Modeling Interactions in Small Groups

Social Psychology Quarterly

Volumn 76, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 52-72

  Heise, David R ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

affect control theory; juries; small groups

Indexed keywords

EID: 84875031762     PISSN: 01902725     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0190272512467654     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. AgarMichael. 2005. "Agents in Living Color: Toward Emic Agent-Based Models." Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation8(1). Retrieved September 25, 2012 (jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/8/1/4.html).
2. Andrews Patricia Hayes.Sex and Gender Differences in Group Communication: Impact on the Facilitation Process.Small-group research. 1992;23:74-94.
3. Averett Christine P.,Heise David R.Analyzing Social Interaction: Advances in Affect Control Theory. Smith-Lovin L.Heise D. R., ed. New York: Gordon and Breach; 1988:103-32.
4. Bales Robert FreedInteraction Process Analysis: A Method for the Study of Small Groups. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley; 1951:.
5. Bales Robert FreedSocial Interaction Systems: Theory and Measurement. New York: Transaction; 1999:.
6. Bosmajian HaigSexism and Language. Nilsen A. P.Bosmajian H.Gershuny H. L.Stanley J. P., ed. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English; 1977:77-104.
7. Burke PeterHandbook of Social Psychology. DeLamater J., ed. New York: Springer; 2006:363-88.
8. Diamond Shari Seidman,Rose Mary R.Real Juries.Annual Review of Law and Social Science. 2005;1:255-84.
9. Doreian Patrick.On the 'Social Law of Effect' for Task-Oriented Groups.Social Psychology Quarterly. 1979;42:222-31.
10. Eskilson Arlene,Wiley Mary Glenn.Sex Composition and Leadership in Small Groups.Sociometry. 1976;39:183-94.
11. FrancisClareHeiseDavid R.2006. "Mean Affective Ratings of 1,500 Concepts by Indiana University Undergraduates in 2002-3." Data in Computer Program Interact. Retrieved September 25, 2012 (www.indiana.edu/~socpsy/ACT/interact/JavaInteract.html).
12. Gambetta DiegoCodes of the Underworld: How Criminals Communicate. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2009:.
13. Gibson David R.Participation Shifts: Order and Differentiation in Group Conversation.Social Forces. 2003;81:1335-81.
14. Gibson David R.How the Outside Gets In: Modeling Conversational Permeation.Annual Review of Sociology. 2008;34:359-84.
15. Gibson David R.Marking the Turn: Obligation, Engagement, and Alienation in Group Discussions.Social Psychology Quarterly. 2010;73:132-51.
16. Gilbert NigelAgent-Based Models. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2008:.
17. Gilbert Nigel,Troitzsch Klaus G.Simulation for the Social Scientist. Berkshire, England: Open University Press; 2005:.
18. Goetsch Gerald G.,McFarland David D.Models of the Distribution of Acts in Small Discussion Groups.Social Psychology Quarterly. 1980;43:173-83.
19. Goffman ErvingPresentation of Self in Everyday Life. Garden City, NY: Anchor; 1959:.
20. Gray L. N.,von Broembsen M. H.On the Generalizability of the Law of Effect: Social Psychological Measurement of Group Structures and Process.Sociometry. 1976;39:175-83.
21. Harrington Brooke,Fine Gary Alan.Opening the 'Black Box': Small Groups and Twenty-First-Century Sociology.Social Psychology Quarterly. 2000;63:312-23.
22. Harrington Brooke,Fine Gary Alan.Where the Action Is: Small Groups and Recent Developments in Sociological Theory.Small-group research. 2006;37:4-19.
23. Heise David R.Understanding Events: Affect and the Construction of Social Action. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1979:.
24. Heise David R.Expressive Order: Confirming Sentiments in Social Actions. New York: Springer; 2007:.
25. Heise David R.Surveying Cultures: Discovering Shared Conceptions and Sentiments. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Interscience; 2010:.
26. HeiseDavid R.2012. "GroupSimulator." Online Java Applet. Retrieved September 25, 2012 (http://www.indiana.edu/~socpsy/ACT/SmallGroups/GroupSimulator.html).
27. Heise David R.,Thomas Lisa.Predicting Impressions Created by Combinations of Emotion and Social Identity.Social Psychology Quarterly. 1989;52:141-8.
28. Kahneman DanielThinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux; 2011:.
29. KellermanKathy. 2011. "Do Male Jurors Talk More Than Female Jurors in Deliberations?" in Online Jury Research Update: ComCon Kathy Kellermann Communication Consulting. Retrieved September 25, 2012 (www.kkcomcon.com/OJRU/ROJR0711-2.htm).
30. MacKinnon Neil J.Symbolic Interactionism as Affect Control. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press; 1994:.
31. MacKinnon Neil J.,Heise David R.Self, Identity, and Social Institutions. New York: Palgrave; 2010:.
32. Macy Michael W.,Willer Robert.From Factors to Actors: Computational Sociology and Agent-Based Modeling.Annual Review of Sociology. 2002;28:143-66.
33. MastrangeliMassimoSchmidtMartinLacasaLucas. 2010. "The Roundtable: An Abstract Model of Conversation Dynamics." Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation13(4). Retrieved September 25, 2012 (http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/13/4/2.html).
34. McPhail Clark,Powers William T.,Tucker Charles W.Simulating Individual and Collective Action in Temporary Gatherings.Social Science Computer Review. 1992;10:1-28.
35. McPhail Clark,Schweingruber David S.,Ceobanu AlinPurpose, Meaning, and Action: Control Systems Theories in Sociology. McClelland K. A.Fararo T. J., ed. New York: Palgrave Macmillan; 2006:57-83.
36. Miller John H.,Page Scott E.Complex Adaptive Systems: An Introduction to Computational Models of Social Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2007:.
37. Parsons Talcott,Bales Robert FreedFamily, Socialization and Interaction Process. Glencoe, IL: Free Press; 1955:.
38. Parsons Talcott,Bales Robert Freed,Shils Edward A.Working Papers in the Theory of Action. Glencoe, IL: Free Press; 1953:.
39. Pincus David,Fox Kristen M.,Perez Katherine A.,Turner Jaclyn S.,McGeehan Andrew R.Nonlinear Dynamics of Individual and Interpersonal Conflict in an Experimental Group.Small-group Research. 2008;39:150-78.
40. Ridgeway Cecilia L.Framed before We Know It: How Gender Shapes Social Relations.Gender & Society. 2009;23:145-60.
41. Ridgeway Cecilia L.,Smith-Lovin Lynn.The Gender System and Interaction.Annual Review of Sociology. 1999;25:191-216.
42. Robinson Dawn T.,Smith-Lovin Lynn.Timing of Interruptions in Group Discussions.Advances in Group Processes. 1990;7:45-73.
43. Robinson Dawn T.,Smith-Lovin Lynn,Tsoudis Olga.Heinous Crime or Unfortunate Accident? The Effects of Remorse on Responses to Mock Criminal Confessions.Social Forces. 1994;73:175-90.
44. Schegloff Emmanuel. A.Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2007:.
45. Schröder Tobias,Scholl Wolfgang.Affective Dynamics of Leadership: An Experimental Test of Affect Control Theory.Social Psychology Quarterly. 2009;72:180-97.
46. Shackelford Susan,Wood Wendy,Worchel Stephen.Behavioral Styles and the Influence of Women in Mixed-Sex Groups.Social Psychology Quarterly. 1996;59:284-93.
47. Shelly Robert K.,Troyer Lisa.Emergence and Completion of Structure in Initially Undefined and Partially Defined Groups.Social Psychology Quarterly. 2001;64:318-32.
48. Smith-Lovin Lynn.Impressions from Events.Journal of Mathematical Sociology. 1987;13:35-70.
49. Smith-Lovin Lynn,Brody Charles.Interruptions in Group Discussions: The Effects of Gender and Group Composition.American Sociological Review. 1989;54:424-35.
50. Smith-Lovin Lynn,Douglass William.An Affect-Control Analysis of Two Religious Groups.Social Perspectives on Emotion. 1992;1:217-47.
51. Smith-LovinLynnHeiseDavid R.2006. "Mean Affective Ratings of 2,106 Concepts by University of North Carolina Undergraduates in 1978." Data in Computer Program Interact. Retrieved September 25, 2012 (www.indiana.edu/~socpsy/ACT/interact/JavaInteract.html).
52. Smith-Lovin Lynn,Robinson Dawn T.Gender, Interaction and Inequality. Ridgeway C. L., ed. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1992:122-56.
53. Smith-Lovin Lynn,Robinson Dawn T.Purpose, Meaning, and Action: Control Systems Theories in Sociology. McClelland K. A.Fararo T. J., ed. New York: Palgrave MacMillan; 2006:163-88.
54. Smith-Lovin Lynn,Skvoretz John V.,Hudson Charlotte G.Status and Participation in Six-Person Groups: A Test of Skvoretz's Comparative Status Model.Social Forces. 1986;64:992-1005.
55. Stanley Julia P.Sexism and Language. Nilsen A. P.Bosmajian H.Gershuny H. L.Stanley J. P., ed. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English; 1977:43-74.
56. Stephan Frederick F.,Mishler Elliot G.The Distribution of Participation in Small Groups: An Exponential Approximation.American Sociological Review. 1952;17:598-608.
57. Strodtbeck Fred L.,Hook L. Harmon.The Social Dimensions of a Twelve-Man Jury Table.Sociometry. 1961;24:397-415.
58. Strodtbeck Fred L.,Mann Richard D.Sex Role Differentiation in Jury Deliberations.Sociometry. 1956;19:3-11.
59. Thagard PaulThe Cognitive Science of Science: Explanation, Discovery, and Conceptual Change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2012:.
60. Tsoudis Olga,Smith-Lovin Lynn.How Bad Was It? The Effects of Victim and Perpetrator Emotion on Responses to Criminal Court Vignettes.Social Forces. 1998;77:695-722.
61. Wagner David G.,Berger JosephNew Directions in Contemporary Sociological Theory. Berger J.Zelditch M. J., ed. New York: Rowman & Littlefield; 2002:41-76.
62. Wiggins Beverly B.,Heise David R.Expectations, Intentions, and Behavior: Some Tests of Affect Control Theory.Journal of Mathematical Sociology. 1987;13:153-69.
63. WilenskyUri. 1999. "Netlogo Home Page." Retrieved September 25, 2012 (http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/).
64. Wittenbaum Gwen M.,Moreland Richard L.Small-Group Research in Social Psychology: Topics and Trends over Time.Social and Personality Psychology Compass. 2008;2:187-203.
65. Wood Wendy.Meta-Analytic Review of Sex Differences in Group Performance.Psychological Bulletin. 1987;102:53-71.
66. Wooldridge MichaelAn Introduction to Multiagent Systems. Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons; 2009:.