In vivo visualization of polymer-based mesh implants using conventional magnetic resonance imaging and positive-contrast susceptibility imaging

Investigative Radiology

Volumn 48, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 200-205

  Kraemer, Nils A ^a   Donker, Hank C W ^a   Kuehnert, Nicolas ^a   Otto, Jens ^a   Schrading, Simone ^a   Krombach, Gabriele A ^b   Klinge, Uwe ^a   Kuhl, Christiane K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL RWTH AACHEN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL GIESSEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Abdominal hernia; IRON; Magnetic resonance imaging; Positive contrast susceptibility imaging; Surgical textile mesh implants

Indexed keywords

SUPERPARAMAGNETIC IRON OXIDE NANOPARTICLE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; AUTOPSY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; IMAGE QUALITY; IN VIVO STUDY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; POSITIVE CONTRAST SUSCEPTIBILITY IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGIST; SURGICAL MESH; WILCOXON SIGNED RANKS TEST; WOUND INFECTION;

EID: 84874944471     PISSN: 00209996     EISSN: 15360210     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e31827efd14     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Barbaros U, Asoglu O, Seven R, et al. The comparison of laparoscopic and open ventral hernia repairs: a prospective randomized study. Hernia. 2007;11:51-56. (Pubitemid 46487193)
2. Heniford BT, Park A, Ramshaw BJ, et al. Laparoscopic repair of ventral hernias: nine years' experience with 850 consecutive hernias. Ann Surg. 2003;238:391-399; discussion 399-400.
3. Leber GE, Garb JL, Alexander AI, et al. Long-term complications associated with prosthetic repair of incisional hernias. Arch Surg. 1998;133:378-382. (Pubitemid 28193521)
4. Burger JW, Luijendijk RW, Hop WC, et al. Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of suture versus mesh repair of incisional hernia. Ann Surg. 2004;240:578-583; discussion 583-585.
5. Fischer T, Ladurner R, Gangkofer A, et al. Functional cine MRI of the abdomen for the assessment of implanted synthetic mesh in patients after incisional hernia repair: initial results. Eur Radiol. 2007;17:3123-3129. (Pubitemid 350142338)
6. Lienemann A, Sprenger D, Steitz HO, et al. Detection and mapping of intraabdominal adhesions by using functional cine MR imaging: preliminary results. Radiology. 2000;217:421-425.
7. Zinther NB, Zeuten A, Marinovskij E, et al. Functional cine MRI and transabdominal ultrasonography for the assessment of adhesions to implanted synthetic mesh 5Y7 years after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Hernia. 2010;14:499-504.
8. Kirchhoff S, Ladurner R, Kirchhoff C, et al. Detection of recurrent hernia and intraabdominal adhesions following incisional hernia repair: a functional cine MRI-study. Abdom Imaging. 2010;35:224-231.
9. Kramer NA, Donker HC, Otto J, et al. A concept for magnetic resonance visualization of surgical textile implants. Invest Radiol. 2010;45:477-483.
10. Springer F, Martirosian P, Schwenzer NF, et al. Three-dimensional ultrashort echo time imaging of solid polymers on a 3-Tesla whole-body MRI scanner. Invest Radiol. 2008;43:802-808.
11. Stuber M, Gilson WD, Schar M, et al. Positive contrast visualization of iron oxide-labeled stem cells using inversion-recovery with ON-resonant water suppression (IRON). Magn Reson Med. 2007;58:1072-1077. (Pubitemid 350074377)
12. Korosoglou G, Shah S, Vonken EJ, et al. Off-resonance angiography: a new method to depict vesselsYphantom and rabbit studies. Radiology. 2008;249:501-509.
13. Mani V, Adler E, Briley-Saebo KC, et al. Serial in vivo positive contrast MRI of iron oxide-labeled embryonic stem cell-derived cardiac precursor cells in a mouse model of myocardial infarction. Magn Reson Med. 2008;60:73-81. (Pubitemid 351956611)
14. Suzuki Y, Cunningham CH, Noguchi K, et al. In vivo serial evaluation of superparamagnetic iron-oxide labeled stem cells by off-resonance positive contrast. Magn Reson Med. 2008;60:1269-1275.
15. Dahnke H, Liu W, Herzka D, et al. Susceptibility gradient mapping (SGM): a new postprocessing method for positive contrast generation applied to superparamagnetic iron oxide particle (SPIO)Ylabeled cells. Magn Reson Med. 2008;60:595-603.
16. Vonken EJ, Schar M, Stuber M. Positive contrast visualization of nitinol devices using susceptibility gradient mapping. Magn Reson Med. 2008;60:588-594.
17. Dharmakumar R, Koktzoglou I, Li D. Generating positive contrast from offresonant spins with steady-state free precession magnetic resonance imaging: theory and proof-of-principle experiments. Phys Med Biol. 2006;51:4201-4215. (Pubitemid 44261840)
18. Foltz WD, Cunningham CH, Mutsaers AJ, et al. Positive-contrast imaging in the rabbit hind-limb of transplanted cells bearing endocytosed superparamagnetic beads. J CardiovascMagn Reson. 2006;8:817-823. (Pubitemid 44630051)
19. Gilad AA, Walczak P, McMahon MT, et al. MR tracking of transplanted cells with ''positive contrast'' using manganese oxide nanoparticles. Magn Reson Med. 2008;60:1-7. (Pubitemid 351956602)
20. Kim YB, Bae KH, Yoo SS, et al. Positive contrast visualization for cellular magnetic resonance imaging using susceptibility-weighted echo-time encoding. Magn Reson Imaging. 2009;27:601-610.
21. Leupold J, Hennig J, Scheffler K. Alternating repetition time balanced steady state free precession. Magn Reson Med. 2006;55:557-565. (Pubitemid 43352554)
22. Seppenwoolde JH, Vincken KL, Bakker CJ. White-marker imagingVseparating magnetic susceptibility effects from partial volume effects. Magn Reson Med. 2007;58:605-609. (Pubitemid 350154972)
23. Bieri O, Patil S, Quick HH, et al. Morphing steady-state free precession. Magn Reson Med. 2007;58:1242-1248. (Pubitemid 350234211)
24. Conze J, Junge K,Weiss C, et al. New polymer for intra-abdominal meshesVPVDF copolymer. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2008;87:321-328.
25. Donker HC, Kra?mer NA, Otto J, et al. Mapping of proton relaxation near superparamagnetic iron oxide particle-loaded polymer threads for magnetic susceptibility difference quantification. Invest Radiol. 2012;47:359-367.