Parietal substrates for dimensional effects in visual search: Evidence from lesion-symptom mapping

Brain

Volumn 136, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 751-760

  Utz, Sandra ^a,b   Humphreys, Glyn W ^c   Chechlacz, Magdalena ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BAMBERG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

brain lesions; dimension weighting; visual search; voxel based morphometry

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ATTENTION DEFICIT DISORDER; BRAIN DAMAGE; BRAIN MAPPING; BRAIN REGION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFERIOR PARIETAL LOBULE; INTRAPARIETAL SULCUS; MALE; MEMORY DISORDER; PARIETAL CORTEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL CORTEX; VOXEL BASED MORPHOMETRY; WORKING MEMORY;

EID: 84874895984     PISSN: 00068950     EISSN: 14602156     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/brain/awt003     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Ashburner J, Friston KJ. Voxel-based morphometry -the methods. NeuroImage 2000; 11: 805-21.
2. Ashburner J, Friston KJ. Unified segmentation. NeuroImage 2005; 26: 839-51.
3. Bickerton WL, Samson D, Williamson J, Humphreys GW. Separating forms of neglect using the Apples Test: validation and functional prediction in chronic and acute stroke. Neuropsychology 2011; 25: 567-80.
4. Bundesen C. A theory of visual attention. Psychol Rev 1990; 97: 523-47.
5. Chechlacz M, Rotshtein P, Bickerton W-L, Hansen PC, Deb S, Humphreys GW. Separating neural correlates of allocentric and egocentric neglect: distinct cortical sites and common white matter disconnections. Cognit Neuropsychol 2010; 27: 277-303.
6. Chechlacz M, Rotshtein P, Hansen PC, Riddoch JM, Deb S, Humphreys GW. The neural underpinings of simultanagnosia: disconnecting the visuospatial attention network. J Cogn Neurosci 2012; 24: 718-35.
7. Chechlacz M, Rotshtein P, Hansen PC, Deb S, Riddoch MJ, Humphreys GW. The central role of the temporo-parietal junction and the superior longitudinal fasciculus in supporting multi-item competition: Evidence from lesion-symptom mapping of extinction. Cortex 2011, doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2011.11.008. [Epub ahead of print].
8. Corsi PM. Human memory and the medial temporal region of the brain. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Montreal, Canada: McGill University; 1972.
9. Crinion J, Ashburner J, Leff A, Brett M, Price C, Friston K. Spatial normalization of lesioned brains: performance evaluation and impact on fMRI analyses. NeuroImage 2007; 37: 866-75.
10. Duncan J, Humphreys GW. Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychol Rev 1989; 96: 433-58.
11. Duvernoy HM, Cabanis EA, Vannson JL. The Human brain surface, three-dimensional sectional anatomy and MRI. Wien: Springer-Verlag; 1991.
12. Evans AC, Collins DL, Mills SR, Brown RD, Kelly RL, Peters TM. 3D statistical neuroanatomical models from 305 MRI volumes. IEEE Nucl Sci Symp Med Imag Conf 1993; 3: 1813-17.
13. Found A, Müller HJ. Searching for unknown feature targets on more than one dimension: further evidence for a dimension weighting account. Percept Psychophys 1996; 58: 88-101.
14. Gillebert CR, Dyrholm M, Vangkilde S, Kyllingsbæk S, Peeters R, Vandenberghe R. Attentional priorities and access to short-term memory: parietal interactions. NeuroImage 2012.
15. Gramann K, Töllner T, Krummenacher J, Eimer M, Müller HJ. Brain electrical correlates of dimensional weighting: an ERP study. Psychophysiology 2007; 44: 277-92.
16. Gramann K, Töllner T, Müller HJ. Dimension-based attention modulates early visual processing. Psychophysiology 2010; 47: 968-78.
17. Humphreys GW, Bickerton W-L, Samson D, Riddoch M. Birmingham Cognitive Screen (BCoS). Hove: Psychology Press; 2012.
18. Kanwisher N, Wojciulik E. Visual attention: insights from brain imaging. Nat Rev Neurosci 2000; 1: 91-100.
19. Kiebel S, Holmes A. The General Linear Model. In: Frackowiak RSJ, Friston KJ, Frith C, et al. editors. Human brain function. London: Academic Press; 2003. p. 881-6.
20. Kristjá nsson Á , Vuilleumier P, Malhotra P, Husain M, Driver J. Priming of color and position during visual search in unilateral spatial neglect. J Cognit Neurosci 2005; 1: 859-73.
21. Leff AP, Schofield TM, Crinion JT, Seghier ML, Grogan A, Green DW, et al. The left superior temporal gyrus is a shared substrate for auditory short-term memory and speech comprehension: evidence from 210 patients with stroke. Brain 2009; 132: 3401-10.
22. Malhotra P, Jäger HR, Parton A, Greenwood R, Playford ED, Brown MM, et al. Spatial working memory capacity in unilateral neglect. Brain 2005; 128: 424-35.
23. Maljkovic V, Nakayama K. Priming of popout: I. Role of features. Mem Cognit 1994; 22: 657-72.
24. Mort DJ, Malhotra P, Mannan SK, Rorden C, Pambakian A, Kennard C, et al. The anatomy of visual neglect. Brain 2003; 126: 1986-97.
25. Müller HJ, Heller D, Ziegler J. Visual search for singleton feature targets within and across feature dimensions. Percept Psychophys 1995; 57: 1-17.
26. Müller HJ, O'Grady RB. Dimension-based visual attention modulates dual-judgment accuracy in Duncan's (1984) one-versus two-object report paradigm. J Exp Psychol Hum 2000; 26: 1332-51.
27. Olivers C, Humphreys GW. Spatiotemporal segregation in visual search: evidence from parietal lesions. J Exp Psychol Hum 2004; 30: 667-8.
28. Pollmann S, Mahn K, Reimann B, Weidner R, Tittgemeyer M, Preul C, et al. Selective visual dimension weighting deficit after left lateral frontopolar lesions. J Cogn Neurosci 2007; 19: 365-75.
29. Pollmann S, Weidner R, Müller HJ, von Cramon DY. A fronto-posterior network involved in visual dimension changes. J Cognit Neurosci 2000; 12: 480-94.
30. Pollmann S, Weidner R, Müller HJ, von Cramon DY. Neural correlates of visual dimension weighting. Vis Cogn 2006; 14: 877-97.
31. Price CJ, Seghier ML, Leff AP. Predicting language outcome and recovery after stroke: the PLORAS system. Nat Rev Neurol 2010; 6: 202-21.
32. Robertson IH. Digit span and visual neglect: a puzzling relationship. Neuropsychologia 1990; 28: 217-22.
33. Seghier ML, Ramlackhansingh A, Crinion J, Leff AP, Price CJ. Lesion identification using unified segmentation-normalisation models and fuzzy clustering. NeuroImage 2008; 41: 1253-66.
34. Stamatakis EA, Tyler LK. Identifying lesions on structural brain images -Validation of the method and application to neuropsychological patients. Brain Lang 2005; 94: 167-77.
35. Töllner T, Gramann K, Müller HJ, Kiss M, Eimer M. Electrophysiological markers of visual dimension changes and reponse changes. J Exp Psychol Hum 2008; 34: 531-42.
36. Treisman AM. Features and objects. The fourteenth Bartlett memorial lecture. Q J Exp Psychol 1988; 40A: 201-37.
37. Weidner R, Pollmann S, Müller HJ, von Cramon DY. Top-down controlled visual dimension weighting: an event-related fMRI study. Cereb Cortex 2002; 12: 318-28.
38. Wolfe JM, Butcher SJ, Lee C, Hyle M. Changing your mind: on the contributions of top-down and bottom-up guidance in visual search for feature singletons. J Exp Psychol Hum 2003; 29: 483-502.
39. Woolsey TA, Hanaway J, Gado MH. The brain atlas a visual guide to the human central nervous system. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 2008.
40. Worsley KJ. Developments in random field theory. In: Frackowiak RSJ, Friston KJ, Frith C, et al. editors. Human brain function. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 2003. p. 881-6.
41. Xu Y, Chun MM. Dissociable neural mechanisms supporting visual short-term memory for objects. Nature 2006; 440: 91-5.