Activities & artifacts: The dual nature of image-making in communicative practice

ACM International Conference Proceeding Series

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 10-17

  Snyder, Jaime ^a  

^a SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

ad hoc visualization; discourse analysis; image enabled discourse; multimodal interactional analysis; video data; visual information

Indexed keywords

DISCOURSE ANALYSIS; IMAGE-ENABLED DISCOURSE; MULTIMODAL INTERACTIONAL ANALYSIS; VIDEO DATA; VISUAL INFORMATION;

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; VISUALIZATION;

VISUAL COMMUNICATION;

EID: 84857662263     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2132176.2132178     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (33)

1. Beaudoin, J. The influence of domain knowledge, indexer experience and image type on image indexing, Proceedings of the 19th Workshop of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (ASIST) Special Interest Group in Classification Research., 2008.
2. Charmaz, K. The grounded theory method: An explication and interpretation. in Emerson, R.M. ed. Contemporary Field Research, University fo California, Waveland Press, Prospect Heights, IL, 1983, 109-126.
3. Cook, M.P. Visual representations in science education: The influence of prior knowledge and cognitive load theory on instructional design principles. Science Education, 90 (6).
4. Datta, R., Joshi, D., Li, J. and Wang, J.Z. Image retrieval: Ideas, influences, and trends of the new age. ACM Computing Surveys, 40 (2, Article 5).
5. Elkins, J. (ed.), The Domain of Images. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY, 1999.
6. Ellis, G. and Dix, A. An explorative analysis of user evaluation studies in information visualisation. Proceedings of BELIV 2006: AVI Workshop. 1-7.
7. Gibson, J.J. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Houghton Mifflin Co., Boston, MA, 1979.
8. Golomb, C. The Child's Creation of a Pictorial World. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, 1992.
9. Greisdorf, H. and O'Connor, B. Modelling what users see when they look at images: a cognitive viewpoint. Journal of Documentation, 58 (1). 6-29
10. Greisdorf, H. and O'Connor, B. What Do Users See? Exploring the cognitive nature of functional image retrieval. Proceedings of ASIST'02.
11. Hanks, W.F. Language & Communicative Practices. Westview Press, Boulder, CO, 1996.
12. Harris, B.R. Visual information literacy via visual means: three heuristics. Reference services review, 34 (2). 213.
13. Harrison, A.G. and Treagust, D.F. Learning about Atoms, Molecules, and Chemical Bonds: A Case Study of Multiple- Model Use in Grade 11 Chemistry. Science Education, 84 (3). 352-381.
14. Heer, J., Viégas, F.B. and Wattenberg, M. Voyagers and voyeurs: supporting asynchronous collaborative information visualization. Communications of the ACM, 52 (1). 87-97.
15. Huang, W., Eades, P. and Hong, S.-H., Beyond Time and Error: A Cognitive Approach to the Evaluation of graph Drawings. in BELIV '08, (Florence, Italy, 2008), ACM.
16. Jorgensen, C. Attributes of Images in Describing Tasks. Information Processing & Management, 34 (2/3). 161-174.
17. Jorgensen, C. Image retrieval: Theory and research. Scarecrow Press, Lanham, MD, 2003.
18. Kress, G. and Van Leeuwen, T. Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. Oxford University Press, New York, 2001.
19. Liebenberg, L., Didkowsky, N. and Ungar, M. Analysing image-based data using grounded theory. Visual Studies.
20. Liu, Y., Zhang, D., Lu, G. and Ma, W. A survey of contentbased image retrieval with high-level semantics. Pattern Recognition, 40 (1). 262-282.
21. McCay-Peet, L. and Toms, E. Image use within the work task model: Images as information and illustration. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 60 (12). 2416-2429.
22. Naps, T., Roflling, G., Anderson, J., Cooper, S., Dann, W., Fleischer, R., Koldehofe, B., Korhonen, A., Kuittinen, M. and Leska, C. Evaluating the Educational Impact of Visualization. SIGCSE Bulletin, 35 (4).
23. Norman, D.A. Affordance, conventions, and design. interactions, 6 (3). 38-41.
24. Norman, D.A. The psychology of everyday things. Basic Books, New York, NY, 1988.
25. Norris, S. Analyzing multimodal interaction: A methodological framework. Routledge, New York and London, 2004.
26. Ochs, E. Transcription as theory. Developmental pragmatics. 43-72.
27. Shneiderman, B. and Plaisant, C. Strategies for Evaluating Information Visualization Tools: Multi-dimensional In- Depth Long-term Case Studies. Proceedings of BELIV '06.
28. Snyder, J. Image-Enabled Discourse: A Conceptual Framework International Visual Sociology Association (IVSA) Conference, July 6-8, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, 2011.
29. Snyder, J. Image-Making as Discourse Strategy 17th Annual Conference on Language, Interaction and Social Organization (LISO), May 12-14, University of California, Santa Barbara, 2011.
30. Tufte, E.R. Envisioning Information. Graphics Press, Cheshire, Connecticut, 1990.
31. Tufte, E.R. The Visual Display of Quantitative Information. Graphics Press, Cheshire, Connecticut, 1983.
32. Tufte, E.R. Visual Explanations. Graphics Press, Cheshire, Connecticut, 1997.
33. Weedman, J. Thinking with images: An exploration into information retrieval and knowledge generation. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 39 (1). 376-382.