Testifying in court: Evidenced-based recommendations for expert-witness testimony

Learning Forensic Assessment

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 565-588

  Kwartner, Phylissa P ^a   Boccaccini, Marcus T ^a  

^a SAM HOUSTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84874579351     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203939888     Document Type: Chapter

References (131)

1. American Psychological Association. (2002). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist, 57, 1060-1073.
2. Barsky, A.E., & Gould, J.W. (2002). Clinicians in court: A guide to subpoenas, depositions, testifying, and everything else you need to know. New York: Guilford.
3. Blau, T.H. (1998). The psychologist as expert witness (2nd ed.) New York: Wiley.
4. Boccaccini, M.T. & Brodsky, S.L. (2002). Believability of expert and lay witnesses: Implications for trial consultation. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 33, 384-388.
5. Bornstein, B.H. (2004). The impact of different types of expert scientific testimony on mock jurors' liability verdicts. Psychology, Crime, and Law, 10, 429-446.
6. Borum, R., & Grisso, T. (1996). Establishing standards for criminal forensic reports: An empirical analysis. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law, 24, 297-317.
7. Brekke, N., & Bordiga, E. (1988). Expert psychological testimony in rape trials: A social cognitive analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 372-386.
8. Brekke, N.J., Enko, P.J., Clavet, G., & Seelau, E. (1991). Of juries and court-appointed experts. Law and Human Behavior, 15, 451-475.
9. Brodsky, S.L. (1991) Testifying in court: Guidelines and maxims for the expert witnesses. Washington D.C.: APA.
10. Brodsky, S.L. (1999). Expert witness: More maxims and guidelines for testifying in court. Washington D.C.: APA.
11. Brodsky, S.L. (2004). Coping with cross-examination and other pathways to effective testimony. Washington D.C.: APA.
12. Brodsky, S.L., & Anderer, S.J. (1999). Serving as an expert witness: Evaluations, subpoenas, and testimony. In F.W. Kaslow (Ed.), Handbook of couple and family forensics: A source-book for mental health and legal professionals (pp. 475-490). New York: Wiley.
13. Bourgeois, M.J., Horowitz, I.A., & ForsterLee, L. (1993). Effects of technicality and access to trial transcripts on verdicts and information processing in a civil trial. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 220-227.
14. Champagne, A., Shuman, D., & Whitaker, E. (1991). An empirical examination of the use of expert witnesses in American courts. Jurimetrics Journal, 31, 375-392.
15. Chappelle, W., & Rosengren, K. (2001). Maintaining composure and credibility as an expert witness during cross-examination. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 1, 51-67.
16. Cooper, J., Bennett, E.A., & Sukel, H.L. (1996). Complex scientific testimony: How do jurors make decisions? Law and Human Behavior, 20, 379-394.
17. Cooper, J., & Neuhaus, I.M. (2000). The "hired gun" effect: Assessing the effect of pay, frequency of testifying, and credentials on the perception of expert testimony. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 149-171.
18. Dahir, V.B., Richardson, J.T., Ginsburg, G.P., Gatowski, S.I., Dobbin, S.A., & Merlino, M.M. (2005). Judicial application of Daubert to psychological syndrome and profile evidence: A research note. Psyc hology, Public Policy, and Law, 11, 62-82.
19. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, 509 US 579 (1993).
20. Dawes, R.M., Faust, D., & Meehl, P.E. (1989). Clinical versus actuarial judgment. Science, 243, 1668-1674.
21. Diamond, S.S., & Casper, J.D. (1992). Blindfolding the jury to verdict consequences: Damages, experts, and the civil jury. Law and Society Review, 26, 513-563.
22. Dixon, L., & Gill, B. (2002). Changes in standards for admitting expert evidence in federal civil cases since the Daubert decision. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 8, 251-308.
23. Erickson, B., Lind, E.A., Johnson, B.C., & O'Barr, W.M. (1978). Speech style and impression formation in a court setting: The effects of "powerful" and "powerless" speech. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14, 266-279.
24. Faust, D., & Ziskin, J. (1988). The expert witness in psychology and psychiatry. Science, 241, 31-34.
25. ForsterLee ,L., Horowitz ,I.A., & Bourgeois ,M.J. (1993).Juror competence in civil trials: Effects of preinstruction and evidence technicality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 14-21.
26. Frye v. United States, 293 F.1013 (D.C. Cir. 1923).
27. Fulero, S.M., & Finkel, N.J. (1991). Barring ultimate issue testimony: An insane rule? Law and Human Behavior, 15, 495-507.
28. Gabora, N.J., Spanos, N.P., & Joab, A. (1993). The effects of complainant age and expert psychological testimony in a simulated child sexual abuse trial. Law and Human Behavior, 17, 103-119.
29. Gatowski, S.I., Dobbin, S.A., Richardson, J.T., Ginsburg, G.P., Merlino, M.L., & Dahir, V. (2001). Asking the gatekeepers: A national survey of judges on judging expert evidence in a post-Daubert world. Law and Human Behavior, 25, 433-458.
30. Gelinas, L., & Alain, M. (1993). Expertise psycho-juridique: Une evaluation de deux types de rapports et de leur influence sur la perception de jures potentiels. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 25, 175-192.
31. Gibbs, M.S., Sigal, J., Adams, B., & Grossman, B. (1989). Cross-examination of the expert witness: Do hostile tactics affect impressions of a simulated jury? Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 7, 275-281.
32. Greene, E., Downey, C., & Goodman-Delahunty, J. (1999). Juror decisions about damages in employment discrimination cases. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 17, 107-121.
33. Groscup, J.L. (2004). Judicial decision making about expert testimony in the aftermath of Daubert and Kumho. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 4, 57-67.
34. Groscup, J.L., Penrod, S.D., Studebaker, C.A., Huss, M.T., & O'Neil, K.M. (2002). The effects of Daubert on admissibility of expert testimony in state and federal criminal cases. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 8, 339-372.
35. Grove, W.M., & Meehl, P.E. (1996). Comparative efficiency of informal (subjective, impressionistic) and formal (mechanical, algorithmic) prediction procedures: The clinical-statistical controversy. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2, 293-323.
36. Gutheil, T.G. (2000). The presentation of forensic psychiatric evidence in court. Israel Journal of Psychiatry and Related Science, 37, 137-144.
37. Hare, R.D. (2003). The Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised manual (2nd ed.). North Tonawanda, New York: Multi-Health Systems.
38. Heilbrun, K., & Collins, S. (1995). Evaluations of trial competency and mental state at the time of the offense: Report characteristics: Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 26, 61-67.
39. Horowitz, I.A., Bordens, K.S., Victor, E., Bourgeois, M.J., & ForsterLee, L. (2001). The effects of complexity on jurors' verdicts and construction of evidence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 641-652.
40. Horowitz, I.A., ForsterLee, l., Brolly, I. (1996). Effects of trial complexity on decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 757-768.
41. Kovera, M.B., Gresham, A.W., Borgida, E., Gray, E., & Regan, P.C. (1997). Does expert psychological testimony inform or influence juror decision making? A social cognitive analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 178-191.
42. Kovera, M.B., Levy, R.J., Borgida, E., & Penrod, S.D. (1994). Expert testimony in child sexual abuse cases: Effects of expert evidence type and cross-examination. Law and Human Behavior, 18, 653-674.
43. Kovera, M.B., & McAuliff, B.D. (2000). The effects of peer review and evidence quality on judge evaluations of psychological science: Are judges effective gatekeepers? Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 574-586.
44. Krauss, D.A., & Lee, D.H. (2003). Deliberating on dangerousness and death: Jurors' ability to differentiate between expert actuarial and clinical predictions of dangerousness. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 26, 113-137.
45. Krauss, D.A., Leiberman, J.D., & Olson, J. (2004). The effects of rational and experiential information processing of expert testimony in death penalty cases. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 22, 801-822.
46. Krauss, D.A., & Sales, B.D. (2001). The effects of clinical and scientific expert testimony on juror decision making in capital sentencing. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7, 267-310.
47. Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael, 526 U.S. 137 (1999).
48. Kwartner, P.P., Lyons, P.M., & Boccaccini, M.T. (2006). Judges' risk communication preferences in risk for future violence cases. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 5, 185-194.
49. Levine, S.V. (1983). The role of the mental health expert witness in family law disputes. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 28, 255-258.
50. Lubet, S. (1998). Expert testimony: A guide for expert witnesses and the lawyers who examine them. Notre Dame, IN: NITA.
51. Malone, D.M., & Zwier, P.J. (2000). Effective expert testimony. Notre Dame, IN: NITA.
52. Marable, B.E. (1998). Influence of expert testimony and victim resistance on mock jurors' decision and judgments concerning acquaintance rape (doctoral dissertation, Northern Illinois University, 1998). Dissertation Abstracts International, 59, 5096.
53. Nietzel, M.T., & Dillehay, R.C. (1986). Psychological consultation in the courtroom. New York: Pergamon Press.
54. Parry, J.W. (2004). Expert evidence and testimony: Daubert vs. Frye. Mental and Physical Disability Law Reporter, 28, 136-140.
55. Petty, R.E., & Cacioppo, J.T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Pergamon Press.
56. Redding, R.E., Floyd, M.Y., & Hawk, G.L. (2001). What judges and lawyers think about the testimony of mental health experts: A survey of the courts and bar. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 19, 583-594.
57. Rogers, R., Bagby, R.M., & Chow, M.K. (1992). Psychiatrists and the parameters of expert testimony. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 15, 387-396.
58. Rogers, R., Bagby, R.M., Crouch, M., & Cutler, B. (1990). Effects of ultimate opinion on juror perceptions of insanity. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 13, 225-232.
59. Rogers, R., & Ewing, C.P. (2003). The prohibition of ultimate opinions: A misguided enterprise. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 3, 65-75.
60. Rudy, L.A. (1996). Custody and expert opinion as factors in sexual abuse cases (doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University, 1996). Dissertation Abstracts International, 57, 3422.
61. Schnopp-Wyatt, E. N. (1999). Expert testimony in rape trials: Prejudicial or probative? (Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Chicago, 1999). Dissertation Abstracts International, 60, 6425.
62. Shapiro, D.L. (1984). Psychological evaluation and expert testimony: A practical guide to forensic work. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.
63. Shuman, D., Champagne, A., & Whitaker, E. (1996a). Assessing the believability of expert witnesses: Science in the jury box. Jurimetrics Journal, 37, 23-32.
64. Shuman, D., Champagne, A., & Whitaker, E. (1996b). Juror assessments of the believability of expert witnesses: A literature review. Jurimetrics Journal, 36, 371-382.
65. Shuman, D., Whitaker, E., & Champagne, A. (1994). An empirical examination of the use of expert witnesses in the courts-Part II: A three city study. Jurimetrics Journal, 34, 193-208.
66. Stewart, T.L., Whiteside, S.P., & Golding, J.M. (2000). The effectiveness of expert witnesses in civil trials involving repressed memories of sexual assault. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 18, 27-62.
67. Tillbrook, C., Mumley, D., & Grisso, T. (2003). Avoiding expert opinions on the ultimate legal question: The case for integrity. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 3, 77-87.
68. Wilkinson, A.P. (1997). Forensic psychiatry: The making and breaking of expert opinion testimony. The Journal of Psychiatry and Law, 25, 51-112.
69. Bornstein, B.H. (2004). The impact of different types of expert scientific testimony on mock jurors' liability verdicts. Psychology, Crime, and Law, 10, 429-446.
70. Branca, R.L. (2003). The effect of expert witness testimony about rape trauma reactions on juror decision making (doctoral dissertation, University of Kentucky, 2003). Dissertation Abstracts International, 64, 631.
71. Brekke, N., & Bordiga, E. (1988). Expert psychological testimony in rape trials: A social cognitive analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 372-386.
72. Brekke, N.J., Enko, P.J., Clavet, G., & Seelau, E. (1991). Of juries and court-appointed experts. Law and Human Behavior, 15, 451-475.
73. Bourgeois, M.J., Horowitz, I.A., & ForsterLee, L. (1993). Effects of technicality and access to trial transcripts on verdicts and information processing in a civil trial. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 220-227.
74. Burnstein, V.J. (1995). Effects of a defense psychological expert witness in acquaintance rape trials (doctoral dissertation, University of Texas at Austin, 1995). Dissertation Abstracts International, 56, 5830.
75. Claussen-Schulz, A.M. (2002). The danger of asking jurors about danger: An investigation of mock jury sentencing in capital cases (doctoral dissertation, University of Nebraska, 2002). Dissertation Abstracts International, 63, 3513.
76. Cooper, J., Bennett, E.A., & Sukel, H.L. (1996). Complex scientific testimony: How do jurors make decisions? Law and Human Behavior, 20, 379-394.
77. Cooper, J., & Hall, J. (2000). Reaction of mock jurors to testimony of a court appointed expert. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 18, 719-729.
78. Cooper, J., & Neuhaus, I.M. (2000). The "hired gun" effect: Assessing the effect of pay, frequency of testifying, and credentials on the perception of expert testimony. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 149-171.
79. Couch, J.V., & Sigler, J.N. (2002). Gender of an expert witness and the jury verdict. The Psychological Record, 52, 281-287.
80. Crowley, M.J., O'Callaghan, M.G., & Ball, P.J. (1994). The juridical impact of psychological expert testimony in a simulated child sexual abuse trial. Law and Human Behavior, 18, 89-105.
81. Davis, K.M. (2003). The impact of the label psychopath on mock juror sentencing decisions in a capital trial. Unpublished master's thesis, Sam Houston State University, Huntsville, Texas.
82. Devenport, J.L. & Cutler, B.L. (2004). Impact of defense-only and opposing eyewitness experts on juror judgments. Law and Human Behavior, 28, 569-576.
83. Devenport, J.L., Stinson, V., Cutler, B., & Kravitz, D.A. (2002). How effective are the cross-examination and expert testimony safeguards? Jurors' perceptions of the suggestiveness and fairness of biased lineup procedures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 1042-1054.
84. Diamond, S.S., & Casper, J.D. (1992). Blindfolding the jury to verdict consequences: Damages, experts, and the civil jury. Law and Society Review, 26, 513-563.
85. Edens, J.F., Desforges, D.M., Fernandez, K., & Palac, C.A. (2004). Effects of psychopathy and violence risk testimony on mock juror perceptions of dangerousness in a capital murder trial. Psychology, Crime, and Law, 10, 393-412.
86. Feinstein, S.J. (2002). Expert psychological testimony: The influence of gender and language intensity on juror decision making (doctoral dissertation, 2002). Dissertation Abstracts International, 63, 522.
87. ForsterLee, L., Horowitz, I.A., & Bourgeois, M.J. (1993). Juror competence in civil trials: Effects of preinstruction and evidence technicality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 14-21.
88. Fox, S.G., & Walters, H.A. (1986). The impact of general versus specific expert testimony and eyewitness confidence upon mock juror judgment. Law and Human Behavior, 10, 215-228.
89. Fulero, S.M., & Finkel, N.J. (1991). Barring ultimate issue testimony: An insane rule? Law and Human Behavior, 15, 495-507.
90. Gabora, N.J., Spanos, N.P., & Joab, A. (1993). The effects of complainant age and expert psychological testimony in a simulated child sexual abuse trial. Law and Human Behavior, 17, 103-119.
91. Geiselman, R.E., Putman, C., Korte, R., Shahriary, M., Jachimowicz, G., & Irzhevsky, V. (2002). Eyewitness expert testimony and juror decisions. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 20, 21-36.
92. Gelinas, L., & Alain, M. (1993). Expertise psycho-juridique: Une evaluation de deux types de rapports et de leur influence sur la perception de jures potentiels. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 25, 175-192.
93. Greenberg, J., & Wursten, A. (1988). The psychologist and psychiatrist as expert witnesses: Perceived credibility and influence. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 19, 373-378.
94. Greene, E., Downey, C., & Goodman-Delahunty, J. (1999). Juror decisions about damages in employment discrimination cases. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 17, 107-121.
95. Griffith, J.D., Libkuman, T.M., Dodd, J.D., Sharif, Z., & Dickinson, J.J. (2002). The effects of expert testimony on mock jurors decision making and memory. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 20, 69-80.
96. Griffith, J.D., Libkuman, T.M., & Poole, D.A. (1998). Repressed memories: The effects of expert testimony on mock jurors' decision making. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 16, 5-23.
97. Guy, L.S., & Edens, J.F. (2003). Juror decision-making in a mock sexually violent predator trial: Gender differences in the impact of divergent types of expert testimony. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 21, 215-237.
98. Horowitz, I.A., Bordens, K.S., Victor, E., Bourgeois, M.J., & ForsterLee, L. (2001). The effects of complexity on jurors' verdicts and construction of evidence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 641-652.
99. Horowitz, I.A., ForsterLee, l., Brolly, I. (1996). Effects of trial complexity on decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 757-768.
100. Hosch, H.M., Beck, E.L., & McIntyre, P. (1980). Influence of expert testimony regarding eyewitness accuracy on juror decisions. Law and Human Behavior, 4, 287-296.
101. Kovera, M.B., Gresham, A.W., Borgida, E., Gray, E., & Regan, P.C. (1997). Does expert psychological testimony inform or influence juror decision making? A social cognitive analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 178-191.
102. Kovera, M.B., Levy, R.J., Borgida, E., & Penrod, S.D. (1994). Expert testimony in child sexual abuse cases: Effects of expert evidence type and cross-examination. Law and Human Behavior, 18, 653-674.
103. Kovera, M.B., McAuliff, B.D., & Herbert, K.S. (1999). Reasoning about scientific evidence: effects of juror gender and evidence quality on juror decisions in a hostile work environment case. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 362-375.
104. Krauss, D.A., & Lee, D.H. (2003). Deliberating on dangerousness and death: Jurors' ability to differentiate between expert actuarial and clinical predictions of dangerousness. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 26, 113-137.
105. Krauss, D.A., Leiberman, J.D., & Olson, J. (2004). The effects of rational and experiential information processing of expert testimony in death penalty cases. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 22, 801-822.
106. Krauss, D.A., & Sales, B.D. (2001). The effects of clinical and scientific expert testimony on juror decision making in capital sentencing. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7, 267-310.
107. Kwartner, P.P., Lyons, P.M., & Boccaccini, M.T. (in press). Judges' risk communication preferences in risk for future violence cases. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health.
108. Leippe, M.R., Eisenstadt, D., Rauch, S.M., & Seib, H.M. (2004). Timing of eyewitness expert testimony, jurors' need for cognition, and case strength as determinants of trial verdicts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 524-541.
109. Loftus, E.F. (1980). Impact of expert psychological testimony on the unreliability of eyewitness identification. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 9-15.
110. Lorentzen. E. (1994). Effects of expert testimony about eyewitness identifications on the sensitivity of jury decision making (doctoral dissertation, Adelphi University, 1994). Dissertation Abstracts International, 55, 5588.
111. Marable, B.E. (1998). Influence of expert testimony and victim resistance on mock jurors' decision and judgments concerning acquaintance rape (doctoral dissertation, Northern Illinois University, 1998). Dissertation Abstracts International, 59, 5096.
112. McAuliff, B.D. (2000) Juror need for cognition and sensitivity to methodological flaws in expert evidence. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Florida International University, Miami.
113. McKimmie, B.M., Newton, C.J., Terry, D.J., & Schuller, R.A. (2004). Jurors' responses to expert witness testimony: The effects of gender stereotypes. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 7, 131-143.
114. Memon, A., & Shuman, D.W. (1998). Juror perception of experts in civil disputes: The role of race and gender. Law and Psychology Review, 22, 179-197.
115. Miyatake, R.K. (1998). White racial identity attitudes as predictors of preference and credibility of African American, Asian American, and White female and male psychologists (doctoral dissertation, University of Maine, 1998). Dissertation Abstracts International, 59, 6074.
116. Rogers, R., Bagby, R.M., & Chow, M.K. (1992). Psychiatrists and the parameters of expert testimony. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 15, 387-396.
117. Rogers, R., Bagby, R.M., Crouch, M., & Cutler, B. (1990). Effects of ultimate opinion on juror perceptions of insanity. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 13, 225-232.
118. Rudy, L.A. (1996). Custody and expert opinion as factors in sexual abuse cases (doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University, 1996). Dissertation Abstracts International, 57, 3422.
119. Russo-Devosa, Y.M.C.G. (2002). The effect of expert testimony on juror accuracy (doctoral dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University, 2002). Dissertation Abstracts International, 63, 2656.
120. Schnopp-Wyatt, E. N. (1999). Expert testimony in rape trials: Prejudicial or probative? (doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Chicago, 1999). Dissertation Abstracts International, 60, 6425.
121. Schuller, R.A., & Cripps, J. (1998). Expert evidence pertaining to battered women: The impact of gender of expert and timing of testimony. Law and Human Behavior, 22, 17-31.
122. Schuller, R.A., & Hastings, P.A. (1996). Trials of battered women who kill: The impact of alternative forms of expert evidence. Law and Human Behavior, 20, 167-187.
123. Schuller, R.A., McKimmie, B.M., & Janz, T. (2004). The impact of expert testimony in trials of battered women who kill. Psychiatry, Psychology, and Law, 11, 1-12.
124. Schuller, R.A., & Rzepa, S. (2002). Expert testimony pertaining to battered woman syndrome: Its impact on jurors' decisions. Law and Human Behavior, 26, 655-673.
125. Schuller, R.A., Terry, D., & McKimmie, B. (2001). The impact of an expert's gender on jurors' decisions. Law and Psychology Review, 25, 59-79.
126. Schuller, R.A., Wells, E., Rzepa, S., & Klippenstine, M.A. (2004). Rethinking battered woman syndrome evidence: The impact of alternative forms of expert testimony on mock jurors' decisions. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 36, 127-136
127. Stewart, T.L., Whiteside, S.P., & Golding, J.M. (2000). The effectiveness of expert witnesses in civil trials involving repressed memories of sexual assault. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 18, 27-62.
128. Sugarman, D.B., & Boney-McCoy, S. (1997). Impact of expert testimony on the believability of repressed memories. Violence and Victims, 12, 115-126.
129. Swenson, R.A., Nash, D.L., & Roos, D.C. (1984). Source credibility and perceived expertness of testimony in a simulated child-custody case. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 15, 891-898.
130. Terrance, C., & Matheson, K. (2003). Undermining reasonableness: Expert testimony in a case involving a battered woman who kills. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 27, 37-45.
131. Vondergeest, L., Honts, C.R., & Devitt, M.K. (1993). Effects of juror and expert witness gender on jurors' perceptions of an expert witness. Modern Psychological Studies, 1, 1-6.