Open access repositories and journals for visibility: Implications for Malaysian libraries

Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 97-119

  Zainab, A N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MALAYA   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

Digital repositories; Institutional repositories; Open access journals; Visibility

Indexed keywords

EID: 78650256770     PISSN: 13946234     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Abrizah A. 2009. The cautious faculty: their awareness and attitudes towards institutional repositories, Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, Vol.14, no.2: 17-37.
2. Agerbæk, A. and Nielsen, K. 2010, Factors in which Influence the Impact Cycle. ScieCominfo, Vol.6, no.1. 3p. Online. Available at: http://www.sciecom.org/ojs/index.php/sciecominfo/article/viewFile/3549/3123.
3. Antelman, K. 2004. Do Open-Access Articles Have a Greater Research. College and Research Libraries, Vol.65, no.5: 372-382.
4. Aguillo, I.F., Ortega, J.L., Fernández, M., Utrilla, A.M. 2010. Indicators for a webometric Ranking of Repositories. Scientometrics, Vol.82, no.3: 477-486
5. Bailey, Charles W. 2006. and libraries (preprint 1/11/2006). Available at http://www.digital-scholarship.org/cwb/OALibraries2.pdf.
6. Berlin Declaration on to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities, 23 October, 2003. Available at: http://oa.mpg.de/openaccess-berlin/berlin_declaration.pdf.
7. Brinkman, W. 2002. Brinkman outlines priorities, challenges for APS in 2002, APS News Online. Available at http://www.aps.org/apsnews/0102/010208.html.
8. Craig, I. D., Plume, A. M., McVeigh, M. E., Pringle, J., & Amin, M. 2007. Do Articles Have Greater Citation Impact? A critical review of the literature. Journal of Informetrics, Vol.1, no.3: 239-248.
9. Crow, R. 2002. The case for institutional repositories: a SPARC position paper. Available at: http:////www.arl.org/sparc/IR/ir.html.
10. DOAJ - Directory of Journals, 2010, Lund University Libraries. Available at: http://www.doaj.org/.
11. Eysenbach, Gunther. 2006. Citation advantage of articles. Plos Biology, Vol. 4, no.5: E157. Available at http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pbio.0040157.
12. Gadd, E., Oppenheim, Charles and Probets, S. 2003. The intellectual property rights issues facing self-archiving: key findings of the RoMEO project, D-Mib Magazine, Vol. 9, no.9 September. Available at: http://www.dlib.org/dlib/september03/gadd/09gadd.html.
13. Giglia, Elena. 2010. The impact factor of journals: data and trends. Paper presented at the 14th International Conference on Electronic Publishing, Helsinki, 16-18 June, 17-39. Available at http://dhanken.shh.fi/dspace/bitstream/10227/599/72/2giglia.pdf.
14. Ginsparg, P. 1994. First steps towards electronic research communication. Computers in Physics, Vol.8, no.4:390-396.
15. Ginsparg, P. 1996. Winners and losers in the global research village. Paper presented at the Conference on Electronic Publishing in Science, Paris, UNESCO, 10-23 February 1996. Available at: http://xxx.lanl.gov/blurb/pg96unesco.thml.
16. Ginsparg, P. 2002. Can peer review be better focused? Science and Technology Libraries, Vol.22, no.3/4: 5-18.
17. Harnad, S. 2003. Eprints: electronic preprints and post-prints, In: Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science. Marcel-Dekker, 6p. Available at: http://222.ecs.soton.ac.uk.
18. Hitchcock, Steve. 2003. Explore open archives: core meta list of eprint archives. ARL bimonthly report, (227) April. Available at: http://opcit.eprints.org/explorearchives.shtml. Access date: 7.7.2010.
19. Hitchcock, Steve, 2004. The effect of and downloads (bib) on citation impact: a bibliography of studies. Open Citation Project, updated June 2010. Available at: http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html.
20. Hoon, Esther and Van der Graaf, Maurits. 2006. Copyright issues in research journals. D-Lib Magazines, Vol. 12, no. 2. Available at: http://www.dlib.org/dlib/february06/vandergraaf/02vandergraaf.html.
21. Kling, Rob, Spector, Lisa and McKim, Geoff. 2002. The guild model, Journal of Electronic Publishing, Vol.8, no.1: 16p.
22. OpenDOAR: Directory of repositories. University of Nottingham, 2006-2010. Available at: http://www.opendoar.org/.
23. Open source software directory. by Jeroen Verhoectx. Available at: http://www.opensourcesoftwaredirectory.com/.
24. Lawrence, Steve. 2001. Free online availability substantially increases a paper's impact, Nature, No.411: 521(31 May).
25. MacKenzie Smith, Mary Barton, Mick Bass, Margret Branschofsky, Greg McClellan, Dave Stuve, Robert Tansley, and Julie Harford Walker, 2003. DSpace: An Open Source Dynamic Digital Repository, D-Lib Magazine, Vol. 9, no.1. Available at: http://www.dlib.org/dlib/january03/smith/01smith.html.
26. McVeigh, Marie E. 2004. journals in the ISI citation databases: analysis of impact factor and citation factors. Thomsen Corporation. Available at: http://science.thomsonreuters.com/m/pdfs/openaccesscitations2.pdf.
27. Nielsen, Anders Agerbaek Kjoller. 2010. Factors in which influence the impact cycle. Sciecominfor, No.1. Online. Available at: http://www.sciecom.org/ojs/index.php:sciecominfo/article/viewFile/3549/3123.
28. Ranking Web of World Repositories, 10 July 2010. Cymetrics laboratory, Spain. Available at: http://repositories.webometrics.info/about.html2004-2010. access date: 7.7.2010.
29. Registry of Registry. 2005-2010. Tim Brody. University of Southampton. Available at: http://roar.eprints.org/.
30. Rowland, Ian and Nicholas, Dave. 2005. New Journal publishing model: an international study of senior researchers. A CIBER report for the Publishers Association and the International Association of STM Publishers, 64p.
31. Savage, Lou. 1991. The Journal of the International Academy of Hospitality Research, The Public-Access Computer Systems Review, Vol.2, no.1: 54-66, Available at: http://info.lib.uh.edu/pr/v2/n1/savage.2n1.
32. Staples, T., Wayland R., and Payette, S. 2003. The Fedora Project: An Open-source Digital Object Repository Management System. D-Lib Magazine, Vol. 9, no. 2. Available at: http://www.dlib.org/dlib/april03/staples/04staples.html
33. Suber, Peter. 2007. Open Access overview: focusing on Open Access to peer-reviewed research articles and their preprints. News, 2007. Available at: http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/overview.htm.
34. Suber, Peter. A very brief introduction to Open Access, News, 29 Dec 2004. Available at: http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/brief.htm.
35. Suber, Peter. 2003. Removing the barriers to research: an introduction to librarians. College & Research Libraries News Vol.64: 92-94, 113. Available at: http://www.doaj.org/.;http://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/3715477/suber_crln.html?sequence=5.
36. Swan, A. 2010. The citation advantage: Studies and results to date. Truro, UK:Key Perspectives Ltd, 17 p. Available at: http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/18516/.
37. Testa, James and McVeigh, Marie E. 2004. Impact of journals: a citation study from Thomson ISI. Thomson Corporation, Available at http://www.thomsonscientific.jp/event/oal/impact-oa-journals.pdf.
38. Thornton Staples, Ross Wayland, and Sandra Payette,2003. The Fedora Project: An Open-Source Digital Object Repository Management System, D-Lib Magazine, Vol. 9, no. 4, http://www.dlib.org/dlib/april03/staples/04staples.html.
39. Van Westrienen, G. and Lynch, C.A. 2005. Academic institutional repositories: Deployment status in 13 nations as of mid 2005 D-Lib Magazine, Vol. 11. Available at: doi:10.1045/september2005-westrienen
40. Ware, Mark. 2004. Universities' own electronic repositories yet to impact on Open Access, Nature, 7 September. 7p. Available at: http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/accessdebate/4.html.
41. Zainab, A.N., Abrizah, A, Hilmi M.R. 2009. What a Digital Library of Malay Manuscripts Should Support: An Exploratory Needs Analysis. Libri, Vol.59 no. 4, 275-289.