Complements and substitutes in profiting from innovation - A choice experimental approach

Research Policy

Volumn 42, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 326-339

  Fischer, Timo ^a   Henkel, Joachim ^a,b  

^a TUM SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT   (Germany)

^b CEPR   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Complementarity; Patent paradox; Patents; Profiting from innovation; Value appropriation

Indexed keywords

INDUSTRY; MANAGERS;

APPROPRIABILITY MECHANISMS; COMPLEMENTARITY; CONTROLLED DIFFUSION; DISCRETE CHOICE EXPERIMENTS; EXPERIMENTAL APPROACHES; INTERNATIONAL COMMUNICATION; LEADTIME; MANAGERIAL IMPLICATIONS; OPEN STANDARDS; PATENT PARADOX; PATENT PORTFOLIO; PATENTS; TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION; VALUE APPROPRIATION;

PATENTS AND INVENTIONS;

EID: 84874773317     PISSN: 00487333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2012.06.004     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. C. Ai, and E.C. Norton Interaction terms in logit and probit models Economics Letters 80 2003 123 129
2. R.C. Allen Collective invention Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 4 1 1983 1 24
3. A. Arora, and M. Ceccagnoli Patent protection, complementary assets, and firms' incentives for technology licensing Management Science 52 2 2006 293 308
4. A. Arora, A. Fosfuri, and A. Gambardella Markets for Technology: The Economics of Innovation and Corporate Strategy 2001 MIT Press Cambridge, MA
5. A. Arora, and A. Gambardella Complementarity and external linkages: the strategies of the large firms in biotechnology Journal of Industrial Economics 38 4 1990 361 379
6. K.J. Arrow Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention R. Nelson, The Rate and Discretion of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors 1962 Princeton University Press Princeton, NJ 609 626
7. Athey, S.; Stern, S.; 1998. An empirical framework for testing theories about complementarity in organizational design. NBER Working Paper 6600. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA. http://www.nber.org/papers/ w6600.pdf (accessed 13.10.10).
8. S. Beggs, S. Cardell, and J. Hausman Assessing the potential demand for electric cars Journal of Econometrics 17 1 1981 1 19
9. R. Bekkers, G. Duysters, and B. Verspagen Intellectual property rights, strategic technology agreements and market structure: the case of GSM Research Policy 31 7 2002 1141 1161
10. Bessen, J.; Meurer, M.J.; 2005. The patent litigation explosion. Working paper no. 05-18. Boston University Law School, Boston, MA.
11. C. Boone, and W. Hendriks Top management team diversity and firm performance: moderators of functional-background and locus-of-control diversity Management Science 55 2 2009 165 180
12. D. Brownstone, and K. Train Forecasting new product penetration with flexible substitution patterns Journal of Econometrics 89 1-2 1999 109 129
13. G.S. Carpenter, and K. Nakamoto Consumer preference formation and pioneering advantage Journal of Marketing Research 26 1989 285 298
14. R.G. Chapman, and R. Staelin Exploiting rank ordered choice set data within the stochastic utility model Journal of Marketing Research 19 3 1982 288 301
15. H.W. Chesbrough Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology 2003 Harvard Business School Press Boston, MA
16. Cohen, W.M.; Nelson, R.R.; Walsh, J.P.; 2000. Protecting their intellectual assets: Appropriability conditions and why U.S. manufacturing firms patent (or not). NBER Working Paper no. w7552. National Bureau of Economics Research, Cambridge, MA.
17. E. Dechenaux, B. Goldfarb, S. Shane, and M. Thursby Appropriability and commercialization: evidence from MIT inventions Management Science 54 5 2008 893 906
18. N. Economides Network externalities, complementarities, and invitations to enter European Journal of Political Economy 12 2 1996 211 233
19. J. Farrell, and N.T. Gallini Second-sourcing as a commitment: monopoly incentives to attract competition Quarterly Journal of Economics 103 4 1988 673 694
20. C. Fehrshtman, V. Mahajan, and E. Muller Market share pioneering advantage: a theoretical approach Management Science 36 8 1990 900 918
21. Fischer, T.; Henkel, J.; Capturing value from innovation - diverging views of R&D and marketing managers. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2012.2190143, in press.
22. J.S. Gans, D.H. Hsu, and S. Stern The impact of uncertain intellectual property rights on the market for ideas: evidence from patent grant delays Management Science 54 5 2009 982 997
23. P.N. Golder, and G.J. Tellis Pioneer advantage: marketing logic or marketing legend? Journal of Marketing Research 30 1993 158 170
24. Graham, S.J.H.; Somaya, D.; 2006. Vermeers and rembrandts in the same attic: complementarity between copyright and trademark leveraging strategies in software. Working paper. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract-id= 887484 (accessed 13.10.10).
25. P.E. Green, and V. Srinivasan Conjoint analysis in marketing: new developments with implications for research and practice Journal of Marketing 54 4 1990 3 19
26. W. Greene Testing hypotheses about interaction terms in nonlinear models Economics Letters 107 2010 291 296
27. M. Gruber, F. Heinemann, M. Brettel, and S. Hungeling Configurations of resources and capabilities and their performance implications: an exploratory study on technology ventures Strategic Management Journal 31 12 2010 1337 1354
28. B.H. Hall Exploring the patent explosion A.N. Link, F.M. Scherer, Essays in Honor of Edwin Mansfield: The Economics of RD, Innovation, and Technological Change 2005 Springer New York 195 208
29. B.H. Hall, and R. Ziedonis The patent paradox revisited: an empirical study of patenting in the U.S. semiconductor industry, 1979-95 RAND Journal of Economics 32 1 2001 101 128
30. N. Harabi Appropriability of technical innovations: an empirical analysis Research Policy 24 6 1995 981 992
31. D. Harhoff, J. Henkel, and E. von Hippel Profiting from voluntary information spillovers: how users benefit by freely revealing their innovations Research Policy 32 10 2003 1753 1769
32. J.A. Hausman, and D.A. Wise A conditional probit model for qualitative choice: discrete decisions recognizing interdependence and heterogeneous preferences Econometrica 46 2 1978 403 426
33. J. Henkel Selective revealing in open innovation processes: the case of embedded Linux Research Policy 35 7 2006 953 969
34. G. Hoetker The use of logit and probit models in strategic management research: critical issues Strategic Management Journal 28 4 2007 331 343
35. T.R. Holcomb, R.M. Holmes Jr.; and B.L. Connelly Making the most of what you have: managerial ability as a source of resource value creation Strategic Management Journal 30 2009 457 485
36. A.R. Hole Fitting mixed logit models by using maximum simulated likelihood Stata Journal 7 3 2007 388 401
37. I. Horstman, G. MacDonald, and A. Slivinsky Patents as information transfer mechanism: to patent or (maybe) not to patent Journal of Political Economics 93 1985 837 858
38. C. Huang, and T.G. Shields Interpretation of interaction effects in logit and probit analyses: reconsidering the relationship between [U.S.] registration laws, education, and voter turnout American Politics Quarterly 28 1 2000 72 79
39. G. King, M. Tomz, and M.J. Wittenberg Making the most of statistical analyses: improving interpretation and presentation American Journal of Political Science 44 2 2000 347 361
40. Lamoreaux, N.R.; Sokoloff, K.L.; 1999. Inventive activity and the market for technology in the United States, 1840-1920. NBER Working paper no. w7107. National Bureau of Economics Research, Cambridge, MA.
41. J.O. Lanjouw, and M. Schankerman Protecting intellectual property rights: are small firms handicapped? Journal of Law Economics 47 1 2004 45 74
42. Laursen, K.; Salter, A.; 2005. My precious the role of appropriability strategies in shaping innovative performance. DRUID Working Paper no. 05-02. Available online http://www2.druid.dk/conferences/viewpaper.php?id=2583&cf= 17 (accessed 13.10.10).
43. D.F. Layton Random coefficient models for stated preference surveys Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 40 1 2000 21 26
44. A.E. Leiponen Competing through cooperation: the organization of standard setting in wireless telecommunications Management Science 54 11 2008 1904 1919
45. M.A. Lemley Ten things to do about patent holdup of standards (and one not to) Boston College Law Review 48 1 2007 article 6
46. R.C. Levin, A.K. Klevorick, R.R. Nelson, and S.G. Winter Appropriating the returns from industrial research and development Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 87 3 1987 783 831
47. D.A. Levinthal Adaption on rugged landscapes Management Science 43 7 1997 934 950
48. M.B. Lieberman, and D.B. Montgomery First-mover advantages Strategic Management Journal 9 1988 41 58
49. J.P. Liebeskind Knowledge, strategy, and the knowledge of the firm Strategic Management Journal 17 1996 93 107
50. J.S. Long, and J. Freese Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using Stata 2006 Stata Press College Station, TX
51. G.D. Markman, M.I. Espina, and P.H. Phan Patents as surrogates for inimitable and non-substitutable resources Journal of Management 30 4 2004 529 544
52. D. McFadden Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior P. Zarembka, Frontiers in Econometrics 1974 Academic Press New York 105 142
53. D. McFadden, and K. Train Mixed MNL models for discrete response Journal of Applied Econometrics 15 5 2000 447 470
54. P. Milgrom, and J. Roberts The economics of modern manufacturing: technology, strategy, and organization American Economic Review 80 3 1990 511 528
55. E.C. Norton, H. Wang, and C.R. Ai Computing interaction effects in logit and probit models Stata Journal 4 2 2004 154 167
56. G.P. Pisano Profiting from innovation and the intellectual property revolution Research Policy 35 2006 1122 1130
57. D. Revelt, and K. Train Mixed logit with repeated choices: households choice of appliance efficiency level Review of Economics and Statistics 53 4 1998 647 657
58. R.P. Rumelt Towards a strategy theory of the firm B. Lamb, Competitive Strategic Management 1984 Prentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs, NJ 556 570
59. M. Rysman, and T. Simcoe Patents and the performance of voluntary standard-setting organizations Management Science 54 11 2008 1920 1934
60. P. Samuelson, and S. Scotchmer The law and economics of reverse engineering Yale Law Journal 111 7 2002 1575 1663
61. H. Sattler Appropriability of product innovations: an empirical analysis for Germany International Journal of Technology Transfer 25 5-6 2003 502 516
62. A. Shepard Licensing to enhance demand for new technologies RAND Journal of Economics 18 3 1987 360 368
63. N. Siggelkow Misperceiving interactions among complements and substitutes: organizational consequences Management Science 48 7 2002 900 916
64. T. Simcoe, S.J.H. Graham, and M.P. Feldman Competing on standards? Entrepreneurship, intellectual property, and platform technologies Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 18 2 2009 775 816
65. Simcoe, T.; 2010. Standard setting committees, Working paper. Boston University School of Management, Boston, MA.
66. D.G. Sirmon, M.A. Hitt, and R.D. Ireland Managing firm resources in dynamic environments to create value: looking inside the black box Academy of Management Review 32 1 2007 273 292
67. D. Somaya Strategic determinants of decisions not to settle patent litigation Strategic Management Journal 24 1 2003 17 38
68. D.G. Swanson, and W.J. Baumol Reasonable and nondiscriminatory (RAND) royalties, standards selection, and control of market power Antitrust Law Journal 73 1. 2005
69. D.J. Teece Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy Research Policy 15 6 1986 285 304
70. D.J. Teece Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance Strategic Management Journal 28 13 2007 1319 1350
71. E. von Hippel The Sources of Innovation 1988 Oxford University Press New York
72. J. Yu, P. Goos, and M. Vandebroek Efficient conjoint choice designs in the presence of respondent heterogeneity Marketing Science 28 1 2009 122 135
73. B.A. Zelner Using simulation to interpret results from logit, probit, and other nonlinear models Strategic Management Journal 30 12 2009 1335 1348