving in institutional repositories: depositorship and full-text availability.Serials Review. 2007;33 (1): 14-21.
43. Zainab AN.Open access repositories and journals for visibility. Malaysian.Journal of Library & Information Science. 2010;15 (3): 97-119.