Bursting your (Filter) bubble: Strategies for promoting diverse exposure

Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 95-100

  Resnick, Paul ^a   Garrett, R Kelly ^b   Kriplean, Travis ^c   Munson, Sean A ^c   Stroud, Natalie Jomini ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

Deliberative discourse; Diversity; Filter bubble; News; Personalization; Selective exposure

Indexed keywords

DELIBERATIVE DISCOURSE; DIVERSITY; FILTER BUBBLE; NEWS; PERSONALIZATIONS; SELECTIVE EXPOSURE;

INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SYSTEMS; SEARCH ENGINES;

COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK;

EID: 84874829819     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2441955.2441981     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. Frey, D., Recent Research on Selective Exposure to Information, in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. 1986. p. 41-80.
2. Hart, W., D. Albarracín, et al., Feeling validated versus being correct: a meta-analysis of selective exposure to information. Psychological bulletin, 2009. 135(4): p. 555.
3. Knobloch-Westerwick, S. and J. Meng, Reinforcement of the political self through selective exposure to political messages. Journal of Communication, 2011. 61(2): p. 349-368.
4. Stroud, N.J., Niche News: The Politics of News Choice: The Politics of News Choice. 2011: Oxford University Press, USA.
5. Stroud, N.J., Polarization and partisan selective exposure. Journal of Communication, 2010. 60(3): p. 556-576.
6. Ross, L., D. Greene, and P. House, The False Consensus Effect: An Egocentric Bias in Social Perception and Attribution Processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1977. 13: p. 279-301.
7. Sanders, G.S. and B. Mullen, Accuracy in perceptions of consensus: Differential tendencies of people with majority and minority positions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1982. 13(1): p. 57-70.
8. Dilliplane, S., All the news you want to hear: The impact of partisan news exposure on political participation. Public Opinion Quarterly, 2011. 75(2): p. 287-316.
9. Negroponte, N., Being Digital. 1996: Vintage.
10. Pariser, E., The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding from You. 2011, London: Penguin.
11. Iyengar, S. and K.S. Hahn, Red media, blue media: Evidence of ideological selectivity in media use. Journal of Communication, 2009. 59(1): p. 19-39.
12. Stroud, N.J., Media use and political predispositions: Revisiting the concept of selective exposure. Political Behavior, 2008. 30(3): p. 341-366.
13. Munson, S.A. and P. Resnick, Presenting diverse political opinions: how and how much, in Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Human factors in computing systems2010, ACM: Atlanta, Georgia, USA. p. 1457-1466.
14. Garrett, R.K., Politically motivated reinforcement seeking: Reframing the selective exposure debate. Journal of Communication, 2009. 59(4): p. 676-699.
15. Garrett, R.K., Echo chambers online?: Politically motivated selective exposure among Internet news users. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 2009. 14(2): p. 265-285.
16. Garrett, R.K., D. Carnahan, and E. Lynch, A turn toward avoidance? Selective exposure to online political information, 2004-2008. Political Behavior, 2011. Online First: p. 1-22.
17. Gentzkow, M. and J.M. Shapiro, Ideological Segregation Online and Offline. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2011. 126(4): p. 1799-1839.
18. Holbert, R.L., J.D. Hmielowski, and B.E. Weeks, Clarifying relationships between ideology and ideologically oriented cable TV news use: A case of suppression. Communication Research, 2012. 39(2): p. 194-216.
19. Garrett, R.K. and P. Resnick, Resisting political fragmentation on the Internet. Daedalus, 2011. 140(4): p. 108-120.
20. Park, S., S. Kang, et al., News Cube: delivering multiple aspects of news to mitigate media bias, in Proceedings of the 27th international conference on Human factors in computing systems2009, ACM: Boston, MA, USA. p. 443-452.
21. Meffert, M.F., S.E. Chung, et al., The Effects of Negativity and Motivated Information Processing During a Political Campaign. Journal of Communication, 2006. 56: p. 27-51.
22. MacKuen, M., J. Wolak, et al., Civic engagements: Resolute partisanship or reflective deliberation. American Journal of Political Science, 2010. 54(2): p. 440-458.
23. Sukumaran, A., S. Vezich, et al. Normative influences on thoughtful online participation. in PART 5-Proceedings of the 2011 annual conference on Human factors in computing systems. 2011. ACM.
24. Cohen, G.L., D.K. Sherman, et al., Bridging the partisan divide: Self-affirmation reduces ideological closed-mindedness and inflexibility in negotiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2007. 93(3): p. 415-430.
25. Kim, Y.M., How intrinsic and extrinsic motivations interact in selectivity: Investigating the moderating effects of situational information processing goals in issue publics' Web behavior. Communication Research, 2007. 34: p. 185-211.
26. Kriplean, T., J. Morgan, et al., Supporting reflective public thought with consider it, in Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work 2012, ACM: Seattle, Washington, USA. p. 265-274.
27. Schneider, J., T. Groza, and A. Passant, A review of argumentation for the Social Semantic Web. Semantic Web, 2012.
28. Murakami, K., E. Nichols, et al. Statement map: reducing web information credibility noise through opinion classification. in Proceedings of the fourth workshop on Analytics for noisy unstructured text data. 2010. ACM.
29. Kriplean, T., M. Toomim, et al., Is this what you meant?: promoting listening on the web with reflect, in Proceedings of the 2012 ACM annual conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2012, ACM: Austin, Texas, USA. p. 1559-1568.
30. Faridani, S., E. Bitton, et al. Opinion space: a scalable tool for browsing online comments. in Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Human factors in computing systems. 2010. ACM.
31. Kraut, R.E., P. Resnick, et al., Building Successful Online Communities: Evidence-Based Social Design. 2012, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.