Choice, Rating, and Ranking: Framing Effects with Different Response Modes

Journal of Behavioral Decision Making

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 109-117

  Kühberger, Anton ^a   Gradl, Patricia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SALZBURG   (Austria)

Author keywords

Choice; Framing; Judgment; Response mode; Risk

Indexed keywords

EID: 84875055052     PISSN: 08943257     EISSN: 10990771     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bdm.764     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Frisch, B. (1993). Reasons for framing effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 54, 399-429.
2. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1984). Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist, 39, 341-350.
3. Kühberger, A. (1995). The framing of decisions: A new look at old problems. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 62, 230-240.
4. Kühberger, A. (1997). Theoretical conceptions of framing effects in risky decisions. In R. Ranyard, W. R. Crozier, & O. Svenson (Eds.), Decision making: Cognitive models and explanations (pp. 128-144). London: Routledge.
5. Kühberger, A. (1998). The influence of framing on risky decisions: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 75, 23-55.
6. Kühberger, A., & Tanner, C. (2010). Risky choice framing: Task versions and a comparison of prospect theory and fuzzy-trace theory. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 23, 314-329.
7. Kühberger, A., Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M., & Perner, J. (1999). The effects of framing, reflection, probability, and payoff on risk preference in choice tasks. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 78, 204-231.
8. Levin, I. P., Johnson, R. D., Deldin, P. J., Carstens, L. M., Cressey, L. J., & Davis, C. R. (1986). Framing effects in decisions with completely and incompletely described alternatives. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 38, 8-64.
9. Levin, I. P., Schneider, S., & Gaeth, G. (1998). All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76, 149-188.
10. Levin, I. P., Snyder, M. A., & Chapman, D. P. (1989). The interaction of experiential and situational factors and gender in a simulated risky decision-making task. The Journal of Psychology, 122, 173-181.
11. Lichtenstein, S., & Slovic, P. (1971). Reversals of preference between bids and choices in gambling decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 89, 46-55.
12. Mandel, D. R. (2001). Gain-loss framing and choice: Separating outcome formulations from descriptor formulations. Organizational Behavior and Human Choice Processes, 85, 56-76.
13. McKenzie, C. R. (2004). Framing effects in inference tasks-and why they are normatively defensible. Memory and Cognition, 32, 874-885.
14. McKenzie, C. R. & Nelson, J. D. (2003). What a speaker's choice of frame reveals: Reference points, frame selection, and framing effects. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 10, 596-602.
15. Montgomery, H., Selart, M., Gärling, T., & Lindberg, E. (1994). The judgment-choice discrepancy: Noncompatibility or restructuring? Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 7, 145-155.
16. Pan, Z., & Kosicki, G. M. (2001). Framing as a strategic action in public deliberation. In S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy Jr, & A. Grant (Eds.), Framing public life (pp. 35-65). Mahaw, NJ: Erlbaum.
17. Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., Coupey, E., & Johnson, E. J. (1992). A constructive process view of decision making: Multiple strategies in judgment and choice. Acta Psychologica, 80, 107-141.
18. Perner, J., & Kühberger, A. (2006). Framing and the theory-simulation controversy: Predicting people's decisions. In R. Viale, D. Andler, & L. Hirschfeld (Eds.), Biological and cultural bases of human inference (pp. 161-176). New York: Erlbaum.
19. Peters, E., & Levin, I. P. (2008). Dissecting the risky-choice framing effect: Numeracy as an individual-difference factor in weighting risky and riskless options. Judgment and Decision Making, 3, 435-448.
20. Reyna, V. F., & Brainerd, C. J. (1991). Fuzzy-trace theory and framing effects in choice: Gist extraction, truncation, and conversion. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 4, 249-262.
21. Schkade, D. A., & Johnson, E. J. (1989). Cognitive processes in preference reversals. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 44, 203-231.
22. Schneider, S. L., Burke, M. D., Solomonson, A. L., & Laurion, S. K. (2005). Incidental framing effects and associative processes: A study of attribute frames in broadcast news stories. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 18, 261-280.
23. Sher, S., & McKenzie, C. R. (2006). Information leakage from logically equivalent frames. Cognition, 101, 467-494.
24. Sher, S., & McKenzie, C. R. (2008). Framing effects and rationality. In N. Chater, & M. Oaksford (Eds.), The probabilistic mind: Prospects for Bayesian cognitive science (pp. 79-96). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25. Slovic, P., Griffin, D., & Tversky, A. (1990). Compatibility effects in judgment and choice. In R. M. Hogarth (Ed.), Insights in decision making: Theory and applications (pp. 5-27). Chicago: University of Chicago.
26. Stibel, J. M., Dror, I. E., & Ben-Zeev, T. (2009). The collapsing choice theory: Dissociating choice and judgment in decision making. Theory and Decision, 66, 149-179.
27. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453-458.
28. Tversky, A., Sattath, S., & Slovic, P. (1988). Contingent weighting in judgment and choice. Psychological Review, 95, 371-384.