I love you, let's share calendars: Calendar sharing as relationship work

Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 749-758

  Thayer, Alexander ^a   Bietz, Matthew J ^b   Derthick, Katie ^a   Lee, Charlotte P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

calendars; groupware; intimacy; relationship work

Indexed keywords

AS RELATIONSHIPS; CALENDARS; EMOTIONAL INFORMATION; INTIMACY; RELATIONSHIP WORK; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEWS; USER STUDY; WORK ACTIVITIES;

GROUPWARE; INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SYSTEMS; ONLINE SYSTEMS;

COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK;

EID: 84863286748     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2145204.2145317     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (36)

1. Ames, M.G., Go, J., Kaye, J., and Spasojevic, M. Understanding technology choices and values through social class. In Proc. CSCW 2011, ACM Press (2011), 55-64.
2. Beech, S., Geelhoed, E., Murphy, R., Parker, J., Sellen, A., and Shaw, K. The lifestyles of working parents. Tech. rep. HPL-2003-88R1, HP Labs (2004).
3. Boehner, K., DePaula, R., Dourish, P., and Sengers, P. How emotion is made and measured. Int. J. Human-Computer Studies 65 (2007), 275-291. (Pubitemid 46216836)
4. Boehner, K., DePaula, R., Dourish, P., and Sengers, P. Affect: From Information to Interaction. In Proc. CC 2005, ACM Press (2005), 59-68.
5. Brush, A.B. and Turner, T.C. A survey of personal and household scheduling. In Proc. ACM SIGGROUP 2005, ACM Press, (2005), 330-331.
6. Cahill, S.E. Together Alone: Personal Relationships in Public Places. Contemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews 36, 1 (2007), 32-34.
7. Cahill, S.E. Notably gendered relations: Relationship work in early adolescents' notes. In B. Baron & H. Kotthoff (Eds.) Gender in interaction: Perspectives on femininity and masculinity in ethnography and discourse, (2001), 75-97.
8. Clark, M.S. and Brissette, I. Two Types of Relationship Closeness and Their Influence on People's Emotional Lives. In R.J. Davidson, K.R. Scherer, and H.H. Goldsmith (Eds.) Handbook of Affective Sciences, (2003), 824-835.
9. Crabtree, A., Hemmings, T., Rodden, T., and Mariani, J. Informing the development of calendar systems for domestic use. In Proc. ECSCW 2003, Kluwer Academic Publishers (2003), 119-138.
10. Dourish, P. and Anderson, K. Collective Information Practice: Exploring Privacy and Security as Social and Cultural Phenomena. Human-Computer Interaction 21, 3 (2006), 319-342. (Pubitemid 44430615)
11. Ehrlich, S.F. Social and psychological factors influencing the design of office communications systems. In Proc. CHI 1987, ACM Press (1987), 323-329.
12. Fehr, B. Friendship Processes. Sage Publications (1986).
13. Grimes, A. and Brush, A. Life scheduling to support multiple social roles. In Proc. CHI 2008, ACM Press (2008), 821-824.
14. Grudin, J. Why CSCW Applications Fail: Problems In The Design And Evaluation Of Organizational Interfaces. In Proc. CSCW 1988, ACM Press (1988), 85-93.
15. Grudin, J. A case study of calendar use in an organization. SIGOIS Bull. 17, 3 (1996), 49-51.
16. Grudin, J. and Palen, L. Why Groupware Succeeds: Discretion or Mandate? In Proc. ECSCW 1995, ACM Press (1995), 263-278.
17. Höök, K., Ståhl, A., Sundström, P., and Laaksolahti, J. Interactional Empowerment. In Proc. CHI 2008, ACM Press (2008), 647-656.
18. Kelley, J.F. and Chapanis, A. How professional persons keep their calendars: Implications for computerization. Journal of Occupational Psychology 55 (1982), 241-256.
19. Kincaid, C.M., Dupont, P.D. and Kaye, A.R. Electronic Calendars in the Office: An Assessment of User Needs and Current Technology. ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems 3, 1 (1985), 89-102.
20. Laurenceau, J-P, Rivera, L.M., Schaffer, A.R., and Pietromonaco, P.R. Intimacy as an Interpersonal Process: Current Status and Future Directions. In D.J. Mashek and A. Aron (Eds.) Handbook of Closeness and Intimacy, (2004), 61-78.
21. Mosier, J.N. and Tammaro, S.G. When Are Group Scheduling Tools Useful? Computer Supported Cooperative Work: The Journal of Collaborative Computing 6, 1 (1997), 53-70. (Pubitemid 127508301)
22. Neustaedter, C., Brush, A.J., and Greenberg, S. The calendar is crucial: Coordination and awareness through the family calendar. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 16, 1 (2009), 1-48.
23. Neustaedter, C., Brush, A.J., and Greenberg, S. A Digital Family Calendar in the Home: Lessons from Field Trials of LINC. In Proc. of Graphics Interface 2007, ACM Press (2007), 199-220.
24. Palen, L. and Grudin, J. Discretionary adoption of group support software: lessons from calendar applications. In B.E. Munkvold (Ed.) Implementing Collaboration Technologies in industry: Case Examples and Lessons Learned, (2003), 159-179.
25. Palen, L. Social, individual and technological issues for groupware calendar systems. In Proc. CHI 1999, ACM Press (1999), 17-24.
26. Palen, L. Calendars on the New Frontier: Challenges of Groupware Technology. Dissertation, UC Irvine (1998).
27. Payne, S.J. Understanding calendar use. Human-Computer Interaction 8, 2 (1993), 83-100.
28. Plaisant, C., Clamage, A., Hutchinson, H.B., Bederson, B.B. and Druin, A. Shared family calendars: promoting symmetry and accessibility. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 13, 3 (2006), 313-46. (Pubitemid 44895284)
29. Planalp, S. and Rivers, M. Changes in Knowledge of Personal Relationships. In G.J.O. Fletcher and J. Fitness (Eds.) Knowledge Structures in Close Relationships: A Social Psychological Approach, (1996), 299-324.
30. Prager, K.J. and Roberts, L.J. Deep Intimate Connection: Self and Intimacy in Couple Relationships. In D.J. Mashek and A. Aron (Eds.) Handbook of Closeness and Intimacy, (2004), 43-60.
31. Tomitsch, M., Grechenig, T. and Wascher, P. Personal and private calendar interfaces support private patterns: diaries, relations, emotional expressions. In Proc. NordiCHI 2006, ACM Press (2006), 401-404. (Pubitemid 47112356)
32. Tullio, J. and Mynatt, E.D. Use and Implications of a Shared, Forecasting Calendar. In Proc. INTERACT 2007, Springer-Berlin (2007), 269-282.
33. Tungare, M., Pérez-Quiñones, M.A. and Sams, A. An Exploratory Study of Calendar Use. arXiv:0809.3447v1.
34. van den Hooff, B. Electronic coordination and collective action: use and effects of electronic calendar and scheduling. Info & Management 42, 1 (2004), 103-114.
35. Venkatesh, A. Digital home technologies and transformation of households. Information Systems Frontiers 10, 4 (2008), 391-395.
36. Vetere, F., Gibbs, M. R., Kjeldskov, J., Howard, S., Mueller, F., Pedell, S., Mecoles, K., and Bunyan, M. Mediating intimacy: designing technologies to support strong-tie relationships. In Proc. CHI 2005, ACM Press (2005), 471-480.