Physical entrapment of hyaluronic acid during synthesis results in extended release from model hydrogel and silicone hydrogel contact lens materials

Eye and Contact Lens

Volumn 39, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 179-185

  Weeks, Andrea ^a   Subbaraman, Lakshman N ^a   Jones, Lyndon ^a,b   Sheardown, Heather ^a,b  

^a MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HYALURONIC ACID; IODINE 125; LYSOZYME; SILICONE; SILICONE HYDROGEL; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CONTACT LENS; DRUG RELEASE; ENZYME LINKED IMMUNOSORBENT ASSAY; HYDROGEL; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ULTRAVIOLET SPECTROSCOPY;

ADSORPTION; CONTACT LENSES, HYDROPHILIC; DELAYED-ACTION PREPARATIONS; HYALURONIC ACID; HYDROGELS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MURAMIDASE;

EID: 84874946152     PISSN: 15422321     EISSN: 1542233X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ICL.0b013e318281ae06     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Fraser JRE, Laurent TC, Laurent UBG. Hyaluronan: Its nature, distribution, functions and turnover. J Int Med 1997;242:27-33.
2. Knudson CB, Knudson W. Cartilage proteoglycans. Semin Cell Dev Biol 2001;12:69-78.
3. Brewton RG, Mayne R. Mammalian vitreous humor contains networks of hyaluronan molecules: Electron microscope analysis using the hyaluronanbinding region (G1) and aggrecan and link protein. Exp Cell Res 1992;198: 237-249.
4. Sattar A, Kumar S, West DC. Does hyaluronan have a role in the endothelial cell proliferation of the synovium? Semin Arthritis Rheum 1992;22:37-43.
5. Meyer K, Palmer JW. The polysaccharide of the vitreous humor. J Biol Chem 1934;107:629-634.
6. Leach JB, Bivens KA, Patrick CW, et al. Photocrosslinked hyaluronic acid hydrogels: Natural, biodegradable tissue engineering scaffolds. Biotechnol Bioeng 2003;82:578-589.
7. Alauzun JG, Young SY, D'Souza R, et al. Biocompatible, hyaluronic acid modified silicone elastomers. Biomaterials 2010;31:3471-3478.
8. Miller D, Stegman R. The use of healon in intraocular lens implantation. Int Ophthalmol Clinic 1982;22:177-187.
9. Sher JH, Gooi P, Dubinski W, et al. Comparison of the incidence of opacification of Hydroview hydrogel intraocular lenses with the ophthalmic viscosurgical device used during surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 2008;34:459-464.
10. Yenice I, Mocan MC, Palaska E, et al. Hyaluronic acid coated poly-caprolactone nanospheres deliver high concentrations of cyclosporine A into the cornea. Exp Eye Res 2008;87:162-167.
11. Kyyronen K, Hume L, Benedetti L, et al. Methylprednisolone esters of hyaluronic acid in ophthalmic drug delivery: In vitro and in vivo release studies. Int J Pharm 1992;80:161-169.
12. Barbault-Foucher S, Gref R, Russo P, et al. Design of poly-caprolactone nanospheres coated with bioadhesive hyaluronic acid for ocular delivery. J Control Release 2002;83:365-375.
13. Cho KY, Chung TW, Kim BC, et al. Release of ciprofloxacin from poloxamer- graft-hyaluronic acid hydrogels in vitro. Int J Pharm 2003;260:83-91.
14. Moriyama K, Ooya T, Yui N. Hyaluronic acid grafted with poly(ethylene glycol) as a novel peptide formulation. J Control Release 1999;59:77-86.
15. Yokoi N, Komuro A, Nishida K, et al. Effectiveness of hyaluronan on corneal epithelial barrier function in dry eye. Br J Ophthalmol 1997;81:533-536.
16. Aragona P, Papa V, Micali A, et al. Long term treatment with sodium hyaluronate-containing artificial tears reduces ocular surface damage in patients with dry eye. Br J Ophthalmol 2002;86:181-184.
17. Ali M, Byrne ME. Controlled release of high molecular weight hyaluronic acid from molecularly imprinted hydrogel contact lenses. Pharm Res 2009; 26:714-726.
18. Limberg MB, McCaa C, Kissling GE, et al. Topical application of hyaluronic acid and chondroitin sulfate in the treatment of dry eyes. Am J Ophthalmol 1987;103:194-197.
19. Nakamura M, Sato N, Chikama T-C, et al. Hyaluronan facilitates corneal epithelial wound healing in diabetic rats. Exp Eye Res 1997;64:1043-1050.
20. Bowers RWJ, Tighe BJ. Studies of the ocular compatibility of hydrogels. A review of the clinical manifestations of spoilation. Biomaterials 1987;8:83-89.
21. Skotnitsky C, Sankaridurg PR, Sweeney DF, et al. General and local contact lens induced papillary conjunctivitis. Clin Exp Optom 2002;85:193-197.
22. Ballow M, Donshik PC, Rapacz P, et al. Immune responses in monkeys to lenses from patients with contact lens induces giant papillary conjunctivitis. CLAO J 1989;15:64-70.
23. Porazinski AD, Donshik PC. Giant papillary conjunctivitis in frequent replacement contact lens wearers: A retrospective study. CLAO J 1999;25:142-147.
24. Allansmith MR, Korb DR, Greiner JV, et al. Giant papillary conjunctivitis in contact lens wearers. Am J Ophthalmol 1977;83:697-708.
25. Butrus SI, Klotz SA. Contact lens surface deposits increase the adhesion of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Curr Eye Res 1990;9:717-724.
26. Willis SL, Court JL, Redman RP, et al. A novel phosphorylcholine-coated contact lens for extended wear use. Biomaterials 2001;22:3261-3272.
27. Chen H, Brook MA, Chen Y, et al. Surface properties of PEO-silicone composites: Reducing protein adsorption. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 2005; 16:531-548.
28. Feng W, Brash JLB, Zhu S. Non-biofouling materials prepared by atom transfer radical polymerization grafting of 2-methacryloloxyethyl phophorylcholine: Separate effects of graft density and chain length on protein repulsion. Biomaterials 2006;27:847-855.
29. Weeks A, Morrison D, Alauzun J, et al. Photocrosslinkable hyaluronic acid as an internal wetting agent in model conventional and silicone hydrogel contact lenses. J Biomed Mater Res A 2012;100:1972-1982.
30. Van Beek M, Jones L, Sheardown H. Hyaluronic acid containing hydrogels for the reduction of protein adsorption. Biomaterials 2008;29:780-789.
31. Van Beek M, Weeks A, Jones L, et al. Immobilized hyaluronic acid containing model silicone hydrogels reduce protein adsorption. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 2008;19:1425-1436.
32. Weeks A, Boone A, Luensmann D, et al. The effects of hyaluronic acid incorporated as a wetting agent on lysozyme denaturation in model contact lens materials [published online May 4, 2012]. J Biomater Appl doi: 10.1177/0885328212446936.
33. Weeks A, Luensmann D, Boone A, et al. Hyaluronic acid as an internal wetting agent in model DMAA/TRIS contact lenses. J Biomater App 2012; 27:423-432.
34. Weeks A, Subbaraman L, Jones L, et al. The competing effects of hyaluronic and methacrylic acid in model contact lenses. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 2012;23:1021-1038.
35. Yanez F, Concheiro A, Alvarez-Lorenzo C. Macromolecule release and smoothness of semi-interpenetrating PVP-pHEMA networks for comfortable soft contact lenses. Eu J Pharm Biopharm 2008;69:1094-1103.
36. Fagnola M, Pagani MP, Maffioletti S, et al. Hyaluronic acid in hydrophilic contact lenses: Spectroscopic investigations of the content and release in solution. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2009;32:108-112.
37. Winterton LC, Lally JL, Sentell KB, et al. The elution of poly (vinyl alcohol) from a contact lens: The realization of a time release moisturizing agent/ artificial tear. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2007;80B:424-432.
38. Hehl EM, Beck R, Luthard K, et al. Improved penetration of aminoglycosides and fluoroquinolones into the aqueous humour of patients by means of Acuvue contact lenses. Eu J Clin Pharm 1999;55:317-323.
39. Karlgard CCS, Wong NS, Jones LW, et al. In vitro uptake and release studies of ocular pharmaceutical agents by silicon-containing and p-HEMA hydrogel contact lens materials. Int J Pharm 2003;257:141-151.
40. Uchida R, Sato T, Tanigawa H, et al. Azulene incorporation and release by hydrogel containing methacrylamide propyltrimenthylammonium chloride, and its application to soft contact lens. J Control Release 2003;92:259-264.
41. Mullarney MP, Seery TAP, Weiss RA. Drug diffusion in hydrophobically modified N, N-dimethylacrylamide hydrogels. Polymer 2006;47:3845-3855.
42. Rosa dos Santos JF, Couceiro R, Concheiro A, et al. Poly(hydroxyethyl methacrylate-co-methacrylated-b-cyclodextrin) hydrogels: Synthesis, cytocompatibility, mechanical properties and drug loading/release properties. Acta Biomater 2008;4:745-755.
43. Gulsen D, Chauhan A. Dispersion of microemulsion drops in HEMA hydrogel: A potential ophthalmic drug delivery vehicle. Int J Pharm 2005;292:95-117.
44. Venkatesh S, Sizemore SP, Byrne ME. Biomimetic hydrogels for enhanced loading and extended release of ocular therapeutics. Biomaterials 2007;28:717-724.
45. Hiratani H, Alvarez-Lorenzo C. Timolol uptake and release by imprinted soft contact lenses made of N, N-diethylacrylamide and methacrylic acid. J Control Release 2002;83:223-230.
46. Hiratani H, Mizutani Y, Alvarez-Lorenzo C. Controlling drug release from imprinted hydrogels by modifying the characteristics of the imprinted cavities. Macromol Biosci 2005;5:728-733.
47. Hiratani H, Fujiwara A, Tamiya Y, et al. Ocular release of timolol from molecularly imprinted soft contact lenses. Biomaterials 2005;26:1293-1298.
48. Alvarez-Lorenzo C, Yañez F, Barreiro-Iglesias R, et al. Imprinted soft contact lenses as norfloxacin delivery systems. J Control Release 2006;113:236-244.
49. Peng CC, Kim J, Chauhan A. Extended delivery of hydrophilic drugs from silicone-hydrogel contact lenses containing Vitamin E diffusion barriers. Biomaterials 2010;31:4032-4047.
50. Ardaillou N, Larrieu MJ. In vitro studies of radioiodinated fibrinogen comparison of the IC1 and enzymatic methods. Thromb Res 1974;5:327-341.
51. Minarik L, Rapp J. Protein deposits on individual hydrophilic contact lenses: Effects of water and ionicity. CLAO J 1989;15:185-188.
52. Baines MG, Cai F, Backman HA. Adsorption and removal of protein bound to hydrogel contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 1990;67:807-810.