Drawing practices in image-enabled collaboration

Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 741-751

  Snyder, Jaime ^a  

^a SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Collaborative visualization; Drawing; Image enabled discourse

Indexed keywords

BUILDING SYSTEMS; COLLABORATIVE TOOLS; COLLABORATIVE VISUALIZATION; FACE-TO-FACE CONVERSATION; IMAGE-ENABLED DISCOURSE; QUALITATIVE STUDY; SOCIAL INTERACTIONS; VISUAL REPRESENTATIONS;

DATA VISUALIZATION; DRAWING (GRAPHICS); GROUPWARE; INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SYSTEMS; RESEARCH;

COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK;

EID: 84874820107     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2441776.2441858     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (41)

1. Arnheim, R. Visual Thinking. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, 1969.
2. Bastéa-Forte, M. and Yen, C. Encouraging Contribution to Shared Sketches in Brainstorming Meetings. Working note in Proc. CHI 2007. ACM Press (2007), 2267-2272.
3. Bly, S.A., A use of drawing surfaces in different collaborative settings. Proc. CSCW '88, ACM Press (1988), 250-256.
4. Burgoon, J., Buller, D. and Floyd, K. Does Participation Affect Deception Success? Human Communication Research, 27 (4). 503-534.
5. Charmaz, K. The grounded theory method: An explication and interpretation. In Emerson, R.M. ed. Contemporary Field Research, Univ. California, Waveland Press, Prospect Heights, IL, 1983, 109-126.
6. Clark, H.H. Using Language. Cambridge Univ. Press, NY, NY, 1996.
7. Elkins, J. The Domain of Images. Cornell Univ. Press, Ithaca, NY, 1999.
8. Forlizzi, J. and DiSalvo, C. Microsketching: Creating Components of Complex Interactive Products and Systems. Proc. C&C '09, 87-95.
9. Fox, P. and Hendler, J. Changing the Equation on Scientific Data Visualization. Science, 331. 705-708.
10. Goffman, E. Footing. Semiotica, 25 (1/2). 1-29.
11. Goodwin, C. Participation, stance and affect in the organization of activities. Discourse & Society, 18 (1). 53-73.
12. Gumperz, J.J. Discourse Strategies. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK, 1982.
13. Hancock, J., Curry, L., Goorha, S. and Woodworth, M. Lies in conversation: An examination of deception using automated linguistic analysis. Proc. Cognitive Science Society (2004), 26. 534-540.
14. Hanks, W.F. Language & Communicative Practices. Westview Press, Boulder, CO, 1996.
15. Heath, C., Hindmarsh, J. and Luff, P. Video in Qualitative Rsearch: Analysing Social Interaction in Everyday Life. Sage Pub., Thousand Oaks, CA, 2010.
16. Henderson, K. Flexible Sketches and Inflexible Data Bases: Visual Communication, Conscription Devices, and Boundary Objects in Design Engineering. Science, Technology & Human Values, 16 (4). 448-473.
17. Isenberg, P., Elmqvist, N., Scholtz, K., Cernea, D., Ma, K.-L. and Hagen, H. Collaborative Visualization: Definition, Challenges, and Research Agenda. Information Visualization, 10 (4). 310-329.
18. Ishii, H. and Kobayashi, M. ClearBoard: A Seamless Medium for Shared Drawing and Conversation with Eye Contact. Proc. CHI 1992, ACM Press (1992). 525-706.
19. Jaffe, A. Stance: sociolinguistic perspectives. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2009.
20. Ju, W., Lee, B. and Klemmer, S. Range: Exploring Proxemics in Collaborative Whiteboard Interaction Proc. CHI 2007. ACM Press (2007), 2483-2487.
21. Mathison, S. Seeing is Believing: The Credibility of Image-Based Research and Evaluation. in Donaldon, S.I., Christie, C.A. and Mark, M.M. eds. What Counts as Credible Evidence in Applied Research and Evaluation Practice?, Sage Pub., London, 2009, 181- 196.
22. Nakatani, C., Grosz, B., Ahn, D. and Hirschberg, J. Instructions for annotating discourses, Center for Research in Computing Technology, Harvard Univ., Technical Report Number TR-21-95. Cambridge, MA, 1995.
23. Norris, S. Analyzing multimodal interaction: A methodological framework. Routledge, NY and London, 2004.
24. Orlikowski, W. Sociomaterial Practices: Exploring Technology at Work. Organization Studies, 28 (09). 1435-1448.
25. Pedersen, E.R., McCall, K., Moran, T.R. and Halasz, F.G. Tivoli: An Electronic Whiteboard for Informal Worksgoup Meetings. Proc. InterCHI 1993. 391-398.
26. Prante, T., Magerkurth, C. and Streitz, N. Developing CSCW Tools for Idea Finding- Empirical Results and Implications for Design. Proc. CSCW'02. ACM Press (2002), 106-115.
27. Rekimoto, J. A Multiple Device Approach for Supporting Whiteboard-based Interactions. Proc. CHI 1998. ACM Press (1998), 344-351.
28. Roth, W.-M. and McGinn, M.K. Inscriptions: Toward a Theory of Representing as Social Practice. Review of Ed. Research, 68 (1). 35-59.
29. Ryokai, K., Marti, S. and Ishii, H. I/O Brush: Drawing with Everyday Objects as Ink. Proc. CHI 2004. ACM Press (2004), 1-8.
30. Snyder, J. Activities & artifacts: the dual nature of image-making in communicative practice. Proc. iConference. ACM (2012), p.10-17.
31. Snyder, J. Image-Enabled Discourse: A Conceptual Framework. Paper presented at Intl. Visual Soc. Association (IVSA) Conference, (2011).
32. Tang, J.C. and Minneman, S.L. VideoDraw: A Video Interface for Collaborative Drawing. ACM Trans. on Info. Systems, 9 (2). 170-184.
33. Tannen, D. Framing in Discourse. Oxford University Press, NY, NY, 1993.
34. Tannen, D. What's in a Frame? Surface Evidence for Underlying Expectations. In Tannen, D. ed. Framing in Discourse, Oxford Univ. Press, NY, NY, 1993, 14- 56.
35. Tohidi, M., Buxton, W., Baecker, R. and Sellen, A. User Sketches: A Quick, Inexpensive, and Effective Way to Elicit More Reflective User Feedback. Proc. NordCHI, (2006). 105-114.
36. Tversky, B., Suwa, M., Agrawala, M., Heiser, J., Stolte, C., Hanrahan, P., Phan, D., Klingner, J., Daniel, M.P. and Lee, P. Sketches for design and design of sketches. In Lindemann, U. ed. Human Behavior in Design, Springer, Berlin, 2003, 79-86.
37. van der Lugt, R. Functions of Sketching in Design Idea Generation Meetings. Proc. C&C '02, 72-79.
38. van Dijk, T.A. Episodes as units of discourse analysis. In Tannen, D. ed. Analyzing Discourse: Text and Talk, Georgetown Univ. Press, Georgetown, DC, 1981, 177- 195.
39. Walny, J., Carpendale, S., Riche, N.H., Venolia, G. and Fawcett, P. Visual Thinking in Action: Visualizations as Used on Whiteboards. IEEE Transactions on Vis. and Comp. Graphics, 17 (12). 2508-2517.
40. Ware, C. Information Visualization: Perception for Design. Morgan Kauffman, SF, CA, 2000.
41. Weibel, N., Hofstetter, H., Signer, B., Jetter, H.-C., Norrie, M.C. and Reiterer, H. PaperSketch: A Paper- Digital Collaborative Remote Sketching Tool. Proc. IUI '11. (2011), 155-164.