PTMeta: Increasing identification rates of modified peptides using modification prescanning and meta-analysis

Proteomics

Volumn 13, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 1042-1051

  Nahnsen, Sven ^a   Sachsenberg, Timo ^a   Kohlbacher, Oliver ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Bioinformatics; Meta analysis; PTM; Statistics

Indexed keywords

PEPTIDE;

ARTICLE; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN DATABASE; PROTEIN MODIFICATION;

ALGORITHMS; DATABASES, PROTEIN; ESCHERICHIA COLI PROTEINS; HUMANS; META-ANALYSIS AS TOPIC; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; PEPTIDE FRAGMENTS; PEPTIDE MAPPING; PROTEIN PROCESSING, POST-TRANSLATIONAL; PROTEOME; SEARCH ENGINE; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84874970039     PISSN: 16159853     EISSN: 16159861     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201200315     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Geer, L. Y., Markey, S. P., Kowalak, J. A., Wagner, L. et al., Open mass spectrometry search algorithm. J. Proteome Res. 2004, 3, 958-964.
2. Craig, R., Beavis, R. C., TANDEM: matching proteins with tandem mass spectra. Bioinformatics 2004, 20, 1466-1467.
3. Perkins, D. N., Pappin, D. J. C., Creasy, D. M., Cottrell, J. S., Probability-based protein identification by searching sequence databases using mass spectrometry data. Electrophoresis 1999, 20, 3551-3567.
4. Eng, J. K., McCormack, A. L., Yates, J. R., An approach to correlate tandem mass spectral data of peptides with amino acid sequences in a protein database. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 1994, 5, 976-989.
5. Michalski, A., Damoc, E., Hauschild, J. P., Lange, O. et al., Mass spectrometry-based proteomics using Q Exactive, a high-performance benchtop quadrupole Orbitrap mass spectrometer. Mol. Cell. Proteomics. 2011, 10, M111 011015.
6. Olsen, J. V., Schwartz, J. C., Griep-Raming, J., Nielsen, M. L. et al., A dual pressure linear ion trap orbitrap instrument with very high sequencing speed. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2009, 8, 2759-2769.
7. Michalski, A., Cox, J., Mann, M., More than 100, 000 detectable peptide species elute in single shotgun proteomics runs but the majority is inaccessible to data-dependent LC-MS/MS. J. Proteome Res. 2011, 10, 1785-1793.
8. Wong, J. W. H., Sullivan, M. J., Cartwright, H. M., Cagney, G., msmsEval: tandem mass spectral quality assignment for high-throughput proteomics. BMC Bioinformatics 2007, 8, 51.
9. Shteynberg, D., Deutsch, E. W., Lam, H., Eng, J. K. et al., iProphet: multi-level integrative analysis of shotgun proteomic data improves peptide and protein identification rates and error estimates. Mol. Cell. Proteomics. 2011, 10, M111 007690.
10. Kwon, T., Choi, H., Vogel, C., Nesvizhskii, A. I. et al., MSblender: a probabilistic approach for integrating peptide identifications from multiple database search engines. J. Proteome Res. 2011, 10, 2949-2958.
11. Nahnsen, S., Bertsch, A., Rahnenfuhrer, J., Nordheim, A. et al., Probabilistic consensus scoring improves tandem mass spectrometry peptide identification. J. Proteome Res. 2011, 10, 3332-3343.
12. Edwards, N., Wu, X., Tseng, C.-W., An unsupervised, model-free, machine-learning combiner for peptide identifications from tandem mass spectra. Clin. Proteomics 2009, 5, 23-36.
13. Searle, B. C., Turner, M., Nesvizhskii, A. I., Improving sensitivity by probabilistically combining results from multiple MS/MS search methodologies. J. Proteome Res. 2008, 7, 245-253.
14. Macek, B., Mann, M., Olsen, J. V., Global and site-specific quantitative phosphoproteomics: principles and applications. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. 2009, 49, 199-221.
15. Zhao, Y. M., Jensen, O. N., Modification-specific proteomics: strategies for characterization of post-translational modifications using enrichment techniques. Proteomics 2009, 9, 4632-4641.
16. Beausoleil, S. A., Jedrychowski, M., Schwartz, D., Elias, J. E. et al., Large-scale characterization of HeLa cell nuclear phosphoproteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 12130-12135.
17. Ahrne, E., Nikitin, F., Lisacek, F., Muller, M., QuickMod: a tool for open modification spectrum library searches. J. Proteome Res. 2011, 10, 2913-2921.
18. Savitski, M. M., Nielsen, M. L., Zubarev, R. A., ModifiComb, a new proteomic tool for mapping substoichiometric post-translational modifications, finding novel types of modifications, and fingerprinting complex protein mixtures. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2006, 5, 935-948.
19. Na, S., Bandeira, N., Paek, E., Fast multi-blind modification search through tandem mass spectrometry. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2012, 11, M111 010199.
20. Fu, Y., Xiu, L. Y., Jia, W., Ye, D. et al., DeltAMT: a statistical algorithm for fast detection of protein modifications from LC-MS/MS data. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2011, 10, M110 000455.
21. Han, X., He, L., Xin, L., Shan, B. et al., PeaksPTM: mass spectrometry-based identification of peptides with unspecified modifications. J. Proteome Res. 2011, 10, 2930-2936.
22. Witze, E. S., Old, W. M., Resing, K. A., Ahn, N. G., Mapping protein post-translational modifications with mass spectrometry. Nat. Methods 2007, 4, 798-806.
23. Tanner, S., Shu, H. J., Frank, A., Wang, L. C. et al., InsPecT: identification of posttransiationally modified peptides from tandem mass spectra. Analytical Chemistry 2005, 77, 4626-4639.
24. Gnad, F., Ren, S. B., Cox, J., Olsen, J. V. et al., PHOSIDA (phosphorylation site database): management, structural and evolutionary investigation, and prediction of phosphosites. Genome Biol. 2007, 8, R250.
25. Li, H., Xing, X. B., Ding, G. H., Li, Q. R. et al., SysPTM: a systematic resource for proteomic research on post-translational modifications. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2009, 8, 1839-1849.
26. Kamath, K. S., Vasavada, M. S., Srivastava, S., Proteomic databases and tools to decipher post-translational modifications. J. Proteomics 2011, 75, 127-144.
27. Elias, J. E., Gygi, S. P., Target-decoy search strategy for increased confidence in large-scale protein identifications by mass spectrometry. Nat. Methods 2007, 4, 207-214.
28. Stouffer, S. A., The American Soldier, Princeton University Press, Princeton 1949.
29. Whitlock, M. C., Combining probability from independent tests: the weighted Z-method is superior to Fisher's approach. J. Evol. Biol. 2005, 18, 1368-1373.
30. Spirin, V., Shpunt, A., Seebacher, J., Gentzel, M. et al., Assigning spectrum-specific P-values to protein identifications by mass spectrometry. Bioinformatics 2011, 27, 1128-1134.
31. Kohlbacher, O., Reinert, K., Gröpl, C., Lange, E. et al., TOPP-the OpenMS proteomics pipeline. Bioinformatics 2007, 23, e191-197.
32. Sturm, M., Bertsch, A., Gröpl, C., Hildebrandt, A. et al., OpenMS-an open-source software framework for mass spectrometry. BMC Bioinformatics 2008, 9, 163.
33. Käll, L., Storey, J. D., MacCoss, M. J., Noble, W. S., Assigning significance to peptides identified by tandem mass spectrometry using decoy databases. J. Proteome Res. 2008, 7, 29-34.
34. Käll, L., Storey, J. D., MacCoss, M. J., Noble, W. S., Posterior error probabilities and false discovery rates: two sides of the same coin. J. Proteome Res. 2008, 7, 40-44.
35. Creasy, D. M., Cottrell, J. S., Unimod: protein modifications for mass spectrometry. Proteomics 2004, 4, 1534-1536.
36. Fenyo, D., Beavis, R. C., A method for assessing the statistical significance of mass spectrometry-based protein identifications using general scoring schemes. Anal. Chem. 2003, 75, 768-774.
37. Beck, M., Schmidt, A., Malmstroem, J., Claassen, M. et al., The quantitative proteome of a human cell line. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2011, 7, 549.
38. Sabareesh, V., Balaram, P., Tandem electrospray mass spectrometric studies of proton and sodium ion adducts of neutral peptides with modified N- and C-termini: synthetic model peptides and microheterogeneous peptaibol antibiotics. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2006, 20, 618-628.