Recalibrating the ratio: Enacting accountability in intimate relationships using shared calendars

Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 203-213

  Thayer, Alexander ^a   Sirjani, Behzod ^b   Lee, Charlotte P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Accountability; Calendars; Intimacy; Qualitative research; Relationship work

Indexed keywords

ACCOUNTABILITY; CALENDARS; INTIMACY; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; RELATIONSHIP WORK;

INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SYSTEMS; ONLINE SYSTEMS;

COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK;

EID: 84874894014     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2441776.2441801     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. Beech, S., Geelhoed, E., Murphy, R., Parker, J., Sellen, A., and Shaw, K. The Lifestyles of Working Parents. Technical Report HPL-2003-88R1 HP Labs (2004).
2. Crabtree, A., Hemmings, T., and Rodden, T. Informing the Development of Calendar Systems for Domestic Use. in Proc. of the Eighth European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, (Helsinki, Finland, 2003), Kluwer Academic Publishers, 119-138.
3. Dossick, C. F. and Neff, G. Messy talk and clean technology: communication, problem-solving and collaborating using Building Information Modelling. Engineering Project Organization Journal, 1, 2 (2011), 83-93.
4. Ehrlich, S.F. Social and psychological factors influencing the design of office communications systems. In Proc. CHI 1987, ACM Press (1987), 323- 329.
5. Erickson, T. and Kellogg, W. A. Social Translucence: An Approach to Designing Systems that Mesh with Social Processes. In Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, ACM Press (2000), Vol. 7, No. 1, 59-83.
6. Eriksén, S. Designing for Accountability. In NordiCHI, ACM Press (2002), 177-186.
7. Fehr, B. Friendship Processes. Sage Publications (1986).
8. Garfinkel, H. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Prentice- Hall (1967).
9. Grimes, A. and Brush, A.J. Life scheduling to support multiple social roles. In Proc. CHI 2008, ACM Press (2008), 821-824.
10. Grudin, J. A case study of calendar use in an organization. SIGOIS Bull. 17, 3 (1996), 49-51.
11. Kincaid, C.M., Dupont, P.D. and Kaye, A.R. Electronic Calendars in the Office: An Assessment of User Needs and Current Technology. ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems 3, 1 (1985), 89-102.
12. Lynch, M. Against Reflexivity as an Academic Virtue and Source of Privileged Knowledge. Theory, Culture & Society 17, 3 (2000), 26-54.
13. McKnight, D.H., Cummings, L.L., and Chervany, N.L. Initial Trust Formation in New Organizational Relationships. Academy of Management Review 23, 3 (1998), 473-490.
14. Neustaedter, C., Brush, A.J., and Greenberg, S. The calendar is crucial: Coordination and awareness through the family calendar. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 16, 1 (2009), 1-48.
15. Neustaedter, C., Brush, A.J., and Greenberg, S. A digital family calendar in the home: lessons from field trials of LINC. In Proc. of Graphics Interface 2007, ACM Press (2007), 199-220.
16. Orlikowski, W.J., and Yates, J.A. It's about Time: Temporal Structuring in Organizations. Organization Science, 13, 6, (2002) 684-700.
17. Palen, L. and Grudin, J. Discretionary adoption of group support software: lessons from calendar applications. In B.E. Munkvold (Ed.) Implementing Collaboration Technologies in industry: Case Examples and Lessons Learned, (2003), 159-179.
18. Palen, L. Social, individual and technological issues for groupware calendar systems. In Proc. CHI 1999, ACM Press (1999), 17-24.
19. Palen, L. Calendars on the New Frontier: Challenges of Groupware Technology. Dissertation, Info. & Computer Science, UC Irvine (1998).
20. Paul, P. A Paper Calendar? It's 2011, The New York Times. Retrieved April 28, 2012 from The New York Times: www.nytimes.com/2011/07/31/fashion/ calendarwars-pit-electronics-against-paper.html.
21. Payne, S.J. Understanding calendar use. Human- Computer Interaction 8, 2 (1993), 83-100.
22. Plaisant, C., Clamage, A., Hutchinson, H.B., Bederson, B.B. and Druin, A. Shared family calendars: promoting symmetry and accessibility. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 13, 3 (2006), 313-46.
23. Prager, K.J. and Roberts, L.J. Deep Intimate Connection: Self and Intimacy in Couple Relationships. In D.J. Mashek and A. Aron (Eds.) Handbook of Closeness and Intimacy. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates (2004), 43-60.
24. Rusbult, C. E., Kumashiro, M., Coolsen, M. K., & Kirchner, J. L. Interdependence, Closeness, and Relationships. In D.J. Mashek and A. Aron (Eds.) Handbook of Closeness and Intimacy. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates (2004), 137-161.
25. Sanderson, C. A., and Evans, S. M. Seeing one's partner through intimacy-colored glasses: An examination of the processes underlying the intimacy goals-relationship satisfaction link. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 4 (2001), 463-473.
26. Thayer, A., Lee, C.P., Derthick, K., and Bietz, M.J. I Love You, Let's Share Calendars: Calendar Sharing as Relationship Work. In Proc. CSCW 2012, ACM Press (2012), 749-758.
27. Troshynski, E., Lee, C.P., and Dourish, P. Accountabilities of Presence: Reframing Location- Based Systems. In Proc. CHI 2008, ACM Press (2008) 487-496.
28. Tungare, M., Pérez-Quiñones, M.A. and Sams, A. An Exploratory Study of Calendar Use. arXiv:0809.3447v1.
29. van den Hooff, B. Electronic coordination and collective action: use and effects of electronic calendar and scheduling. Information & Management 42, 1 (2004), 103-114.
30. Van Lear, A., Koerner, A. F., & Allen, D. Relationship Typologies. In A. Vangelisti and D. Perlmann, (Eds.) The Cambridge Handbook of Personal Relationships. Cambridge University Press (2006), 91-111.