Adaptive divergence at the margin of an invaded range

Evolution

Volumn 67, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 722-731

  Kilkenny, Francis F ^a,b   Galloway, Laura F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

^b PACIFIC NORTHWEST RESEARCH STATION   (United States)

Author keywords

Common garden; Countergradient selection; Genetic drift; Invasive species; Local adaptation; Plasticity; Range expansion; Range limits

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL INVASION; BIOMASS; COLONIZATION; DICOTYLEDON; DIVERGENCE; ENVIRONMENTAL RISK; FITNESS; GARDEN; GENETIC DRIFT; GROWTH RATE; INVASIVE SPECIES; LOCAL ADAPTATION; NATURAL SELECTION; RANGE EXPANSION; SURVIVAL;

ADAPTATION; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EVOLUTION; GENETICS; INTRODUCED SPECIES; LONICERA; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ADAPTATION, BIOLOGICAL; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; INTRODUCED SPECIES; LINEAR MODELS; LONICERA; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS;

NORTH AMERICA;

LONICERA JAPONICA;

EID: 84874752953     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01829.x     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Alexander, J. M., and P. J. Edwards 2010. Limits to the niche and range margins of alien species. Oikos 119:1377-1386.
2. Alexander, J. M., P. J. Edwards, M. Poll, C. G. Parks, and H. Dietz 2009. Establishment of parallel altitudinal clines in traits of native and introduced forbs. Ecology 90:612-622.
3. Anderson, J. T., and M. A. Geber 2010. Demographic source-sink dynamics restrict local adaptation in Elliott's blueberry (Vaccinium elliottii). Evolution 64:370-384.
4. Applied Biosystems. 2005. AFLP plant mapping protocol. Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA
5. Baker, H. G. 1955. Self-compatibility and establishment after long distance dispersal. Evolution 9:347-349.
6. Barrett, S. C. H., and B. C. Husband 1990. Genetics of plant migration and colonization. In: Brown, A. H. D., M. T. Clegg, A. L. Kahler, and B. S. Weir, eds. Plant population genetics, breeding and genetic resources. Sinauer Associates, pp 254-277.
7. Beans, C. M., F. F. Kilkenny, and L. F. Galloway 2012. Climate suitability and human influences combined explain the range expansion of an invasive horticultural plant. Biol. Invas. 14:2067-2078.
8. Blossey, B., and R. Nötzold 1995. Evolution of increased competitive ability in invasive nonindigenous plants: a hypothesis. J. Ecol. 83:887-889.
9. Bossdorf, O., H. Auge, L. Lafuma, W. E. Rogers, E. Siemann, and D. Prati 2005. Phenotypic and genetic differentiation between native and introduced plants populations. Oecologia 144:1-11.
10. Burton, O. J., B. L. Philips and J. M. J. Travis 2010. Trade-offs and the evolution of life-histories during range expansion. Ecol. Lett. 13:1210-1220.
11. Colautti, R. I., J. L. Maron, and S. C. H. Barrett 2009. Common garden comparisons of native and introduced plant populations: latitudinal clines can obscure evolutionary inferences. Evol. Appl. 2:187-199.
12. Coulatti, R. I., C. G. Eckert, and S. C. H. Barrett 2010. Evolutionary constraints on adaptive evolution during range expansion in an invasive plant. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 277:1799-1806.
13. Conover, D. O., and E. T. Schultz 1995. Phenotypic similarity and the evolutionary significance of countergradient variation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 10:248-252.
14. Darling, E., K. E. Samis, and C. G. Eckert 2008. Increased seed dispersal potential towards geographic range limits in a Pacific coast dune plant. New Phytol. 178:424-435.
15. Dietz, H., and P. J. Edwards 2006. Recognition that causal processes change during plant invasion helps explain conflicts in evidence. Ecology 87:1359-1367.
16. Enquist, B. J., and K. J. Niklas 2001. Invariant scaling relations across tree-dominated communities. Nature 410:655-741.
17. Etterson, J. R. 2004. Evolutionary potential of Chamaecrista fasciculata in relation to climate change. 1. Clinal patterns of selection along an environmental gradient in the Great Plains. Evolution 58:1446-1458.
18. Evanno, G., S. Regnaut, and J. Goudet 2005. Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Mol. Ecol. 14:2611-2620.
19. Geber, M. A. 2008. To the edge: studies of species' range limits. New Phytol. 178:228-230.
20. Gurevitch, J., G. A. Fox G. M. Wardle, Inderjit, and D. Taub 2011. Emergent insights from the synthesis of conceptual frameworks for biological invasions. Ecol. Lett. 14:407-418.
21. Holt, R. D. 1996. Demographic constraints in evolution: towards unifying the evolutionary theories of senescence and niche conservatism. Evol. Ecol. 10:1-11.
22. Kawecki, T. J., and D. Ebert 2004. Conceptual issues in local adaptation. Ecol. Lett. 7:1225-1241.
23. Keller, S. R., and D. R. Taylor 2008. History, chance and adaptation during biological invasion: separating stochastic phenotypic evolution from response to selection. Ecol. Lett. 11:852-866.
24. Keller, S. R., D. R. Sowell, M. Neiman, L. M. Wolfe, and D. R. Taylor 2009. Adaptation and colonization history affect the evolution of clines in two introduced species. New Phytol. 183:678-690.
25. Kilkenny, F.F. 2011. Gene flow and adaptation in Lonicera japonica. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA
26. Kooyers, N. J. and K. M. Olsen 2012. Rapid evolution of an adaptive cyanogenesis cline in introduced North American white clover (Trifolium repens L.). Mol. Ecol. 21:2455-2468.
27. Lankau, R. A., V. Nuzzo, G. Spyreas, and A. S. Davis 2009. Evolutionary limits ameliorate the negative impact of an invasive plant. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106:15362-15367.
28. Larson, K. C. 2000. Circumnutation behavior of an exotic honeysuckle vine and its native congener: influence on clonal mobility. Am. J. Bot. 87:533-538.
29. Laugen, A. T., A. Laurila, K. Räsänen, and J. Merilä 2003. Latitudinal countergradient variation in the common frog (Rana temporaria) development rates-evidence for local adaptation. J. Evol. Biol. 16:999-1005.
30. Leatherman, A. D. 1955. Ecological life-history of Lonicera japonica Thunb. Ph. D. dissertation, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN
31. Leger, E. A., and K. J. Rice 2007. Assessing the speed and predictability of local adaptation in invasive California poppies (Eschscholzia californica). J. Evol. Biol. 20:1090-1103.
32. Lodge, D. M. 1993. Species invasions and deletions: community effects and responses to climate and habitat change. In: Karieva, P. M., J. G. Kingsolver, and R. B. Huey, eds. Biotic Interactions and Global Change. Sinauer Associates, pp 367-387.
33. Maron, J. L., M. Vilà, R. Bommarco, S. Elmendorf, and P. Beardsley 2004. Rapid evolution of an invasive plant. Ecol. Monogr. 74:261-280.
34. Monty, A., and G. Mahy 2009. Clinal differentiation during invasion: Senecio inaequidens (Asteraceae) along altitudinal gradients in Europe. Oecologia 159:305-315.
35. Monty, A., and G. Mahy 2010. Evolution of dispersal traits along an invasion route in the wind-dispersed Senecio inaequidens (Asteraceae). Oikos 119:1563-1570.
36. Oliveri, I. 2009. Alternative mechanisms of range expansion are associated with different changes of evolutionary potential. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24:289-292.
37. Nuzzo, V. 1997. Element stewardship abstract for Lonicera japonica. The Nature Conservancy, Arlington, VA 22 p.
38. Parker, I. M., J. Rodriguez, and M. Loik 2003. An evolutionary approach to understanding the biology of invasions: local adaptation and general purpose genotypes in the weed Verbascum thapsus. Conserv. Biol. 17:59-72.
39. Phillips, B. L. 2009. The evolution of growth rates on an expanding range edge. Biol. Lett. 5:802-804.
40. Phillips, B. L., G. P. Brown, J. K. Webb, and R. Shine 2006. Invasion and the evolution of speed in toads. Nature 439:803.
41. Phillips, B. L., G. P. Brown, and R. Shine 2010. Life-history evolution in range-shifting populations. Ecology 91:1617-1627.
42. Prentis, P. J., J. R. U. Wilson, E. E. Dormontt, D. M. Ricardson, and A. J. Lowe 2008. Adaptive evolution in invasive species. Trends in Plant Sci. 13:288-294.
43. Pritchard, J. K., M. Stephens, and P. Donnelly 2000. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945-959.
44. Sakai, A. K., F. W. Allendorf, J. S. Holt, D. M. Lodge, J. Molofsky, K. A. With, S. Baughman, R. J. Cabin, J. E. Cohen, N. C. Ellstrand et al. 2001. The population biology of invasive species. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 32:305-332.
45. SAS Institute. 2009. SAS/STAT Version 9.0. SAS Institute, Cary, NC
46. Schierenbeck, K. A. 2004. Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica) as an invasive species: history, ecology, and context. Cr. Rev. Plant Sci. 23:391-400.
47. Schierenbeck, K. A., J. L. Hamrick, and R. N. Mack 1995. Comparison of allozyme variability in a native and an introduced species of Lonicera. Heredity 75:1-9.
48. Sexton, J. P., P. J. McIntyre, A. L. Angert, and K. J. Rice 2009. Evolution and ecology of species range limits. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 40:415-436.
49. Siemann, E. and W. E. Rogers 2001. Genetic differences in growth of an invasive tree species. Ecol. Lett. 4:514-518.
50. Simmons, A. D., and C. D. Thomas 2004. Changes in dispersal during species' range expansions. Am. Nat. 164:378-395.
51. Skulman, B. W., J. D. Mattice, M. D. Cain, and E. E. Gbur 2004. Evidence for allelopathic interference of Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica) to loblolly and shortleaf pine regeneration. Weed Sci. 52:433-439.
52. Theoharides, K. A., and J. S. Dukes 2007. Plant invasion across space and time: factors affecting nonindigenous species success during four stages of invasion. New Phytol. 176:256-273.
53. Vos, P., R. Hogers, M. Bleeker, M. Reijans, T. van de Lee, M. Hornes, A. Frijters, J. Pot, J. Peleman, M. Kuiper and M. Zabeau 1995. AFLP-a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Res. 23:4407-4414.