Subject-specific models of susceptibility-induced B0 field variations in breast MRI

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 37, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 227-232

  Jordan, Caroline D ^a,b   Daniel, Bruce L ^a   Koch, Kevin M ^c   Yu, Huanzhou ^c   Conolly, Steve ^d   Hargreaves, Brian A ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Stanford University   (United States)

^c GE HEALTHCARE   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

B0 field homogeneity; breast imaging; field map estimation; susceptibility variations

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; BREAST; CALCULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HISTOGRAM; HUMAN; IN VIVO STUDY; MAGNETISM; NORMAL HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGY PHANTOM; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

AIR; ALGORITHMS; BREAST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAGNETICS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 84872841571     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: 15222586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.23762     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Morris EA,. Diagnostic breast MR imaging: current status and future directions. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2010; 18: 57-74.
2. Kuhl CK, Braun M,. [Magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative staging for breast cancer: pros and contras]. Radiologe 2008; 48: 358-366.
3. Lehman CD, Schnall MD,. Imaging in breast cancer: magnetic resonance imaging. Breast Cancer Res 2005; 7: 215-219.
4. Schenck JF,. The role of magnetic susceptibility in magnetic resonance imaging: MRI magnetic compatibility of the first and second kinds. Med Phys 1996; 23: 815-850.
5. Carr HY,. Steady-state free precession in nuclear magnetic resonance. Phys Rev Lett 1958; 1: 429-430.
6. Jezzard P, Balaban RS,. Correction for geometric distortion in echo planar images from B0 field variations. Magn Reson Med 1995; 34: 65-73.
7. Meyer CH, Hu BS, Nishimura DG, Macovski A,. Fast spiral coronary artery imaging. Magn Reson Med 1992; 28: 202-213.
8. Huang H, Ceritoglu C, Li X, et al. Correction of B0 susceptibility induced distortion in diffusion-weighted images using large-deformation diffeomorphic metric mapping. Magn Reson Imaging 2008; 26: 1294-1302.
9. Peters NH, Bartels LW, Sprinkhuizen SM, Vincken KL, Bakker CJ,. Do respiration and cardiac motion induce magnetic field fluctuations in the breast and are there implications for MR thermometry? J Magn Reson Imaging 2009; 29: 731-735.
10. Bolan PJ, Henry PG, Baker EH, Meisamy S, Garwood M,. Measurement and correction of respiration-induced B0 variations in breast 1H MRS at 4 Tesla. Magn Reson Med 2004; 52: 1239-1245.
11. van Gelderen P, de Zwart JA, Starewicz P, Hinks RS, Duyn JH,. Real-time shimming to compensate for respiration-induced B0 fluctuations. Magn Reson Med 2007; 57: 362-368.
12. Van de Moortele PF, Pfeuffer J, Glover GH, Ugurbil K, Hu X,. Respiration-induced B0 fluctuations and their spatial distribution in the human brain at 7 Tesla. Magn Reson Med 2002; 47: 888-895.
13. Koch KM, Papademetris X, Rothman DL, de Graaf RA,. Rapid calculations of susceptibility-induced magnetostatic field perturbations for in vivo magnetic resonance. Phys Med Biol 2006; 51: 6381-6402.
14. Li S, Dardzinski BJ, Collins CM, Yang QX, Smith MB,. Three-dimensional mapping of the static magnetic field inside the human head. Magn Reson Med 1996; 36: 705-714.
15. Sutton BP, Noll DC, Fessler JA,. Dynamic field map estimation using a spiral-in/spiral-out acquisition. Magn Reson Med 2004; 51: 1194-1204.
16. Reeder SB, Wen Z, Yu H, et al. Multicoil Dixon chemical species separation with an iterative least-squares estimation method. Magn Reson Med 2004; 51: 35-45.
17. Salomir R, De Senneville BD, Moonen CTW,. A fast calculation method for magnetic field inhomogeneity due to an arbitrary distribution of bulk susceptibility. Concept Magn Reson B 2003; 19B: 26-34.
18. Marques J, Bowtell R,. Application of a Fourier-based method for rapid calculation of field inhomogeneity due to spatial variation of magnetic susceptibility. Concept Magn Reson B 2005; 25B: 65-78.
19. Maril N, Collins CM, Greenman RL, Lenkinski RE,. Strategies for shimming the breast. Magn Reson Med 2005; 54: 1139-1145.
20. Ward HA, Riederer SJ, Jack CR Jr,. Real-time autoshimming for echo planar timecourse imaging. Magn Reson Med 2002; 48: 771-780.
21. Madhuranthakam AJ, Smith MP, Yu H, et al. Water-silicone separated volumetric MR acquisition for rapid assessment of breast implants. J Magn Reson Imaging 2012.
22. Koch KM, Hinks R, King K., Empirical and computed B0 perturbations induced by metallic implants. Proceedings of the 16th Annual Meeting of ISMRM; Toronto. 2008. p. 1180.