STEPS: A grid search methodology for optimized peptide identification filtering of MS/MS database search results

Proteomics

Volumn 13, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 766-770

  Piehowski, Paul D ^a   Petyuk, Vladislav A ^a   Sandoval, John D ^a   Burnum, Kristin E ^a   Kiebel, Gary R ^a   Monroe, Matthew E ^a   Anderson, Gordon A ^a   Camp, David G ^a   Smith, Richard D ^a  

^a PACIFIC NORTHWEST NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

Bioinformatics; Mass spectrometry; Optimization; Peptide identification; PSM filtering

Indexed keywords

ANTIBODY AFFINITY; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL CELL; CELL LYSATE; FILTRATION; MASS SPECTROMETRY; METHODOLOGY; PEPTIDE ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DATABASE; PROTEOMICS; SYSTEMATIC TRIAL AND ERROR PARAMETER SELECTION;

BACTERIAL PROTEINS; BLOOD PROTEINS; DATABASES, PROTEIN; HUMANS; PEPTIDE FRAGMENTS; PROTEINS; PROTEOMICS; SHEWANELLA; TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS);

EID: 84874798313     PISSN: 16159853     EISSN: 16159861     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201200096     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Aebersold, R., Mann, M., Mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nature 2003, 422, 198-207.
2. Ferguson, P. L., Smith, R. D., Proteome analysis by mass spectrometry. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomolec. Struct. 2003, 32, 399-424.
3. Cravatt, B. F., Simon, G. M., Yates, J. R., The biological impact of mass-spectrometry-based proteomics. Nature 2007, 450, 991-1000.
4. Yates, J. R., Eng, J. K., Mccormack, A. L., Schieltz, D., Method to correlate tandem mass-spectra of modified peptides to amino-acid-sequences in the protein database. Anal. Chem. 1995, 67, 1426-1436.
5. Fenyo, D., Beavis, R. C., A method for assessing the statistical significance of mass spectrometry-based protein identifications using general scoring schemes. Anal. Chem. 2003, 75, 768-774.
6. Perkins, D. N., Pappin, D. J. C., Creasy, D. M., Cottrell, J. S., Probability-based protein identification by searching sequence databases using mass spectrometry data. Electrophoresis 1999, 20, 3551-3567.
7. Kall, L., Storey, J. D., Maccoss, M. J., Noble, W. S., Assigning significance to peptides identified by tandem mass spectrometry using decoy databases. J. Proteome Res. 2008, 7, 29-34.
8. Zhang, B., Chambers, M. C., Tabb, D. L., Proteomic parsimony through bipartite graph analysis improves accuracy and transparency. J. Proteome Res. 2007, 6, 3549-3557.
9. Nesvizhskii, A. I., A survey of computational methods and error rate estimation procedures for peptide and protein identification in shotgun proteomics. J. Proteomics 2010, 73, 2092-2123.
10. Keller, A., Nesvizhskii, A. I., Kolker, E., Aebersold, R., Empirical statistical model to estimate the accuracy of peptide identifications made by MS/MS and database search. Anal. Chem. 2002, 74, 5383-5392.
11. Qian, W. J., Liu, T., Monroe, M. E., Strittmatter, E. F. et al., Probability-based evaluation of peptide and protein identifications from tandem mass spectrometry and SEQUEST analysis: the human proteome. J. Proteome Res. 2005, 4, 53-62.
12. Kim, S., Gupta, N., Pevzner, P. A., Spectral probabilities and generating functions of tandem mass spectra: a strike against decoy databases. J. Proteome Res. 2008, 7, 3354-3363.
13. Petyuk, V. A., Mayampurath, A. M., Monroe, M. E., Polpitiya, A. D. et al., DtaRefinery, a Software tool for elimination of systematic errors from parent ion mass measurements in tandem mass spectra data sets. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2010, 9, 486-496.
14. Cox, J., Mann, M., MaxQuant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized p.p.b.-range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quantification. Nat. Biotechnol. 2008, 26, 1367-1372.
15. Tabb, D. L., What's driving false discovery rates? J. Proteome Res. 2008, 7, 45-46.
16. Elias, J. E., Gygi, S. P., Target-decoy search strategy for increased confidence in large-scale protein identifications by mass spectrometry. Nat. Methods 2007, 4, 207-214.
17. Pieper, R., Su, Q., Gatlin, C. L., Huang, S. T. et al., Multi-component immunoaffinity subtraction chromatography: an innovative step towards a comprehensive survey of the human plasma proteome. Proteomics 2003, 3, 422-432.
18. Liu, T., Qian, W. J., Mottaz, H. M., Gritsenko, M. A. et al., Evaluation of multiprotein immunoaffinity subtraction for plasma proteomics and candidate biomarker discovery using mass spectrometry. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2006, 5, 2167-2174.
19. Livesay, E. A., Tang, K. Q., Taylor, B. K., Buschbach, M. A. et al., Fully automated four-column capillary LC-MS system for maximizing throughput in proteomic analyses. Anal. Chem. 2008, 80, 294-302.
20. Mayampurath, A. M., Jaitly, N., Purvine, S. O., Monroe, M. E. et al., DeconMSn: a software tool for accurate parent ion monoisotopic mass determination for tandem mass spectra. Bioinformatics 2008, 24, 1021-1023.
21. Zubarev, R., Mann, M., On the proper use of mass accuracy in proteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2007, 6, 377-381.
22. Ma, Z. Q., Dasari, S., Chambers, M. C., Litton, M. D. et al., IDPicker 2.0: improved protein assembly with high discrimination peptide identification filtering. J. Proteome Res. 2009, 8, 3872-3881.
23. Aylward, F. O., Burnum, K. E., Scott, J. J., Suen, G. et al., Metagenomic and metaproteomic insights into bacterial communities in leaf-cutter ant fungus gardens. ISME J. 2012, 6, 1688-1701.