Rib-sparing and internal mammary artery-preserving microsurgical breast reconstruction with the free DIEP flap

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Volumn 131, Issue 3, 2013, Pages

  Kim, Hyungsuk ^a   Lim, So Young ^a   Pyon, Jai Kyong ^a   Bang, Sa Ik ^a   Oh, Kap Sung ^a   Lee, Jeong Eon ^a   Nam, Seok Jin ^a   Mun, Goo Hyun ^a  

^a Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANASTOMOSIS; ARTICLE; BREAST RECONSTRUCTION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; FREE TISSUE GRAFT; HUMAN; MAMMARY ARTERY; METHODOLOGY; MICROSURGERY; MIDDLE AGED; PERFORATOR FLAP; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RIB;

ADULT; ANASTOMOSIS, SURGICAL; FEMALE; FREE TISSUE FLAPS; HUMANS; MAMMAPLASTY; MAMMARY ARTERIES; MICROSURGERY; MIDDLE AGED; PERFORATOR FLAP; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RIBS;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84875021963     PISSN: 00321052     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31827c6d38     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Hemphill AF, de Jesus RA, McElhaney N, Ferrari JP. Endto-side anastomosis to the internal mammary artery in free flap breast reconstruction: Preserving the internal mammary artery for coronary artery bypass grafting. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;122:149e-150e.
2. Greer-Bayramoglu RJ, Chu MW, Fortin AJ. Feasibility of internal mammary vessel use in breast reconstruction versus coronary artery bypass surgery: An anatomic, cadaveric evaluation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127:1783-1789.
3. Apostolides JG, Magarakis M, Rosson GD. Preserving the internal mammary artery: End-to-side microvascular arterial anastomosis for DIEP and SIEA flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128:225e-232e.
4. Rozen WM, Ye X, Guio-Aguilar PL, et al. Autologous microsurgical breast reconstruction and coronary artery bypass grafting: An anatomical study and clinical implications. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;134:181-198.
5. Munhoz AM, Ishida LH, Montag E, et al. Perforator flap breast reconstruction using internal mammary perforator branches as a recipient site: An anatomical and clinical analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;114:62-68.
6. Park MC, Lee JH, Chung J, Lee SH. Use of internal mammary vessel perforator as a recipient vessel for free TRAM breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2003;50:132-137.
7. Saint-Cyr M, Chang DW, Robb GL, Chevray PM. Internal mammary perforator recipient vessels for breast reconstruction using free TRAM, DIEP, and SIEA flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120:1769-1773.
8. Rosson GD, Holton LH, Silverman RP, Singh NK, Nahabedian MY. Internal mammary perforators: A cadaver study. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2005;21:239-242.
9. Nahabedian MY. The internal mammary artery and vein as recipient vessels for microvascular breast reconstruction: Are we burning a future bridge? Ann Plast Surg. 2004;53:311-316.
10. Albertengo JB, Rodriguez A, Buncke HJ, Hall EJ. A comparative study of flap survival rates in end-to-end and end-to-side microvascular anastomosis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1981;67:194-199.
11. Dotson RJ, Bishop AT, Wood MB, Schroeder A. End-to-end versus end-to-side arterial anastomosis patency in microvascular surgery. Microsurgery 1998;18:125-128.
12. Miyamoto S, Takushima A, Okazaki M, Ohura N, Minabe T, Harii K. Relationship between microvascular arterial anastomotic type and area of free flap survival: Comparison of end-to-end, end-to-side, and retrograde arterial anastomosis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121:1901-1908.
13. Miyamoto S, Okazaki M, Ohura N, Shiraishi T, Takushima A, Harii K. Comparative study of different combinations of microvascular anastomoses in a rat model: End-to-end, endto-side, and flow-through anastomosis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;122:449-455.
14. Kavouni A, Shibu M. Problems associated with the use of internal mammary vessels as recipients for free flap breast reconstruction. Br J Plast Surg. 1999;52:597.
15. Schwabegger AH, Gschnitzer C, Ninkovic MM. Contour deformity at the internal mammary recipient site. Br J Plast Surg. 1999;52:674.
16. Conacher ID, Doig JC, Rivas L, Pridie AK. Intercostal neuralgia associated with internal mammary artery grafting. Anaesthesia 1993;48:1070-1071.
17. Knudsen FW, Andersen M, Niebuhr U, Nielsen PL, Krag C. The role of the internal thoracic artery in the sternal blood supply. Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1993;27:3-8.
18. Ninkovic MM, Schwabegger AH, Anderl H. Internal mammary vessels as a recipient site. Clin Plast Surg. 1998;25:213-221.
19. Dupin CL, Allen RJ, Glass CA, Bunch R. The internal mammary artery and vein as a recipient site for free-flap breast reconstruction: A report of 110 consecutive cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1996;98:685-689; discussion 690-692.
20. Schneider DS, McClain L, Robb PK Jr, Rosenthal EL, Wax MK. Use of internal mammary vessels in head and neck microvascular reconstruction. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012;138:172-176.
21. Moran SL, Nava G, Behnam AB, Serletti JM. An outcome analysis comparing the thoracodorsal and internal mammary vessels as recipient sites for microvascular breast reconstruction: A prospective study of 100 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;111:1876-1882.
22. Chang DW. Breast reconstruction with microvascular MSTRAM and DIEP flaps. Arch Plast Surg. 2012;39:3-10.
23. Sacks JM, Chang DW. Rib-sparing internal mammary vessel harvest for microvascular breast reconstruction in 100 consecutive cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;123:1403-1407.
24. Darcy CM, Smit JM, Audolfsson T, Acosta R. Surgical technique: The intercostal space approach to the internal mammary vessels in 463 microvascular breast reconstructions. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2011;64:58-62.
25. Cordeiro PG. Breast reconstruction after surgery for breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:1590-1601.
26. Serletti JM, Fosnot J, Nelson JA, Disa JJ, Bucky LP. Breast reconstruction after breast cancer. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011; 127:124e-135e.
27. Marin-Gutzke M, Sánchez-Olaso A. Reconstructive surgery in young women with breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010;123(Suppl):67-74.
28. World Health Organization. The Global Burden of Disease: 2004 Update. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2008.
29. Follmar KE, Prucz RB, Manahan MA, Magarakis M, Rad AN, Rosson GD. Internal mammary intercostal perforators instead of the true internal mammary vessels as the recipient vessels for breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011; 127:34-40.
30. Hamdi M, Blondeel P, Van Landuyt K, Monstrey S. Algorithm in choosing recipient vessels for perforator free flap in breast reconstruction: The role of the internal mammary perforators. Br J Plast Surg. 2004;57:258-265.
31. Frodel JL, Trachy R, Cummings CW. End-to-end and endto-side microvascular anastomoses: A comparative study. Microsurgery 1986;7:117-123.
32. Samaha FJ, Oliva A, Buncke GM, Buncke HJ, Siko PP. A clinical study of end-to-end versus end-to-side techniques for microvascular anastomosis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;99:1109-1111.
33. Kim EK, Eom JS, Ahn SH, Son BH, Lee TJ. Evolution of the pedicled TRAM flap: A prospective study of 500 consecutive cases by a single surgeon in Asian patients. Ann Plast Surg. 2009;63:378-382.
34. Choi MY, Lee JE, Kim SW, et al. Incidental detection of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast from bilateral prophylactic mastectomy of asymptomatic BRCA2 mutation carrier: A case report. J Breast Cancer 2010;13:311-317.
35. Kim KS, Kim SW, Lee MH, Ahn SH, Park SK. Practice pattern of surgeons for the management of hereditary breast cancer in Korea. J Breast Cancer 2008;11:95-101.