Picture novelty attenuates semantic interference and modulates concomitant neural activity in the anterior cingulate cortex and the locus coeruleus

NeuroImage

Volumn 74, Issue , 2013, Pages 179-187

  Krebs, Ruth M ^a   Fias, Wim ^a   Achten, Eric ^a   Boehler, Carsten N ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Anterior cingulate cortex; Conflict; FMRI; Locus coeruleus; Novelty; Saliency

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANATOMICAL VARIATION; ANTERIOR CINGULATE; ARTICLE; BRAIN FUNCTION; COGNITION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE DISPLAY; IMAGE PROCESSING; LOCUS CERULEUS; MENTAL TASK; NERVE STIMULATION; NERVOUS SYSTEM PARAMETERS; NEUROIMAGING; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEMANTICS;

ADULT; ATTENTION; BRAIN MAPPING; FEMALE; GYRUS CINGULI; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; LOCUS COERULEUS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; SEMANTICS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84874973177     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: 10959572     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.02.027     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Astafiev S.V., Snyder A.Z., Shulman G.L., Corbetta M. Comment on "Modafinil shifts human locus coeruleus to low-tonic, high-phasic activity during functional MRI" and "Homeostatic sleep pressure and responses to sustained attention in the suprachiasmatic area". Science 2010, 328:309.
2. Aston-Jones G., Cohen J.D. An integrative theory of locus coeruleus-norepinephrine function: adaptive gain and optimal performance. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2005, 28:403-450.
3. Barcelo F., Escera C., Corral M.J., Perianez J.A. Task switching and novelty processing activate a common neural network for cognitive control. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2006, 18:1734-1748.
4. Brett M., Anton J.-L., Valabregue R., Poline J.-P. Region of interest analysis using an SPM toolbox (abstract). Available on CD-Rom. NeuroImage 2002, 16.
5. Bunzeck N., Guitart-Masip M., Dolan R.J., Duzel E. Contextual novelty modulates the neural dynamics of reward anticipation. J. Neurosci. 2011, 31:12816-12822.
6. Carter C., van Veen V. Anterior cingulate cortex and conflict detection: an update of theory and data. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 2007, 7:367-379.
7. Debener S., Ullsperger M., Siegel M., Fiehler K., von Cramon D.Y., Engel A.K. Trial-by-trial coupling of concurrent electroencephalogram and functional magnetic resonance imaging identifies the dynamics of performance monitoring. J. Neurosci. 2005, 25:11730-11737.
8. Downar J., Crawley A.P., Mikulis D.J., Davis K.D. A cortical network sensitive to stimulus salience in a neutral behavioral context across multiple sensory modalities. J. Neurophysiol. 2002, 87:615-620.
9. Doya K. Modulators of decision making. Nat. Neurosci. 2008, 11:410-416.
10. Eapen M., Zald D.H., Gatenby J.C., Ding Z., Gore J.C. Using high-resolution MR imaging at 7T to evaluate the anatomy of the midbrain dopaminergic system. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011, 32:688-694.
11. Egner T. Congruency sequence effects and cognitive control. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 2007, 7:380-390.
12. Egner T., Hirsch J. Cognitive control mechanisms resolve conflict through cortical amplification of task-relevant information. Nat. Neurosci. 2005, 8:1784-1790.
13. Friedman D., Cycowicz Y.M., Gaeta H. The novelty P3: an event-related brain potential (ERP) sign of the brain's evaluation of novelty. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2001, 25:355-373.
14. Friston K., Holmes A.P., Worsley K.J., Poline J.B., Frith C.D., Frackowiak R.S. Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: a general linear approach. Hum. Brain Mapp. 1995, 2:189-210.
15. Guitart-Masip M., Bunzeck N., Stephan K.E., Dolan R.J., Duzel E. Contextual novelty changes reward representations in the striatum. J. Neurosci. 2010, 30:1721-1726.
16. Hinrichs H., Scholz M., Tempelmann C., Woldorff M.G., Dale A.M., Heinze H.-J. Deconvolution of event-related fmri responses in fast-rate experimental designs: tracking amplitude variations. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2000, 12:76-89.
17. Keren N.I., Lozar C.T., Harris K.C., Morgan P.S., Eckert M.A. In vivo mapping of the human locus coeruleus. NeuroImage 2009, 47:1261-1267.
18. Kerns J.G., Cohen J.D., MacDonald A.W., Cho R.Y., Stenger V.A., Carter C.S. Anterior cingulate conflict monitoring and adjustments in control. Science 2004, 303:1023-1026.
19. Krebs R.M., Schott B.H., Schutze H., Duzel E. The novelty exploration bonus and its attentional modulation. Neuropsychologia 2009, 47:2272-2281.
20. Krebs R.M., Heipertz D., Schuetze H., Duzel E. Novelty increases the mesolimbic functional connectivity of the substantia nigra/ventral tegmental area (SN/VTA) during reward anticipation: evidence from high-resolution fMRI. NeuroImage 2011, 58:647-655.
21. Liddell B.J., Brown K.J., Kemp A.H., Barton M.J., Das P., Peduto A., Gordon E., Williams L.M. A direct brainstem-amygdala-cortical 'alarm' system for subliminal signals of fear. NeuroImage 2005, 24:235-243.
22. Limbrick-Oldfield E.H., Brooks J.C., Wise R.J., Padormo F., Hajnal J.V., Beckmann C.F., Ungless M.A. Identification and characterisation of midbrain nuclei using optimised functional magnetic resonance imaging. NeuroImage 2011, 59:1230-1238.
23. MacDonald A.W., Cohen J.D., Stenger V.A., Carter C.S. Dissociating the role of the dorsolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortex in cognitive control. Science 2000, 288:1835-1838.
24. MacLeod C.M. Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review. Psychol. Bull. 1991, 109:163-203.
25. MacLeod C.M., MacDonald P.A. Interdimensional interference in the Stroop effect: uncovering the cognitive and neural anatomy of attention. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2000, 4:383-391.
26. McLaren D.G., Ries M.L., Xu G., Johnson S.C. A generalized form of context-dependent psychophysiological interactions (gPPI): a comparison to standard approaches. NeuroImage 2012, 61:1277-1286.
27. Miller E.K., Cohen J.D. An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2001, 24:167-202.
28. Minzenberg M.J., Watrous A.J., Yoon J.H., Ursu S., Carter C.S. Modafinil shifts human locus coeruleus to low-tonic, high-phasic activity during functional MRI. Science 2008, 322:1700-1702.
29. Nee D.E., Wager T.D., Jonides J. Interference resolution: insights from a meta-analysis of neuroimaging tasks. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 2007, 7:1-17.
30. Nyberg L. Any novelty in hippocampal formation and memory?. Curr. Opin. Neurol. 2005, 18:424-428.
31. Opitz B., Mecklinger A., Friederici A.D., von Cramon D.Y. The functional neuroanatomy of novelty processing: integrating ERP and fMRI results. Cereb. Cortex 1999, 9:379-391.
32. O'Reilly J.X., Woolrich M.W., Behrens T.E., Smith S.M., Johansen-Berg H. Tools of the trade: psychophysiological interactions and functional connectivity. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 2012, 7:604-609.
33. Parmentier F.B., Andres P. The involuntary capture of attention by sound: novelty and postnovelty distraction in young and older adults. Exp. Psychol. 2010, 57:68-76.
34. Ranganath C., Rainer G. Neural mechanisms for detecting and remembering novel events. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2003, 4:193-202.
35. Ridderinkhof K.R., Ullsperger M., Crone E.A., Nieuwenhuis S. The role of the medial frontal cortex in cognitive control. Science 2004, 306:443-447.
36. Rorden C., Brett M. Stereotaxic display of brain lesions. Behav. Neurol. 2000, 12:191-200.
37. Sara S.J. Learning by neurones: role of attention, reinforcement and behaviour. C. R. Acad. Sci. III 1998, 321:193-198.
38. Sara S.J. The locus coeruleus and noradrenergic modulation of cognition. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2009, 10:211-223.
39. Schmidt C., Collette F., Leclercq Y., Sterpenich V., Vandewalle G., Berthomier P., Berthomier C., Phillips C., Tinguely G., Darsaud A., Gais S., Schabus M., Desseilles M., Dang-Vu T.T., Salmon E., Balteau E., Degueldre C., Luxen A., Maquet P., Cajochen C., Peigneux P. Homeostatic sleep pressure and responses to sustained attention in the suprachiasmatic area. Science 2009, 324:516-519.
40. Schomaker J., Meeter M. Novelty enhances visual perception. PLoS One 2012, 7:e50599.
41. Seeley W.W., Menon V., Schatzberg A.F., Keller J., Glover G.H., Kenna H., Reiss A.L., Greicius M.D. Dissociable intrinsic connectivity networks for salience processing and executive control. J. Neurosci. 2007, 27:2349-2356.
42. Sterpenich V., D'Argembeau A., Desseilles M., Balteau E., Albouy G., Vandewalle G., Degueldre C., Luxen A., Collette F., Maquet P. The locus ceruleus is involved in the successful retrieval of emotional memories in humans. J. Neurosci. 2006, 26:7416-7423.
43. van Kesteren M.T., Ruiter D.J., Fernandez G., Henson R.N. How schema and novelty augment memory formation. Trends Neurosci. 2012, 35:211-219.
44. van Maanen L., van Rijn H., Borst J.P. Stroop and picture-word interference are two sides of the same coin. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 2009, 16:987-999.
45. Verguts T., Notebaert W. Adaptation by binding: a learning account of cognitive control. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2009, 13:252-257.
46. Wessel J.R., Danielmeier C., Morton J.B., Ullsperger M. Surprise and error: common neuronal architecture for the processing of errors and novelty. J. Neurosci. 2012, 32:7528-7537.
47. Zucca F.A., Bellei C., Giannelli S., Terreni M.R., Gallorini M., Rizzio E., Pezzoli G., Albertini A., Zecca L. Neuromelanin and iron in human locus coeruleus and substantia nigra during aging: consequences for neuronal vulnerability. J. Neural Transm. 2006, 113:757-767.