Pattern electroretinogram progression in glaucoma suspects

Journal of Glaucoma

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 219-225

  Ventura, Lori M ^a   Golubev, Iuri ^a   Feuer, William J ^a   Porciatti, Vittorio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI MILLER SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Glaucoma; Pattern electroretinogram; Progression; Retinal ganglion cell function; Visual field

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CELL FUNCTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE COURSE; ELECTRORETINOGRAM; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; GONIOSCOPY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PERIMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RETINA GANGLION CELL; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; VISUAL ACUITY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; DISEASE PROGRESSION; ELECTRORETINOGRAPHY; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MIDDLE AGED; OCULAR HYPERTENSION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RETINAL GANGLION CELLS; SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO; VISION DISORDERS; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL FIELD TESTS; VISUAL FIELDS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84874930336     PISSN: 10570829     EISSN: 1536481X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e318237c89f     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Maffei L, Fiorentini A. Electroretinographic responses to alternating gratings before and after section of the optic nerve. Science. 1981;211: 953-955. (Pubitemid 11141462)
2. Zrenner E. The physiological basis of the pattern electroretinogram. In: Osborne N, Chader G, eds. Progress in Retinal Research. Oxford: Pergamon Press; 1990: 427-464. (Pubitemid 20096529)
3. Ventura LM, Sorokac N, De Los Santos R, et al. The relationship between retinal ganglion cell function and retinal nerve fiber thickness in early glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47: 3904-3911. (Pubitemid 46049515)
4. Bach M, Hoffmann MB. Update on the pattern electroretinogram in glaucoma. Optom Vis Sci. 2008;85: 386-395.
5. Porciatti V, Ventura LM. Physiologic significance of steadystate pattern electroretinogram losses in glaucoma: clues from simulation of abnormalities in normal subjects. J Glaucoma. 2009;18: 535-542.
6. Bayer AU, Maag KP, Erb C. Detection of optic neuropathy in glaucomatous eyes with normal standard visual fields using a test battery of short-wavelength automated perimetry and pattern electroretinography. Ophthalmology. 2002;109: 1350-1361. (Pubitemid 34700930)
7. Ventura LM, Porciatti V, Ishida K, et al. Pattern electroretinogram abnormality and glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2005;112: 10-19. (Pubitemid 40075312)
8. Bowd C, Vizzeri G, Tafreshi A, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of pattern electroretinogram optimized for glaucoma detection. Ophthalmology. 2009;116: 437-443.
9. Tafreshi A, Racette L, Weinreb RN, et al. Pattern Electroretinogram and Psychophysical Tests of Visual Function for Discriminating Between Healthy and Glaucoma Eyes. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 2010;149: 488-495.
10. Bowd C, Tafreshi A, Zangwill LM, et al. Pattern electroretinogram association with spectral domain-OCT structural measurements in glaucoma. Eye (Lond). 2011;25: 224-232.
11. Bayer AU, Erb C. Short wavelength automated perimetry, frequency doubling technology perimetry, and pattern electroretinography for prediction of progressive glaucomatous standard visual field defects. Ophthalmology. 2002;109: 1009-1017. (Pubitemid 34465239)
12. Bach M, Unsoeld AS, Philippin H, et al. Pattern ERG as an early glaucoma indicator in ocular hypertension: a long-term, prospective study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47: 4881-4887. (Pubitemid 46586388)
13. Bode SF, Jehle T, Bach M. Pattern electroretinogram in glaucoma suspects: new findings from a longitudinal study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52: 4300-4306.
14. Prum BE, Friedman DS, Gedde SJ, et al. Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Suspect. American Academy of Ophthalmology, Preferred Practice Patterns Guidelines. 2010.
15. Gordon MO, Kass MA. The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: design and baseline description of the participants. Arch Ophthalmol. 1999;117: 573-583. (Pubitemid 29218422)
16. Oner A, Gumus K, Arda H, et al. Pattern electroretinographic recordings in eyes with myopia. Eye Contact Lens. 2009;35: 238-241.
17. Porciatti V, Ventura LM. Normative data for a user-friendly paradigm for pattern electroretinogram recording. Ophthalmology. 2004;111: 161-168. (Pubitemid 38032225)
18. Yang A, Swanson WH. A new pattern electroretinogram paradigm evaluated in terms of user friendliness and agreement with perimetry. Ophthalmology. 2007;114: 671-679. (Pubitemid 46483690)
19. Fredette MJ, Anderson DR, Porciatti V, et al. Reproducibility of pattern electroretinogram in glaucoma patients with a range of severity of disease with the new glaucoma paradigm. Ophthalmology. 2008;115: 957-963. (Pubitemid 351756511)
20. Bowd C, Tafreshi A, Vizzeri G, et al. Repeatability of pattern electroretinogram measurements using a new paradigm optimized for glaucoma detection. J Glaucoma. 2009;18: 437-442.
21. Bach M, Schumacher M. The influence of ambient room lighting on the pattern electroretinogram (PERG). Doc Ophthalmol. 2002;105: 281-289. (Pubitemid 36018749)
22. Ventura LM, Porciatti V. Pattern electroretinogram in glaucoma. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2006;17: 196-202. (Pubitemid 43790817)
23. Chauhan BC, Garway-Heath DF, Goni FJ, et al. Practical recommendations for measuring rates of visual field change in glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 2008;92: 569-573. (Pubitemid 351497993)
24. Schumann J, Orgül S, Gugleta K, et al. Interocular difference in progression of glaucoma correlates with interocular differences in retrobulbar circulation. American journal of ophthalmology. 2000;129: 728-733. (Pubitemid 30604150)
25. Artes PH, Chauhan BC. Signal/noise analysis to compare tests for measuring visual field loss and its progression. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50: 4700-4708.
26. Mansberger SL, Medeiros FA, Gordon M. Diagnostic Tools for Calculation of Glaucoma Risk. Survey of Ophthalmology. 2008;53:S11-S16.
27. Shah NN, Bowd C, Medeiros FA, et al. Combining structural and functional testing for detection of glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2006;113: 1593-1602. (Pubitemid 44292333)
28. Ozturk F, Yavas GF, Kusbeci T, et al. A comparison among Humphrey field analyzer, Microperimetry, and Heidelberg Retina Tomograph in the evaluation of macula in primary open angle glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2008;17: 118-121. (Pubitemid 351412400)
29. Casas-Llera P, Rebolleda G, Munoz-Negrete FJ, et al. Visual field index rate and event-based glaucoma progression analysis: comparison in a glaucoma population. Br J Ophthalmol. 2009;93: 1576-1579.
30. Pfeiffer N, Tillmon B, Bach M. Predictive value of the pattern electroretinogram in high-risk ocular hypertension. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993;34: 1710-1715. (Pubitemid 23120245)
31. Hood DC, Xu L, Thienprasiddhi P, et al. The pattern electroretinogram in glaucoma patients with confirmed visual field deficits. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46: 2411-2418. (Pubitemid 43119487)
32. Curcio CA, Allen KA. Topography of ganglion cells in human retina. J Comp Neurol. 1990;300: 5-25. (Pubitemid 20349476)
33. Hess RF, Baker CL Jr. Human pattern-evoked electroretinogram. J Neurophysiol. 1984;51: 939-951. (Pubitemid 14104219)
34. Drasdo N, Thompson DA, Arden GB. A comparison of pattern ERG amplitudes and nuclear layer thickness in different zones of the retina. Clin Vision Sciences. 1990;5: 415-420. (Pubitemid 20294598)
35. Yucel YH, Zhang Q, Weinreb RN, et al. Effects of retinal ganglion cell loss on magno-, parvo-, koniocellular pathways in the lateral geniculate nucleus and visual cortex in glaucoma. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2003;22: 465-481. (Pubitemid 36556145)
36. Gupta N, Yucel YH. Glaucoma as a neurodegenerative disease. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2007;18: 110-114.
37. Duncan RO, Sample PA, Weinreb RN, et al. Retinotopic organization of primary visual cortex in glaucoma: Comparing fMRI measurements of cortical function with visual field loss. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2007;26: 38-56. (Pubitemid 44894993)
38. Lam DY, Kaufman PL, Gabelt BT, et al. Neurochemical correlates of cortical plasticity after unilateral elevated intraocular pressure in a primate model of glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44: 2573-2581. (Pubitemid 36621432)