Preserving the internal mammary artery: End-to-side microvascular arterial anastomosis for DIEP and SIEA flap breast reconstruction

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Volumn 128, Issue 4, 2011, Pages

  Apostolides, John G ^a   Magarakis, Michael ^a   Rosson, Gedge D ^a  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANASTOMOSIS; ARTICLE; AUTOTRANSPLANTATION; BREAST RECONSTRUCTION; BREAST TUMOR; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EPIGASTRIC ARTERY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GRAFT REJECTION; GRAFT SURVIVAL; HUMAN; MAMMARY ARTERY; MASTECTOMY; METHODOLOGY; MICROSURGERY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PLASTIC SURGERY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK ASSESSMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VASCULARIZATION;

ADULT; AGED; ANASTOMOSIS, SURGICAL; BREAST NEOPLASMS; COHORT STUDIES; EPIGASTRIC ARTERIES; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GRAFT REJECTION; GRAFT SURVIVAL; HUMANS; MAMMAPLASTY; MAMMARY ARTERIES; MASTECTOMY; MICROSURGERY; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; SURGICAL FLAPS; TRANSPLANTATION, AUTOLOGOUS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 80053026559     PISSN: 00321052     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31821740ff     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Bains RD, Riaz M, Stanley P. Bilateral free DIEP breast reconstruction using contralateral internal mammary and ip-silateral thoracodorsal vessels. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;119: 1385-1386. (Pubitemid 46673610)
2. Casey WJ III, Rebecca AM, Smith AA, Craft RO, Buchel EW. The cephalic and external jugular veins: Important alternative recipient vessels in left-sided microvascular breast reconstruction. Microsurgery 2007;27:465-469. (Pubitemid 47255162)
3. Moran SL, Nava G, Behnam AB, Serletti JM. An outcome analysis comparing the thoracodorsal and internal mammary vessels as recipient sites for microvascular breast reconstruction: A prospective study of 100 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;111:1876-1882. (Pubitemid 36532340)
4. Munhoz AM. Internal mammary perforator recipient vessels for breast reconstruction using free TRAM, DIEP, and SIEA flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;122:315-316.
5. Munhoz AM, Ishida LH, Montag E, et al. Perforator flap breast reconstruction using internal mammary perforator branches as a recipient site: An anatomical and clinical analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;114:62-68. (Pubitemid 39195627)
6. Rad AN, Flores JI, Rosson GD. Free DIEP and SIEA breast reconstruction to internal mammary intercostal perforating vessels with arterial microanastomosis using a mechanical coupling device. Microsurgery 2008;28:407-411.
7. Rosson GD, Holton LH, Silverman RP, Singh NK, Nahabe-dian MY. Internal mammary perforators: A cadaver study. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2005;21:239-242. (Pubitemid 40721016)
8. Saint-Cyr M, Chang DW, Robb GL, Chevray PM. Internal mammary perforator recipient vessels for breast reconstruction using free TRAM, DIEP, and SIEA flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120:1769-1773. (Pubitemid 350306671)
9. Adams MJ, Lipshultz SE, Schwartz C, Fajardo LF, Coen V, Constine LS. Radiation-associated cardiovascular disease: Manifestations and management. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2003; 13:346-356. (Pubitemid 36962655)
10. Calabrese P, Oliva S, Gaglione A. Coronary artery stenosis following mediastinal radiation therapy: Case report and review of the literature. Tumori 2005;91:369-372. (Pubitemid 41433135)
11. Correa CR, Litt HI, Hwang WT, Ferrari VA, Solin LJ, Harris EE. Coronary artery findings after left-sided compared with right-sided radiation treatment for early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:3031-3037. (Pubitemid 47218049)
12. Cousineau G, Lemire P, Guay JP, Méthot F. Coronary heart disease induced by radiotherapy. Union Med Can. 1981;110: 52-54. (Pubitemid 11147586)
13. Dragomanovits SI, Lazopoulos GL, Tzinieris IN, Deliargyris EN. Coronary artery disease following mediastinal irradiation. Hellenic J Cardiol. 2007;48:181-183. (Pubitemid 47621089)
14. Giordano SH, Kuo YF, Freeman JL, Buchholz TA, Hortoba-gyi GN, Goodwin JS. Risk of cardiac death after adjuvant radiotherapy for breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97: 419-424. (Pubitemid 40528604)
15. Gyenes G, Rutqvist LE, Liedberg A, Fornander T. Long-term cardiac morbidity and mortality in a randomized trial of pre-and postoperative radiation therapy versus surgery alone in primary breast cancer. Radiother Oncol. 1998;48:185-190. (Pubitemid 28423790)
16. Nixon AJ, Manola J, Gelman R, et al. No long-term increase in cardiac-related mortality after breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy using modern techniques. J Clin Oncol. 1998;16:1374-1379. (Pubitemid 28175754)
17. Roychoudhuri R, Robinson D, Putcha V, Cuzick J, Darby S, Møller H. Increased cardiovascular mortality more than fifteen years after radiotherapy for breast cancer: A population-based study. BMC Cancer 2007;7:9.
18. Rutqvist LE, Lax I, Fornander T, Johansson H. Cardiovascular mortality in a randomized trial of adjuvant radiation therapy versus surgery alone in primary breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1992;22:887-896.
19. Rutqvist LE, Pettersson D, Johansson H. Adjuvant radiation therapy versus surgery alone in operable breast cancer: Long-term follow-up of a randomized clinical trial. Radiother Oncol. 1993;26:104-110. (Pubitemid 23094675)
20. Tracy GP, Brown DE, Johnson LW, Gottlieb AJ. Radiation-induced coronary artery disease. JAMA 1974;228:1660-1662.
21. Albertengo JB, Rodriguez A, Buncke HJ, Hall EJ. A comparative study of flap survival rates in end-to-end and end-to-side micro-vascular anastomosis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1981;67:194-199. (Pubitemid 11184590)
22. Bas L, May JW Jr, Handren J, Fallon J. End-to-end versus end-to-side microvascular anastomosis patency in experimental venous repairs. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1986;77:442-450. (Pubitemid 16043447)
23. Dotson RJ, Bishop AT, Wood MB, Schroeder A. End-to-end versus end-to-side arterial anastomosis patency in microvas-cular surgery. Microsurgery 1998;18:125-128. (Pubitemid 28294804)
24. Frodel JL, Trachy R, Cummings CW. End-to-end and end-to-side microvascular anastomoses: A comparative study. Microsurgery 1986;7:117-123. (Pubitemid 17194106)
25. Godina M. Preferential use of end-to-side arterial anastomoses in free flap transfers. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1979;64:673-682. (Pubitemid 10176192)
26. Lister G. T-Anastomosis in microsurgical, free flap reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2009;62:844.
27. Lister GD, Arnez ZM. Arterial T and Y grafts. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1991;88:319-322.
28. Miyamoto S, Okazaki M, Ohura N, Shiraishi T, Takushima A, Harii K. Comparative study of different combinations of microvascular anastomoses in a rat model: End-to-end, end-to-side, and flow-through anastomosis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;122:449-455.
29. Miyamoto S, Takushima A, Okazaki M, Ohura N, Minabe T, Harii K. Relationship between microvascular arterial anas-tomotic type and area of free flap survival: Comparison of end-to-end, end-to-side, and retrograde arterial anastomosis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121:1901-1908.
30. Miyamoto S, Takushima A, Okazaki M, Ohura N, Momosawa A, Harii K. Comparative study of different combinations of microvascular anastomosis types in a rat vasospasm model: Versatility of end-to-side venous anastomosis in free tissue transfer for extremity reconstruction. J Trauma 2009;66:831-834.
31. Ueda K, Harii K, Nakatsuka T, Asato H, Yamada A. Comparison of end-to-end and end-to-side venous anastomosis in free-tissue transfer following resection of head and neck tumors. Microsurgery 1996;17:146-149.
32. Katz RD, Manahan MA, Rad AN, Flores JI, Singh NK, Rosson GD. Classification schema for anatomic variations of the inferior epigastric vasculature evaluated by abdominal CT angiograms for breast reconstruction. Microsurgery 2010;30: 593-602.
33. Masia J, Clavero JA, Larrañaga JR, Alomar X, Pons G, Serret P. Multidetector-row computed tomography in the planning of abdominal perforator flaps. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2006;59:594-599.
34. Rosson GD, Williams CG, Fishman EK, Singh NK. 3D CT angiography of abdominal wall vascular perforators to plan DIEAP flaps. Microsurgery 2007;27:641-646. (Pubitemid 350175148)
35. American Heart Association. Heart disease and stroke statistics: 2009 update. A report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation 2009;119:480-486.
36. Paszat LF, Mackillop WJ, Groome PA, Boyd C, Schulze K, Holowaty E. Mortality from myocardial infarction after adjuvant radiotherapy for breast cancer in the surveillance, epidemiology, and end-results cancer registries. J Clin Oncol. 1998;16:2625-2631. (Pubitemid 28363025)
37. Kowada M, Ames A III, Majno G, Wright RL. Cerebral ischemia: I. An improved experimental method for study; cardiovascular effects and demonstration of an early vascular lesion in the rabbit. J Neurosurg. 1968;28:150-157.
38. May JW Jr, Chait LA, O'Brien BM, Hurley JV. The no-reflow phenomenon in experimental free flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1978;61:256-267. (Pubitemid 8277578)
39. Pick AW, Orszulak TA, Anderson BJ, Schaff HV. Single versus bilateral internal mammary artery grafts: 10-year outcome analysis. Ann Thorac Surg. 1997;64:599-605. (Pubitemid 27435663)
40. Schmitto JD, Rajab TK, Cohn LH. Prevalence and variability of internal mammary graft use in contemporary multivessel coronary artery bypass graft. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2010;25:609-612.
41. Hemphill AF, de Jesus RA, McElhaney N, Ferrari JP. End-to-side anastomosis to the internal mammary artery in free flap breast reconstruction: Preserving the internal mammary artery for coronary artery bypass grafting. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;122:149e-150e