In silico vascular modeling for personalized nanoparticle delivery

Nanomedicine

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 343-357

  Hossain, Shaolie S ^a,b   Zhang, Yongjie ^c   Liang, Xinghua ^c   Hussain, Fazle ^d   Ferrari, Mauro ^a   Hughes, Thomas Jr ^b   Decuzzi, Paolo ^a,e  

^a HOUSTON METHODIST RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^c CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY MAGNA GRAECIA OF CATANZARO   (Italy)

Author keywords

mathematical modeling; nanoparticle; patient specific; personalized medicine; rational design; vascular adhesion; wall shear rate

Indexed keywords

NANOPARTICLE;

ARTICLE; CARDIOVASCULAR FUNCTION; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; COMPUTER MODEL; IN VITRO STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 84874847729     PISSN: 17435889     EISSN: 17486963     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2217/nnm.12.124     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Weinshilboum R. Genomic medicine -inheritance and drug response. N. Engl. J. Med. 348(6), 529-537 (2003)
2. Evans WE, Mcleod HL. Drug therapy -pharmacogenomics -drug disposition, drug targets, and side effects. N. Engl. J. Med. 348(6), 538-549 (2003)
3. Kent DM, Hayward RA. Limitations of applying summary results of clinical trials to individual patients -the need for risk stratification. JAMA 298(10), 1209-1212 (2007)
4. Ghosh S, Matsuoka Y, Asai Y, Hsin KY, Kitano H. Software for systems biology: from tools to integrated platforms. Nat. Rev. Genet. 12(12), 821-832 (2011)
5. Vizirianakis IS. Nanomedicine and personalized medicine toward the application of pharmacotyping in clinical practice to improve drug-delivery outcomes. Nanomedicine (Lond.) 7(1), 11-17 (2011)
6. Nie S. Nanotechnology for personalized and predictive medicine. Nanomedicine (Lond.) 2(4), 305 (2006)
7. Michor F, Liphardt J, Ferrari M, Widom J. What does physics have to do with cancer? Nat. Rev. Cancer 11(9), 657-670 (2011)
8. Peer D, Karp JM, Hong S, Farokhzad OC, Margalit R, Langer R. Nanocarriers as an emerging platform for cancer therapy. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2(12), 751-760 (2007)
9. Sutradhar A, Paulino GH, Miller MJ, Nguyen TH. Topological optimization for designing patient-specific large craniofacial segmental bone replacements. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107(30), 13222-13227 (2010)
10. Williams JM, Adewunmi A, Schek RM et al. Bone tissue engineering using polycaprolactone scaffolds fabricated via selective laser sintering. Biomaterials 26(23), 4817-4827 (2005)
11. Hwang C-W, Wu D, Edelman ER. Physiological transport forces govern drug distribution for stent-based delivery. Circulation 104(5), 600-605 (2001)
12. Migliavacca F, Dubini G. Computational modeling of vascular anastomoses. Biomech. Model. Mechano. 3(4), 235-250 (2005)
13. Taylor CA, Hughes TJR, Zarins CK. Finite element modeling of three-dimensional pulsatile flow in the abdominal aorta: relevance to atherosclerosis. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 26(6), 975-987 (1998)
14. Hossain S, Hossainy S, Bazilevs Y, Calo V, Hughes T. Mathematical modeling of coupled drug and drug-encapsulated nanoparticle transport in patient-specific coronary artery walls. Comput. Mech. 49(2), 213-242 (2012)
15. Deisboeck TS, Wang Z, Macklin P, Cristini V. Multiscale cancer modeling. Ann. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 13(1), 127-155 (2011)
16. Swanson KR, Rockne RC, Claridge J, Chaplain MA, Alvord EC, Anderson AR. Quantifying the role of angiogenesis in malignant progression of gliomas: in silico modeling integrates imaging and histology. Cancer Res. 71(24), 7366-7375 (2011)
17. Schoeberl B, Eichler-Jonsson C, Gilles ED, Muller G. Computational modeling of the dynamics of the MAP kinase cascade activated by surface and internalized EGF receptors. Nat. Biotechnol. 20(4), 370-375 (2002)
18. Kim HJ, Vig.-Clementel IE, Coogan JS, Figueroa CA, Jansen KE, Taylor CA. Patient-specific modeling of blood flow and pressure in human coronary arteries. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 38(10), 3195-3209 (2010)
19. Torii R, Oshima M, Kobayashi T, Takagi K, Tezduyar TE. Fluid-structure interaction modeling of aneurysmal conditions with high and normal blood pressures. Comput. Mech. 38(4-5), 482-490 (2006)
20. Ladisa JF, Guler I, Olson LE et al. Three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics modeling of alterations in coronary wall shear stress produced by stent implantation. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 31(8), 972-980 (2003)
21. Decuzzi P, Pasqualini R, Arap W, Ferrari M. Intravascular delivery of particulate systems: does geometry really matter? Pharmaceut. Res. 26(1), 235-243 (2009)
22. Lee SY, Ferrari M, Decuzzi P. Design of bio-mimetic particles with enhanced vascular interaction. J. Biomech. 42(12), 1885-1890 (2009)
23. Van De Ven AL, Kim P, Haley OH et al. Rapid tumoritropic accumulation of systemically injected plateloid particles and their biodistribution. J. Control. Release 158(1), 148-155 (2012)
24. Rolland JP, Maynor BW, Euliss LE, Exner AE, Denison GM, Desimone JM. Direct fabrication and harvesting of monodisperse, shape-specific nanobiomaterials. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127(28), 10096-10100 (2005)
25. Chiappini C, Tasciotti E, Fakhoury JR et al. Tailored porous silicon microparticles: fabrication and properties. Chemphyschem 11(5), 1029-1035 (2010)
26. Champion JA, Katare YK, Mitragotri S. Making polymeric micro-and nanoparticles of complex shapes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104(29), 11901-11904 (2007)
27. Acharya G, Shin CS, Mcdermott M et al. The hydrogel template method for fabrication of homogeneous nano/microparticles. J. Control. Release 141(3), 314-319 (2010)
28. Zhang Y, Bazilevs Y, Goswami S, Bajaj CL, Hughes TJR. Patient-specific vascular NURBS modeling for isogeometric analysis of blood flow. Comput. Method. Appl. M. 196(29-30), 2943-2959 (2007)
29. Hughes TJR, Cottrell JA, Bazilevs Y. Isogeometric analysis: CAD, finite elements, NURBS, exact geometry and mesh refinement. Comput. Method. Appl. M. 194(39-41), 4135-4195 (2005)
30. Decuzzi P, Ferrari M. The adhesive strength of non-spherical particles mediated by specific interactions. Biomaterials 27(30), 5307-5314 (2006)
31. Gijsen FJH, Van De Vosse FN, Janssen JD. The influence of the non-Newtonian properties of blood on the flow in large arteries: steady flow in a carotid bifurcation model. J. Biomech. 32(6), 601-608 (1999)
32. Taylor CA, Humphrey JD. Open problems in computational vascular biomechanics: hemodynamics and arterial wall mechanics. Comput. Method. Appl. M. 198(45-46), 3514-3523 (2009)
33. Ballyk PD, Steinman DA, Ethier CR. Simulation of non-Newtonian blood flow in an end-to-end anastomosis. Biorheology 31, 565-586 (1994)
34. Bazilevs Y, Calo VM, Zhang Y, Hughes TJR. Isogeometric fluid-structure interaction analysis with applications to arterial blood flow. Comput. Mech. 38(4), 310-322 (2006)
35. Bazilevs Y, Calo VM, Cottrell JA, Hughes TJR, Reali A, Scovazzi G. Variational multiscale residual-based turbulence modeling for large eddy simulation of incompressible flows. Comput. Method. Appl. M. 197(1-4), 173-201 (2007)
36. Olgac U, Poulikakos D, Saur SC, Alkadhi H, Kurtcuoglu V. Patient-specific three-dimensional simulation of LDL accumulation in a human left coronary artery in its healthy and atherosclerotic states. Am. J. Physiol-Heart C 296(6), H1969-H1982 (2009)
37. Stangeby DK, Ethier CR. Computational analysis of coupled blood-wall arterial LDL transport. J. Biomech. Eng. 124(1), 1-8 (2002)
38. Liu J, Weller GER, Zern B et al. Computational model for nanocarrier binding to endothelium validated using in vivo, in vitro, and atomic force microscopy experiments. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107(38), 16530-16535 (2010)
39. Chung J, Hulbert GM. A time integration algorithm for structural dynamics with improved numerical dissipation: the generalized-a method. J. Appl. Mech. 60, 371-375 (1993)
40. Jansen KE, Whiting CH, Hulbert GM. A generalized-[alpha] method for integrating the filtered Navier-Stokes equations with a stabilized finite element method. Comput. Method. Appl. M. 190(3-4), 305-319 (2000)
41. Hossain SS. Mathematical modeling of coupled drug and drug-encapsulated nanoparticle transport in patient-specific coronary artery walls. Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Texas at Austin, TX, USA. PhD Thesis (2009)
42. Bazilevs Y, Da Veiga LB, Cottrell JA, Hughes TJR, Sangalli G. Isogeometric analysis: approximation, stability and error estimates for h-refined meshes. Math. Model. Meth. Appl. S. 16(7), 1031-1090 (2006)
43. Cottrell JA, Hughes TJR, Reali A. Studies of refinement and continuity in isogeometric structural analysis. Comput. Method. Appl. M. 196(41,44), 4160-4183 (2007)
44. Matsuo S, Tsuruta M, Hayano M et al. Phasic coronary-artery flow velocity determined by doppler flowmeter catheter in aortic-stenosis and aortic regulation. Am. J. Cardiol. 62(13), 917-922 (1988)
45. Johnston BM, Johnston PR, Corney S, Kilpatrick D. non-Newtonian blood flow in human right coronary arteries: transient simulations. J. Biomech. 39(6), 1116-1128 (2006)
46. Gawaz M, Langer H, May AE. Platelets in inflammation and atherogenesis. J. Clin. Invest. 115(12), 3378-3384 (2005)
47. Zarins CK, Giddens DP, Bharadvaj BK, Sottiurai VS, Mabon RF, Glagov S. Carotid bifurcation atherosclerosis. Quantitative correlation of plaque localization with flow velocity profiles and wall shear stress. Circulation Res. 53(4), 502-514 (1983)
48. Caro CG, Fitz-Gerald JM, Schroter RC. Atheroma and arterial wall shear observation, correlation and proposal of a shear dependent mass transfer mechanism for atherogenesis. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 177(1046), 109-133 (1971)
49. Feldman CL, Ilegbusi OJ, Hu Z, Nesto R, Waxman S, Stone PH. Determination of in vivo velocity and endothelial shear stress patterns with phasic flow in human coronary arteries: a methodology to predict progression of coronary atherosclerosis. Am. Heart J. 143(6), 931-939 (2002)
50. Ku D, Giddens D, Zarins C, Glagov S. Pulsatile flow and atherosclerosis in the human carotid bifurcation. Positive correlation between plaque location and low oscillating shear stress. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 5(3), 293-302 (1985)
51. Perktold K, Peter RO, Resch M, Langs G. Pulsatile non-newtonian blood flow in three-dimensional carotid bifurcation models: a numerical study of flow phenomena under different bifurcation angles. J. Biomed. Eng. 13(6), 507-515 (1991)
52. Charoenphol P, Mocherla S, Bouis D, Namdee K, Pinsky DJ, Eniola-Adefeso O. Targeting therapeutics to the vascular wall in atherosclerosis -carrier size matters. Atherosclerosis 217(2), 364-370 (2011)
53. Winter PM, Caruthers SD, Kassner A et al. Molecular Imaging of angiogenesis in nascent vx-2 rabbit tumors using a novel alpha(v) beta(3)-targeted nanoparticle and 1.5 tesla magnetic resonance imaging. Cancer Res. 63(18), 5838-5843 (2003)
54. Chen W, Jarzyna PA, Van Tilborg GaF et al. RGD peptide functionalized and reconstituted high-density lipoprotein nanoparticles as a versatile and multimodal tumor targeting molecular imaging probe. Faseb J. 24(6), 1689-1699 (2010)
55. Jokerst JV, Gambhir SS. Molecular imaging with theranostic nanoparticles. Accounts Chem. Res. 44(10), 1050-1060 (2011)
56. Ananta JS, Godin B, Sethi R et al. Geometrical confinement of gadolinium-based contrast agents in nanoporous particles enhances T(1) contrast. Nat. Nanotechnol. 5(11), 815-821 (2010)
57. Staquicini FI, Cardo-Vila M, Kolonin MG et al. Vascular ligand-receptor mapping by direct combinatorial selection in cancer patients. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108(46), 18637-18642 (2011)