Comparative estimation of percentage breast tissue density for digital mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis, and magnetic resonance imaging

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment

Volumn 138, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 311-317

  Tagliafico, Alberto ^a   Tagliafico, Giulio ^a   Astengo, Davide ^a   Airaldi, Sonia ^a   Calabrese, Massimo ^b   Houssami, Nehmat ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GENOA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GENOA   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Breast density; Digital breast tomosynthesis; Magnetic resonance imaging; Mammography

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST DENSITY; BREAST EXAMINATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIGITAL BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE DISPLAY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHYSICAL PARAMETERS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY;

EID: 84874660425     PISSN: 01676806     EISSN: 15737217     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10549-013-2419-z     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. McCormack VA, Dos SSI (2006) Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 15:1159-1169
2. Houssami N, Kerlikowske K (2012) The impact of breast density on breast cancer risk and breast screening. Curr Breast Cancer Rep. doi: 10.1007/s12609-012-0070-z
3. Khazen M, Warren RM, Boggis CR, Bryant EC, Reed S, Warsi I, Pointon LJ, Kwan-Lim GE, Thompson D, Eeles R, Easton D, Evans DG, Leach MO, Collaborators in the United Kingdom Medical Research Council Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Breast Screening (MARIBS) Study (2008) A pilot study of compositional analysis of the breast and estimation of breast mammographic density using three-dimensional T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 17:2268-2274
4. Byng JW, Yaffe MJ, Jong RA et al (1998) Analysis of mammographic density and breast cancer risk from digitized mammograms. Radiographics 18:1587-1598
5. Tagliafico A, Calabrese M, Tagliafico G, Resmini E, Martinoli C, Rebora A, Colao A, Pivonello R, Ferone D (2011) Increased mammographic breast density in acromegaly: quantitative and qualitative assessment. Eur J Endocrinol 164:335-340
6. Tagliafico A, Tagliafico G, Tosto S, Chiesa F, Martinoli C, Derchi LE, Calabrese M (2009) Mammographic density estimation: comparison among BI-RADS categories, a semi-automated software and a fully automated one. Breast 18:35-40
7. Tagliafico A, Tagliafico G, Astengo D, Cavagnetto F, Rosasco R, Rescinito G, Monetti F, Calabrese M (2012) Mammographic density estimation: one-to-one comparison of digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis using fully automated software. Eur Radiol 22:1265-1270
8. Poon CS, Bronskill MJ, Henkelman RM, Boyd NF (1992) Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging parameters and their relationship to mammographic pattern. J Natl Cancer Inst 84:777-781
9. Graham SJ, Bronskill MJ, Byng JW, Yaffe MJ, Boyd NF (1996) Quantitative correlation of breast tissue parameters using magnetic resonance and X-ray mammography. Br J Cancer 73:162-168
10. Lee NA, Rusinek H, Weinreb J et al (1997) Fatty and fibroglandular tissue volumes in the breasts of women 20-83 years old: comparison of X-ray mammography and computer-assisted MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 168:501-506
11. Klifa C, Carballido-Gamio J, Wilmes L et al (2004) Quantification of breast tissue index from MR data using fuzzy clustering. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 3:1667-1670
12. Wei J, Chan HP, Helvie MA et al (2004) Correlation between mammographic density and volumetric fibroglandular tissue estimated on breast MR images. Med Phys 31:933-942
13. Reeder SB, McKenzie CA, Pineda AR, Yu H, Shimakawa A, Brau AC, Hargreaves BA, Gold GE, Brittain JH (2007) Water-fat separation with IDEAL gradient-echo imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 25:644-652
14. Clendenen TV, Kim S, Moy L, Wan L, Rusinek H, Stanczyk FZ, Pike MC, Zeleniuch-Jacquotte A (2013) Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of hormone-induced breast changes in young premenopausal women. Magn Reson Imaging 31(1):1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2012.06.022
15. Sardanelli F, Boetes C, Borisch B et al (2010) Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: recommendations from the EUSOMA working group. Eur J Cancer 46:1296-1316
16. Jones J, Hunter D (1995) Consensus methods for medical and health services research. BMJ 311:376-380
17. Landis JR, Kock GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159-174
18. Bland JM, Altman DG (1997) Statistics notes: cronbach's alpha. BMJ 314:572
19. Harvey JA, Bovbjerg VE (2004) Quantitative assessment of mammographic breast density: relationship with breast cancer risk. Radiology 230:29-41
20. Boyd NF, Guo H, Martin LJ et al (2007) Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 356:227-232
21. Varghese JS, Thompson DJ, Michailidou K, Lindstrm S, Turnbull C, Brown J, Leyland J, Warren RM, Luben RN, Loos RJ, Wareham NJ, Rommens J, Paterson AD, Martin LJ, Vachon CM, Scott CG, Atkinson EJ, Couch FJ, Apicella C, Southey MC, Stone J, Li J, Eriksson L, Czene K, Boyd NF, Hall P, Hopper JL, Tamimi RM, MODE Consortium, Rahman N, Easton DF (2012) Mammographic breast density and breast cancer: evidence of a shared genetic basis. Cancer Res 72:1478-1484
22. Thompson DJ, Leach MO, Kwan-Lim G, Gayther SA, Ramus SJ, Warsi I, Lennard F, Khazen M, Bryant E, Reed S, Boggis CR, Evans DG, Eeles RA, Easton DF, Warren RM (2009) Assessing the usefulness of a novel MRI-based breast density estimation algorithm in a cohort of women at high genetic risk of breast cancer: the UK MARIBS study. Breast Cancer Res 11(6):R80
23. Jordan CD, Daniel BL, Koch KM, Yu H, Conolly S, Hargreaves BA (2012) Subject-specific models of susceptibility-induced B(0) field variations in breast MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging. doi: 10.1002/jmri.23762