Biomass conversion inhibitors furfural and 5-hydroxymethylfurfural induce formation of messenger RNP granules and attenuate translation activity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Applied and Environmental Microbiology

Volumn 79, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 1661-1667

  Iwaki, Aya ^a   Kawai, Takao ^a   Yamamoto, Yosuke ^a   Izawa, Shingo ^a  

^a KYOTO INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

5 HYDROXYMETHYL FURFURALS; BIOMASS CONVERSION INHIBITOR; EUKARYOTIC CELLS; LIGNOCELLULOSIC BIOMASS; LIGNOCELLULOSIC HYDROLYSATES; PHYSIOLOGICAL EFFECTS; PHYSIOLOGICAL STATUS; TRANSLATION ACTIVITY; WARNING SIGNS; YEAST CELL; YEAST GROWTH;

ALDEHYDES; BIOCONVERSION; FERMENTATION; FURFURAL; GRANULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; YEAST;

INFORMATION GRANULES;

5 HYDROXYMETHYLFURFURAL; 5-HYDROXYMETHYLFURFURAL; DRUG DERIVATIVE; FURFURAL; RIBONUCLEOPROTEIN;

BIOMASS; ENZYME ACTIVITY; FERMENTATION; GROWTH RATE; LIGNIN; PHYSIOLOGY; RNA; YEAST;

ARTICLE; BIOMASS; CELL GRANULE; DRUG EFFECT; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; METABOLISM; PROTEIN SYNTHESIS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

BIOMASS; CYTOPLASMIC GRANULES; FURALDEHYDE; PROTEIN BIOSYNTHESIS; RIBONUCLEOPROTEINS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 84874729026     PISSN: 00992240     EISSN: 10985336     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.02797-12     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Lu X, Yamauchi K, Phaiiboonsilpa N, Saka S. 2009. Two-step hydrolysis of Japanese beech as treated by semi-flow hot-compressed water. J. Wood Sci. 55:367-375.
2. Margeot A, Hahn-Hagerdal B, Edlund M, Slade R, Monot F. 2009. New improvements for lignocellulosic ethanol. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 20: 372-380.
3. Klinke HB, Thomsen AB, Ahring BK. 2004. Inhibition of ethanol producing yeast and bacteria by degradation product produced during pretreatment of biomass. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 66:10-26.
4. Antal MJ, Mok WS, Richards GN. 1990. Mechanism of formation of 5-(hydroxymethyl)-2-furaldehyde from D-fructose and sucrose. Carbohydr. Res. 199:91-109.
5. Antal MJ, Leesomboon T, Mok WS, Richards GN. 1991. Mechanism of formation of 2-furaldehyde from D-xylose. Carbohydr. Res. 217:71-85.
6. Almeida JRM, Modig T, Petersson A, Hähn-Hägerdal B, Lidén G, Gorwa-Grauslund MF. 2007. Increased tolerance and conversion of inhibitors in lignocellulosic hydrolysates by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 82:340-349.
7. Sanchez B, Bautista J. 1988. Effects of furfural and 5-hydroxymethylfurfrual on the fermentation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and biomass production from Candida guilliermondii. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 10:315-318.
8. Taherzadeh MJ, Gustafsson L, Niklasson C, Lidén G. 2000. Physiological effects of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural on Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 53:701-708.
9. Liu ZL, Slininger PJ, Dien BS, Berhow MA, Kurtzman CP, Gorsich SW. 2004. Adaptive response of yeasts to furfural and 5-hydroxymethylfurfural and new chemical evidence for HMF conversion to 2,5-bis-hydroxymethylfuran. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 31:345-352.
10. Sárvári Horváth I, Franzén CJ, Taherzadeh MJ, Niklasson C, Lidén G. 2003. Effects of furfural on the respiratory metabolism of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in glucose-limited chemostats. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69: 4076-4086.
11. Gorsich SW, Dien BS, Nichols NN, Slininger PJ, Liu ZL, Skory CD. 2006. Tolerance to furfural-induced stress is associated with pentose phosphate pathway genes ZWF1, GND1, RPE1, and TKL1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 71:339-349.
12. Modig T, Liden G, Taherzadeh MJ. 2002. Inhibition effects of furfural on alcohol dehydrogenase, aldehyde dehydrogenase and pyruvate dehydrogenase. Biochem. J. 363:769-776.
13. Allen SA, Clark W, McCaffery JM, Cai Z, Lanctot A, Slininger PJ, Liu ZL, Gorsich SW. 2010. Furfural induces reactive oxygen species accumulation and cellular damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol. Biofuels 3:2. doi:10.1186/1754-6834-3-2.
14. Lin FM, Qiao B, Yuan YJ. 2009. Comparative proteomic analysis of tolerance and adaptation of ethanologenic Saccharomyces cerevisiae to furfural, a lignocellulosic inhibitory compound. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75:3765-3776.
15. Ma M, Liu ZL. 2010. Comparative transcriptome profiling analyses during the lag phase uncover YAP1, PDR1, PDR3, RPN4, and HSF1 as key regulatory genes in genomic adaptation to the lignocellulose derived inhibitor HMF for Saccharomyces cerevisiae. BMC Genomics 11:660. doi:10.1186/1471-2164-11-660.
16. Balagopal V, Parker R. 2009. Polysomes, P bodies and stress granules: states and fates of eukaryotic mRNAs. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 21:403-408.
17. Buchan JR, Parker R. 2009. Eukaryotic stress granules:the ins and outs of translation. Mol. Cell 36:932-940.
18. Sheth U, Parker R. 2003. Decapping and decay of messenger RNA occur in cytoplasmic processing bodies. Science 300:805-808.
19. Reijns MAM, Alexander RD, Spiller MP, Beggs JD. 2008. A role for Q/N-rich aggregation-prone regions in P-body localization. J. Cell Sci. 121:2463-2472.
20. Parker R, Sheth U. 2007. P bodies and the control of mRNA translation and degradation. Mol. Cell 25:635-646.
21. Franks TM, Lykke-Andersen J. 2008. The control of mRNA decapping and P-body formation. Mol. Cell 32:605-615.
22. Buchan JR, Muhlrad D, Parker R. 2008. P bodies promote stress granule assembly in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Cell Biol. 183:441-455.
23. Grousl T, Ivanov P, Frydlova I, Vasicová P, Janda F, Vojtová J, Malínská K, Malcová I, Nováková L, Janosková D, Valásek L, Hasek J. 2009. Robust heat shock induces eIF2α-phosphorylationindependent assembly of stress granules containing eIF3 and 40S ribosomal subunits in budding yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Cell Sci. 122:2078-2088.
24. Kato K, Yamamoto Y, Izawa S. 2011. Severe ethanol stress induces assembly of stress granules in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 28:339-347.
25. Buchan JR, Yoon JH, Parker R. 2011. Stress-specific composition, assembly and kinetics of stress granules in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Cell Sci. 124:228-239.
26. 2+ induce multiple P-bodies. Mol. Biol. Cell 21:2624-2638.
27. Iwaki A, Izawa S. 2012. Acidic stress induces the formation of P-bodies, but not stress granules, with mild attenuation of bulk translation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochem. J. 446:225-233.
28. Coller J, Parker R. 2005. General translational repression by activators of mRNA decapping. Cell 122:875-886.
29. Teixeira D, Sheth U, Valencia-Sanchez MA, Brengues M, Parker R. 2005. Processing bodies require RNA for assembly and contain nontranslating mRNAs. RNA 11:371-382.
30. Kedersha N, Anderson P. 2002. Stress granules: sites of mRNA triage that regulatemRNAstability and translatability. Biochem. Soc. Transact. 30(Pt 6):963-969.
31. Izawa S, Kita T, Ikeda K, Miki T, Inoue Y. 2007. Formation of the cytoplasmic P-bodies in sake yeast during Japanese sake brewing and wine making. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 71:2800-2807.
32. Izawa S, Ikeda K, Miki T, Wakai Y, Inoue Y. 2010. Vacuolar morphology of Saccharomyces cerevisiae during the process of wine making and Japanese sake brewing. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 88:277-282.
33. Kahana JA, Schlenstedt G, Evanchuk DM, Geiser JR, Hoyt MA, Silver PA. 1998. The yeast dynactin complex is involved in partitioning the mitotic spindle between mother and daughter cells during anaphase B. Mol. Biol. Cell 9:1741-1756.
34. Miyakawa Y, Nishi Y, Kato K, Sato H, Takahashi M, Hayashi Y. 1991. Initiating activity of eight pyrolysates of carbohydrates in a twostage mouse skin tumorigenesis model. Carcinogenesis 12:1169-1173.
35. Inada T, Aiba H. 2005. Translation of aberrant mRNAs lacking a termination codon or with a shortened 3'-UTR is repressed after initiation in yeast. EMBO J. 24:1584-1595.
36. Shah KH, Zhang B, Ramachandran V, Herman. PK. 2013. Processing body and stress granule assembly occur by independent and differentially regulated pathways in S. cerevisiae. Genetics 193:109-127.
37. Izawa S. 2011. Yeast mRNA flux and organelle morphology in the response to ethanol stress, p 41-49. In Kitamoto K (ed), The new technology and functionality of fermentation foods II. CMC Press, Tokyo, Japan.
38. Brengues M, Sheth U, Parker R. 2005. Movement of eukaryotic mRNAs between polysomes and cytoplasmic processing bodies. Science 310:486- 489.
39. Petersson A, Almeida JRM, Modig T, Karhumaa K, Hähn-Hägerdal B, Gorwa-Grauslund MF, Lidén G. 2006. A 5-hydroxymethy furfural reducing enzyme encoded by the Saccharomyces cerevisiae ADH6 gene conveys HMF tolerance. Yeast 23:455-464.
40. Modig T, Almeida JRM, Gorwa-Grauslund MF, Liden G. 2008. Variability of the response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains to lignocellulose hydrolysate. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 100:423-429.