Interpretation of interaction effects in logit and probit analyses: Reconsidering the relationship between registration laws, education, and voter turnout

American Politics Research

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 80-95

  Huang, Chi ^a   Shields, Todd G ^b,c  

^a NATIONAL CHUNG CHENG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS   (United States)

^c Fulbright Inst of Intl Relations   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0002347660     PISSN: 1532673X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1532673X00028001005     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Aldrich, J. H., & Nelson, F. D. (1984). Linear probability, logit, and probit models (Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, Series No. 07-045). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
2. Amemiya, T. (1981). Qualitative response models: A survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 19(4), 1483-1536.
3. Ben-Akiva, M., & Lerman, S. R. (1985). Discrete choice analysis: Theory and application to travel demand. Cambridge: MIT Press.
4. Beyer, W. H. (1991). CRC standard probability and statistics: Tables and formulae. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
5. Bliss, C. I. (1934). The method of probits. Science, 79(2037), 38-39.
6. Brians, C., & Grofman, B. (1994, September). Voter registration laws and turnout in the U.S. states: A longitudinal analysis. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, New York.
7. Cox, D. R., & Snell, E. J. (1989). Analysis of binary data (2nd ed.). London: Chapman and Hall.
8. Finney, D. J. (1971). Probit analysis (3rd ed.). London: Cambridge University Press.
9. Fox, J. (1987). Effect displays for generalized linear models. In C. C. Clogg (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 347-361). Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.
10. Hanushek, E. A., & Jackson, J. E. (1977). Statistical methods for social scientists. New York: Academic Press.
11. Highton, B. (1997). Easy registration and voter turnout. Journal of Politics, 59(2), 565-576.
12. King, G. (1989). Unifying political methodology: The likelihood theory of statistical inference. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
13. Lee, M. (1996). Methods of moments and semiparametric econometrics for limited dependent variables. New York: Springer.
14. Maddala, G. S. (1983). Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
15. Nagler, J. (1991). The effect of registration laws and education on U.S. voter turnout. American Political Science Review, 85(4), 1393-1405.
16. Nagler, J. (1994). Scobit: An alternative estimator to logit and probit. American Journal of Political Science, 38(1), 230-255.
17. Powell, J. L., Stock, J. H., & Stoker, T. M. (1989). Semiparametric estimation of index coefficients. Econometrica, 57(6), 1403-1430.
18. Stoker, T. M. (1986). Consistent estimation of scaled coefficients. Econometrica, 54(6), 1461-1481.
19. Train, K. (1986). Qualitative choice analysis: Theory, econometrics, and an application to auto-mobile demand. Cambridge: MIT Press.
20. Wolfinger, R. E., & Rosenstone, S. J. (1980). Who votes? New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.