Interaction in Small Groups

Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 363-387

  Burke, Peter J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

American Sociological Review; Experimental Social Psychology; Female Leader; Group Process; Relational Cohesion

Indexed keywords

EID: 85125915709     PISSN: 13896903     EISSN: 2542839X     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/0-387-36921-X_15     Document Type: Chapter

References (176)

1. Anderson, E. (1978). Aptace on the corner. Chicago; University of Chicago Press.
2. Aronson, E., & Mills, J. (1959). The effect of severity of initiation on liking for a group. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 59, 177-181.
3. Asch, S. (1960). Effects of group pressiae upon the modification and distortion of judgments. In D. Cartwright & A. Zander (Eds.), Group dynamics: Research and theory. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.
4. Back, K. W. (1981). Small groups. In M. Rosenberg & R. H. Turner (Eds.), Social psychology: Sociological perspectives (pp. 320-343). New York: Basic Books.
5. Bales, R. F. (1950). Interaction process analysis. Cambridge: Addison-Wesley.
6. Bales, R. F. (1953). The equilibrium problem in small groups. In T. Parsons, R. F. Bales, & E. A. Shils (Eds.), Working papers in the theory of action (pp. 111-161). Glencoe: The Free Press.
7. Bales, R. F. (1956). Task status and likability as a function of talking and listening in decision-making groups. In L. D. White (Ed.), The state of the social sciences (pp. 148-161). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8. Bales, R. F. (1958). Task roles and social roles in problem-solving groups. In E. E. Maccoby, T. M. Newcomb, & E. L. Hartley (Eds.), Readings in social psychology (pp. 437-447). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
9. Bales, R. F. (1970). Personality and interpersonal behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
10. Bales, R. F. (1999). Social interaction systems. Theory and measurement. New Brunswick: Transaction.
11. Bales, R. R, & Slater, P. E. (1955). Role differentiation in small decision-making groups. In T. Parsons & R. F. Bales (Eds.), Family, socialization and interaction process (pp. 259-306). Glencoe: The Free Press.
12. Bales, R. E, & Strodtbeck, F. L. (1951). Phases in group problem solving. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 46, 485-495.
13. Bales, R. R, Strodtbeck, R L., MiUs, T. M., & Roseborough, M. E. (1951). Channels of communication in small groups. American Sociological Review, 16, 461-468.
14. Bavelas, A. (1953). Communication patterns in task-oriented groups. In D. Cartwright & A. Zander (Eds.), Group dynamics (pp. 493-506). Evanston, Illinois: Row, Peterson, and Company.
15. Bennis, W. G., Benne, K. D., & Chin, R. (1961). The planning of change. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
16. Berger, J., & Conner, T. L. (1974). Performance expectations and behavior in small groups: A revised formulation. In J. Berger, T. L. Conner, & M. H. Fisek (Eds.), Expectation states theory: A theoretical research program (pp. 85-109). Cambridge: Winthrop.
17. Berger, J., Fisek, M. H., Norman, R. Z., & Zelditch, M., Jr. (1977). Status characteristics and social interaction: An expectation-states approach. New York: Elsevier.
18. Berger, J., Ridgeway, C. L., Fisek, M. H., & Norman, R. Z. (1998). The legitimation and delegitimation of power and prestige orders. American Sociological Review, 65(3), 379-405.
19. Bienenstock, E. J., & Bonacich, P. (1992). The core as a solution to exclusionary networks. Social Networks, 14{3-4), 231-243.
20. Bion, W. R. (1961). Experiences in groups. New York: Ballantine Books.
21. Bird, C. (1950). Social psychology. New York: Appleton-Century.
22. Bonacich, P., & Lewis, G. H. (1973). Function specialization and sociometric judgment. Sociometry, 56(1), 31-41.
23. Borgatta, E. R, & Bales, R. R (1953a). The consistency of subject behavior and the reliability of scoring in interaction process analysis. American Sociological Review, 18, 566-569.
24. Borgatta, E. R, & Bales, R. R (1953b). Interaction of individuals in reconstituted groups. Sociometry, 16, 302-320.
25. Borgatta, E. P., & Bales, R. R (1956). Sociometric status patterns and characteristics of interaction. Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 289-297.
26. Borgatta, E. R, Bales, R. R, & Couch, A. S. (1954). Some findings relevant to the great man theory of leadership. American Sociological Review, 19, 755-759.
27. Borgatta, E. R, & Crowther, B. (1965). A workbook for the study of social interaction processes; direct observation procedures in the study of individual and group. Chicago: Rand McNally.
28. Boring, E. G. (1945). Psychology for the armed services. Washington, DC: Infantry Journal.
29. Brown, R. (2000). Group processes. Maiden, MA: Blackwell.
30. Brown, S. M. (1979). Male versus female leaders: A comparison of empirical studies. Sex Roles, 5(5), 595-611.
31. Burke, P. J. (1967). The development of task and social-emotional role differentiation. Sociometry, 30, 379-392.
32. Burke, P. J. (1968). Role differentiation and the legitimation of task activity. Sociometry, 31, 404-411.
33. Burke, P. J. (1971). Task and social-emotional leadership role performance. Sociometry, 34, 22-40.
34. Burke, P. J. (1974a). Leadership role differentiation. In C. G. McClintock (Ed.), Experimental social psychology (pp. 514-546). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
35. Burke, P. J. (1974b). Participation and leadership. American Sociological Review, 39, 822-843.
36. Burke, P. J., & Stets, J. E. (1999). Trust and commitment through self-verification. Social Psychology Quarterly, 62(4), 347-366.
37. Burnstein, E., & Vinokur, A. (1977). Persuasive argumentation and social comparison as determinants of attitude polarization. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13{4), 315-332.
38. Burt, R. S., & Janicik, G. A. (1996). Social contagion and social structure. In D. lacobucci (Ed.), Networks in marketing (pp. 32-49). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
39. Butts, C. T. (2001). The complexity of social networks: Theoretical and empirical findings. Social Networks, 23(1), 31-71.
40. Caplow, T. (1956). A theory of coalitions in the triad. American Sociological Review, 21, 489-493.
41. Caplow, T. (1968). Two against one: Coalitions in triads. Oxford, England: Prentice-Hall.
42. Cartwright, D., & Zander, A. (1953a). Leadership: Introduction. In D. Cartwright & A. Zander (Eds.), Group dynamics: Research and theory (pp. 535-550). Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson and Co.
43. Cartwright, D., & Zander, A. (Eds.). (1953b). Group dynamics: Research and theory. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson and Co.
44. Chertkoff, J. M. (1971). Coalition formation as a function of differences in resources. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 15Ci), 371-383.
45. Chertkoff, J. M., Skov, R. B., & Catt, V. L. (1980). Tests of the Laing and Morrison coalition models under different planning horizons. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 7(2), 241-260.
46. Cook, K. S., Emerson, R. M., Gilmore, M. R., & Yamagishi, T. (1983). The distribution of power in exchange networks: Theory and experimental results. American Journal of Sociology, 89, 275-305.
47. Cook, K. S., Fine, G. A., & House, J. S. (1995). Sociological perspectives on social psychology. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
48. Cooley, C. H. (1909). Social organization. New York: Scribner.
49. Corsaro, W. A. (1992). Interpretive reproduction in children's peer cultures. Social Psychology Quarterly, 55(1), 160-177.
50. Davis, J. H. (1996). Small-group research and the steiner questions: The once and future thing. In E. H. Witte & J. H. Davis (Eds.), Understanding group behavior (pp. 3-12). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
51. Davis, J. H., Kameda, X, & Stasson, M. F. (1992). Group risk taking: Selected topics. In J. F. Yates (Ed.), Risk-taking behavior (pp. 164-199). Oxford, England: John Wiley and Sons.
52. Dornbusch, S. M., & Scott, W. R. (1975). Evaluation and the exercise of authority. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
53. Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
54. Eagly, A. H., & Johnson, B. T. (1990). Gender and leadership style: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 108(2), 233-256.
55. Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (1991). Gender and the emergence of leaders: A meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(5), 685-710.
56. Eagly, A. H., Karau, S. J., & Makhijani, M. G. (1995). Gender and the effectiveness of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 117(\), 125-145.
57. Eagly, A. H., Makhijani, M. G., & Klonsky, B. G. (1992). Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111(\), 3-22.
58. Eder, D. (1983). Organizational constraints and individual mobility: Ability group formation and maintenance. Sociological Quarterly, 24(3), 405-420.
59. Emerson, R. M. (1972a). Exchange theory. Part 1: A psychological basis for social exchange. In J. Berger, M. Zelditch, Jr., & B. Anderson (Eds.), Sociological theories inprogress, vol. 2 (pp. 38-61). Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
60. Emerson, R. M. (1972b). Exchange theory. Part 2: exchange relations and networks. In J. Berger, M. Zelditch, Jr., & B. Anderson (Eds.), Sociological theories inprogress, vol. 2 (pp. 61-83). Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
61. FesUnger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117-140.
62. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
63. Festinger, L., Schachter, S., & Back, K. W. (1950). Social pressures in informal groups. New York: Harper.
64. Fiedler, F. E. (1978a). The contingency model and the dynamics of the leadership process. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (vol. 11, pp. 59-112). New York: Academic Press.
65. Fiedler, F. E. (1978b). Recent developments in research on the contingency model. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Group processes. New York: Academic Press.
66. Fisek, M. H., & Ofshe, R. (1970). The process of status evolution. Sociometry, 33(3), 327-346.
67. Forsyth, D. R. (1999). Group dynamics (3rd ed.). Belmont: Wadsworth.
68. Fraser, C, Gouge, C, & Billig, M. (1971). Risky shifts, cautious shifts, and group polarization. European Journal of Social Psychology, /(I), 7-30.
69. French, J. R. P., Jr., & Raven, B. (1960). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright & A. Zander (Eds.), Group dynamics: Research and theory (pp. 607-623). Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson and Co.
70. Freud, S. (1959). Group psychology and the analysis of the ego (J. Strachey, Trans.)-New York: Liveright.
71. Friedkin, N. E. (1992). An expected value model of social power: Predictions for selected exchange networks. Social Networks, 14(3^), 213-229.
72. Friend, K. E., Laing, J. D., & Morrison, R. J. (1974). Bargaining processes and coalition outcomes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, i(l), 222-224.
73. Gamson, W. A. (1961). An experimental test of a theory of coalition formation. American Sociological Review, 26, 565-573.
74. Goethals, G. R., & Zanna, M. R (1979). The role of social comparison in choice shifts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(9), 1469-1476.
75. Gologor, E. (1977). Group polarization in a non-risk-taking culture. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 8(3), 331-346.
76. Gottman, J. M. (1991). Chaos and regulated change in families: A metaphor for the study of transitions. In P. A. Cowan, E. M. Hetherington et al. (Eds.), Family transitions (pp. 247-272). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
77. Gottman, J. M. (1993). Studying emotion in social interaction. In M. Lewis & J. M. Haviland (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (pp. 475-^87). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
78. Gottman, J. M., Coan, J., Carrere, S., & Swanson, C. (1998). Predicting marital happiness and stability from newlywed interactions. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60(1), 5-22.
79. Gottman, J. M., Markman, H., & Notarius, C. (1977). The topography of marital conflict: A sequential analysis of verbal and nonverbal behavior. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 59(3), 461-477.
80. Granovetter, M. (1983). The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. Sociological Theory, (1), 201-233.
81. Hallinan, M. T, & Smith, S. S. (1985). The effects of classroom racial composition on students' interracial friendliness. Social Psychology Quarterly, 48(1), 3-16.
82. Hare, A. P., Borgatta, E. F, & Bales, R. F (1955). Small groups: Studies in social interaction. NY: Alfred A. Knopf
83. Heckathom, D. D. (1983). Extensions of power-dependence theory: The concept of resistance. Social Forces, 61(4), 1206-1231.
84. Heinicke, C, & Bales, R. F. (1953). Developmental trends in the structure of small groups. Sociometry, 16, 7-38.
85. Hogg, M. (1987). Social identity and group cohesiveness. In J. C. Turner, M. A. Hogg, P. J. Oakes, S. D. Reicher, & M. S. Wetherell (Eds.), Rediscovering the social group (pp. 89-116). New York: Basil Blackwell.
86. Hogg, M. A. (1996). Social identity, self-categorization, and the small group. In E. H. Witte & J. H. Davis (Eds.), Understanding group behavior. Vol. 2: Small group processes and interpersonal relations (pp. 227-253). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
87. Hollander, E. P. (1958). Conformity, status, and idiosyncrasy credit. Psychological Review, 65, 117-127.
88. Hollander, E. P. (1993). Legitimacy, power, and influence: A perspective on relational features of leadership. In M. M. Chemers & R. Ayman (Eds.), Leadership theory and research: Perspectives and directions (pp. 29-47). San Diego: Academic Press.
89. Hollander, E. P., & Julian, J. W, (1969). Contemporary trends in the analysis of leadership processes. Psychological Bulletin, 71(5), 387-397.
90. Homans, G. C. (1950). The human group. New York: Harpers.
91. Isenberg, D. J. (1986). Group polarization: A critical review and meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(6), 1141-1151.
92. Jennings, H. H. (1950). Leadership and isolation (2nd ed.). New York: Longmans, Green and Co.
93. Julian, J. W., Hollander, E. P., & Regtila, C. R. (1969). Endorsement of the group spokesman as a function of his source of authority, competence, and success. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, ii(l), 42-49.
94. Kelley, H. H., & Arrowood, A. J. (1960). Coalitions in the triad: Critique and experiment. Sociometry, 23, 231-244.
95. Kemper, T. D. (1991). Predicting emotions from social relations. Social Psychology Quarterly, 54(4), 330-342.
96. Laing, J. D., & Morrison, R. J. (1973). Coalitions and payoffs in three-person sequential games: Initial tests of two formal models. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 5(1), 3-25.
97. Lawler, E. J. (1999). Bringing emotions into social exchange theory. Annual Review of Sociology(2S), 217-244.
98. Lawler, E. J. (2000). Emotion and group cohesion in productive exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 1060), 616-657.
99. Lawler, E. J. (2002). Micro social orders. Social Psychology Quarterly, (55(1), 4-17.
100. Lawler, E. J., & Yoon, J. (1993). Power and the emergence of commitment behavior in negotiated exchange. American Sociological Review, 58, 465-481.
101. Lawler, E. J., & Yoon, J. (1996). Commitment in exchange relations: Test of a theory of relational cohesion. American Sociological Review, 61, 89-108.
102. Leavitt, H. (1951). Some effects of certain communication patterns on group performance. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 47, 38-50.
103. Leik, R. K. (1963). Instrumentality and emotionality in family interaction. Sociometry, 2(5, 134-145.
104. Lewis, G. H. (1972). Role differentiation. American Sociological Review, 37, 424-434.
105. Lindenberg, S. (1997). Grounding groups in theory; Functional, cognitive, and structural interdependencies. In B. Markovsky, M. Lovaglia, & L. Troyer (Eds.), Advances in group processes (vol. 14, pp. 281-331). Greenwich: JAI.
106. Lippitt, R., & White, R. (1943). The "social climate" of children's groups. In R. G. Barker, J. S. Kounin, & H. R Wright (Eds.), Child behavior and development. New York: McGraw-Hill.
107. Lois, J. (2001). Managing emotions, intimacy, and relationships in a volunteer search and rescue group. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 30(2), 131-179.
108. Lovaglia, M. J. (1995a). Negotiated exchanges in social networks. Social Forces, 74{\), 123-155.
109. Lovaglia, M. J. (1995b). Power and status: Exchange, attribution, and expectation states. Small Group Research, 26(3), 400-426.
110. Lovaglia, M. J., & Houser, J. A. (1996). Emotional reactions and status in groups. American Sociological Review, 61{5), 867-883.
111. Lucas, J. W., & Lovaglia, M. J. (1998). Leadership status, gender, group size, and emotion in face-to-face groups. Sociological Perspectives, 4I{3), 617-637.
112. Mackie, D. M. (1986). Social identification effects in group polarization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(4), 720-728.
113. Mann, R. D. (1961). Dimensions of individual performance in small groups under task and social-emotional conditions. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62, 674-682.
114. Markovsky, B., Wilier, D., & Patton, T. (1988). Power relations in exchange networks. American Sociological Review, 53, 220-236.
115. Michener, H. A., & Burt, M. R. (1975). Use of social influence under varying conditions of legitimacy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(3), 398-407.
116. Mills, T. M. (1953). Power relations in three-person groups. American Sociological Review, 18, 351-357.
117. Mills, T. M. (1964). Group transformation. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
118. Molm, L. D. (1997). Coercive power in exchange. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
119. Moreno, J. L. (1951). Sociometry, experimental method and the science of society; An approach to a new political orientation. Beacon, NY: Beacon House.
120. Moreno, J. L., Sc Jennings, H. H. (1960). Statistics of social configurations. In J. L. Moreno (Ed.), The sociometry reader. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
121. Mullins, N. C, &Mullins, C. J. (1973). Theories and theory groups in contemporary American sociology. New York: Harper and Row.
122. Parsons, X, Bales, R. E, & Shils, E. A. (1953). M/orking papers in the theory of action. New York: Free Press.
123. Passariello, N. M., & Newnes, C. (1988). The clinical applicafion of a sociometric test in a therapeutic community: A case study. Journal of Group Psychotherapy, Psychodrama and Sociometry, 40(4), 169-184.
124. Patzer, G. L. (1976). An application of sociometric method in business. Psychology: A Journal of Human Behavior, 13(3), 52-56.
125. Ridgeway, C. L. (1991). The social construction of status value: Gender and other nominal characterisfics. Social Forces, 70(2), 367-386.
126. Ridgeway, C. L. (2001). The emergence of status beliefs: From structural inequality to legitimizing ideology. In J. T. Jost & B. Major (Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations (pp. 257-277). New York: Cambridge University Press.
127. Ridgeway, C. L., & Berger, J. (1986). Expectations, legitimation, and dominance behavior in task groups. American Sociological Review, J/(5), 603-617.
128. Ridgeway, C. L., & Johnson, C. (1990). What is the relationship between socioemotional behavior and status in task gmapsl American Journal of Sociology, 95(5), 1189-1212.
129. Ridgeway, C. L., Johnson, C, & Diekema, D. (1994). External status, legitimacy, and compliance in male and female groups. Social Forces, 72(4), 1051-1077.
130. Riedesel, P. L. (1974). Bales reconsidered: a critical analysis of popularity and leadership differentiation. Sociometry, 37, 557-564.
131. Riley, A., & Burke, P. J. (1995). Idenfities and self-verification in the small group. Social Psychology Quarterly, 58(2), 61-73.
132. Roethlisberger, F. J., & Dickson, W. J. (1970). Management and the worker; an account of a research program conducted by the Western Electric Company, Hawthorne Works, Chicago. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
133. Sanders, G. S., & Baron, R. S. (1977). Is social comparison irrelevant for producing choice shifts? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13(4), 303-314.
134. Schachter, S. (1953). Deviation, rejection, and communication. In D. Cartwright & A. Zander (Eds.), Group dynamics: Research and theory. Evanston, JL: Row, Peterson and Co.
135. Scheflen, A. (1974). Communicational structure. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press.
136. Shelly, R. K. (1993). How sentiments organize interaction. In E. J. Lawler, B. Markovsky, & J. O'Brien (Eds.), Advances in group processes (vol. 16, pp. 113-132). Greenwich: JAI.
137. Shelly, R. K. (2001). How performance expectations arise from sentiments. Social Psychology Quarterly, 64{\), 72-87.
138. Shelly, R. K., & Troyer, L. (2001a). Emergence and completion of structure in initially undefined and partially defined groups. Social Psychology Quarterly, (54(4), 318-332.
139. Shelly, R. K., & Troyer, L. (2001b). Speech duration and dependencies in initially structured and unstructured task groups. Sociological Perspectives, 44(4), 419-444.
140. Shelly, R. K., Troyer, L., Munroe, P. T., & Burger, T. (1999). Social structure and the duration of social acts. Social Psychology Quarterly, 62(1), 83-95.
141. Shelly, R. K., & Webster, M., Jr. (1997). How formal status, liking, and ability status structure interaction: Three theoretical principles and a test. Sociological Perspectives, 40(1), 81-107.
142. Sherif, M. (1936). The psychology of social norms. New York: Harper.
143. Sherif, M. (1966). In common predicament: Social psychology of intergroup conflict and cooperation. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
144. Short, J. p., & Strodtbeck, E L. (1965). Group processes and gang delinquency. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
145. Simmel, G. (1955). Conflict and the web of group-affiliations. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
146. Singh, R., Bohra, K. A., & Dalai, A. K. (1979). Favourableness of leadership situations studied with information integration theory. European Journal of Social Psychology, 9(3), 253-264.
147. Slater, P. E. (1955). Role differentiation in small groups. American Sociological Review, 20, 300-310.
148. Steiner, I. D. (1974). Whatever happened to the group in social psychology? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 10(1), 94-108.
149. Stets, J. E. (1997). Status and identity in marital interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly, 60(3), 185-217.
150. Stets, J. E., & Burke, R J. (1996). Gender, control, and interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly 59(3), 193-220.
151. Stoner, J. A. (1961). A comparison of individual and group decisions including risk. Unpublished, MIT, Cambridge.
152. Strube, M. J., & Garcia, J. E. (1981). A meta-analytic investigation of Fiedler's contingency model of leadership effectiveness. Psychological Bulletin, 90(2), 307-321.
153. Stryker, S., & Psathas, G. (1960). Research on coalitions in the triad: Findings, problems and strategy. Sociometry, 23, 217-230.
154. Tallman, 1., Rotolo, X, & Gray, L. N. (2001). Continuity or change? The impact of parents' divorce on newly married couples. Social Psychology Quarterly, 64(4), 333-346.
155. Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
156. Thrasher, F. M. (1927). The gang: A study of 1,313 gangs in Chicago. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
157. Thye, S. R. (2000). A status value theory of power in exchange relations. American Sociological Review, 65(3), 407^32.
158. Turner, J. C. (1985). Social categorization and the self-concept: A social cognitive theory of group behavior. In E. J. Lawler (Ed.), Advances in Group Processes (vol. 2, pp. 77-122). Greenwich: JAI.
159. Turner, J. C, Hogg, M. A., Oakes, R J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (Eds.). (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. New York: Basil Blackwell.
160. Verba, S. (1961). Small groups and political behavior. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
161. Vinacke, W. E., & Arkoff, A. (1957). An experimental study of coalitions in the triad. American Sociological Review, 22, 406-414.
162. Vinokur, A., & Bumstein, E. (1978). Novel argumentation and attitude change: The case of polarization following group discussion. European Journal of Social Psychology, 8(3), 335-348.
163. Walker, H. A., Thomas, G. M., & Zelditch, M., Jr. (1986). Legitimation, endorsement, and stability. Social Forces, 64(3), 620-643.
164. Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Social identity and group polarization. In J. C. Turner, M. A. Hogg, P J. Oakes, S. D. Reicher, & M. S. Wetherell (Eds.), Rediscovering the social group (pp. 142-170). Oxford: Blackwell.
165. Whitaker, D. S., & Lieberman, M. A. (1967). Psychotherapy through the group process. New York: Atherton Press.
166. White, H. C, Boorman, S. A., & Breiger, R. L. (1976). Social structure from multiple networks 1: Blockmodels of roles and positions. American Journal of Sociology, 81, 730-780.
167. White, R., & Lippitt, R. (1953). Leader behavior and member reaction in three "social climates." In D. Cartwright & A. Zander (Eds.), Group dynamics: Research and theory (pp. 585-611). Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson and Co.
168. Whyte, W. F. (1955). Street corner society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
169. Wilier, D. (1981). Quantity and network structure. In D. Wilier & B. Anderson (Eds.), AfeJivorfts, exchange, and coercion: The elementary theory and its applications (pp. 108-127). New York: Elsevier.
170. Wilier, D. (1999). Network exchange theory: Issues and directions. In D. Wilier (Ed.), Network exchange theory (pp. 1-22). Westport, CT: Praeger.
171. Wilier, D., Lovaglia, M. J., & Markovsky, B. (1997). Power and influence: A theoretical bridge. Social Forces, 7(5(2), 571-603.
172. Wilier, D., & Markovsky, B. (1993). Elementary theory: Its development and research program. In J. Berger & M. Zelditch, Jr (Eds.), Theoretical research programs: Studies in the growth of theory (pp. 323-363). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
173. Wolff, K. H. (1950). The sociology ofCeorg Simmel. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
174. Zelditch, M., Jr. (1969). Can you really study and army in the laboratory? In A. Etzioni (Ed.), A sociological reader on complex organizations (pp. 484-513). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
175. Zelditch, M., Jr. (2001). Processes of legitimation: Recent developments and new directions. Social Psychology Quarterly, 64{\), 4-17.
176. Zelditch, M., Jr., & Walker, H. A. (1984). Legitimacy and the stability of authority. In E. J. Lawler (Ed.), Advances in group processes (pp. 1-27). Greenwich, CT: JAI.