Development Of A Computer-Adaptive Version Of The Forgotten Joint Score

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 418-422

  Giesinger, Johannes M ^a   Kuster, Markus S ^b   Holzner, Bernhard ^a   Giesinger, Karlmeinrad ^c  

^a INNSBRUCK MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Austria)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^c Kantonsspital St Gallen ^*  (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Computer adaptive testing; Electronic data capture; Forgotten joint score; Patient reported outcomes; Total hip arthroplasty; Total knee arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER; COMPUTER ADAPTIVE TEST; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; FORGOTTEN JOINT SCORE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL INFORMATION; QUESTIONNAIRE; SCORING SYSTEM; SELF REPORT; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALGORITHMS; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HUMANS; JOINT DISEASES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PILOT PROJECTS; SELF REPORT; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84874574404     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: 15328406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.08.026     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Chapman J.R., Norvell D.C., Hermsmeyer J.T., et al. Evaluating common outcomes for measuring treatment success for chronic low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011, 36(21 Suppl):S54.
2. Wright R.W. Knee injury outcomes measures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2009, 17(1):31.
3. Dixon S., Bunker T., Chan D. Outcome scores collected by touchscreen: medical audit as it should be in the 21st century?. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2007, 89(7):689.
4. Theiler R., Bischoff-Ferrari H.A., Good M., et al. Responsiveness of the electronic touch screen WOMAC 3.1 OA Index in a short term clinical trial with rofecoxib. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2004, 12(11):912.
5. Behrend H., Giesinger K., Giesinger J.M., et al. The "Forgotten Joint" as the ultimate goal in joint arthroplasty validation of a new patient-reported outcome measure. J Arthroplasty 2011.
6. Bellamy N., Buchanan W.W., Goldsmith C.H., et al. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 1988, 15(12):1833.
7. Ware J.E., Sherbourne C.D. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992, 30(6):473.
8. Bjorner J., Chang C., Thissen D., et al. Developing tailored instruments: item banking and computerized adaptive assessment. Qual Life Res 2007, 16(Suppl 1):95.
9. Petersen M.A., Groenvold M., Aaronson N.K., et al. Development of computerised adaptive testing (CAT) for the EORTC QLQ-C30 dimensions-general approach and initial results for physical functioning. Eur J Cancer 2010, 46(8):1352.
10. The PROMIS network Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Retrieved 30 Nov 2011, 2010, from. http://www.nihpromis.org.
11. Hambleton R., Swaminathan H., Rogers H. Fundamentals of item response theory 1991, Sage Publications, Newbury Park.
12. Impellizzeri F.M., Mannion A.F., Leunig M., et al. Comparison of the reliability, responsiveness, and construct validity of 4 different questionnaires for evaluating outcomes after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2011, 26(6):861.
13. Jette A.M., Haley S.M., Ni P., et al. Adaptive short forms for outpatient rehabilitation outcome assessment. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2008, 87(10):842.
14. Jette A.M., McDonough C.M., Ni P., et al. A functional difficulty and functional pain instrument for hip and knee osteoarthritis. Arthritis Res Ther 2009, 11(4):R107.
15. Ryser L., Wright B.D., Aeschlimann A., et al. A new look at the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index using Rasch analysis. Arthritis Care Res 1999, 12(5):331.
16. Wolfe F., Kong S.X. Rasch analysis of the Western Ontario MacMaster questionnaire (WOMAC) in 2205 patients with osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, and fibromyalgia. Ann Rheum Dis 1999, 58(9):563.
17. Haley S.M., Gandek B., Siebens H., et al. Computerized adaptive testing for follow-up after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation: II. Participation outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008, 89(2):275.
18. Hart D.L., Mioduski J.E., Stratford P.W. Simulated computerized adaptive tests for measuring functional status were efficient with good discriminant validity in patients with hip, knee, or foot/ankle impairments. J Clin Epidemiol 2005, 58(6):629.
19. Linacre J., Wright B. A user's guide to WINSTEPS 2001, MESA Press, Chicago.
20. Scott N.W., Fayers P.M., Aaronson N.K., et al. Differential item functioning (DIF) analyses of health-related quality of life instruments using logistic regression. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2010, 8:81.
21. Fliege H., Becker J., Walter O.B., et al. Development of a computer-adaptive test for depression (D-CAT). Qual Life Res 2005, 14(10):2277.
22. Linacre J. WINSTEPS (version 3.42) 2003.
23. Choi S. FIRESTAR: computerized adaptive testing (CAT) simulation program for polytomous IRT models 2009.
24. Holzner B., Giesinger J.M., Pinggera J., et al. The computer-based health evaluation system (CHES): a software for electronic patient-reported outcome monitoring. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2012, 12(1):126.
25. Masters G., Wright B. The partial credit model. Handbook of modern item response theory 1997, 101. Springer, New York. W. Van der Linden, R. Hambleton (Eds.).
26. Andrich D. Application of a psychometric rating model to ordered categories which are scored with successive integers. Appl Psychol Meas 1978, 2:581.
27. Browne M., Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociol Methods Res 1992, 21:230.
28. Fries J.F., Krishnan E., Rose M., et al. Improved responsiveness and reduced sample size requirements of PROMIS physical function scales with item response theory. Arthritis Res Ther 2011, 13(5):R147.
29. Bellamy N., Wilson C., Hendrikz J., et al. Electronic data capture (EDC) using cellular technology: implications for clinical trials and practice, and preliminary experience with the m-Womac Index in hip and knee OA patients. Inflammopharmacology 2009, 17(2):93.
30. Hung M., Clegg D.O., Greene T., et al. Evaluation of the PROMIS physical function item bank in orthopaedic patients. J Orthop Res 2011, 29(6):947.