A functional difficulty and functional pain instrument for hip and knee osteoarthritis

Arthritis Research and Therapy

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2009, Pages

  Jette, Alan M ^a   McDonough, Christine M ^a,b   Ni, Pengsheng ^a   Haley, Stephen M ^a   Hambleton, Ronald K ^c   Olarsch, Sippy ^a   Hunter, David J ^d   Kim, Young Jo ^e,f   Felson, David T ^g  

^a BOSTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^b DARTMOUTH INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH POLICY AND CLINICAL PRACTICE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

^d NEW ENGLAND BAPTIST HOSPITAL   (United States)

^e HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^f BOSTON CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^g BOSTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADL DISABILITY; ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL PAIN; FUNCTIONAL STATUS; HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS; HUMAN; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OSTEOARTHRITIS FUNCTION COMPUTER ADAPTIVE TEST; PAIN; QUESTIONNAIRE; RELIABILITY; WALKING DIFFICULTY; WESTERN ONTARIO AND MCMASTER UNIVERSITY OSTEOARTHRITIS INDEX; COMPUTER PROGRAM; HOSPITALIZATION; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PSYCHOMETRY;

FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SOFTWARE;

EID: 68149159228     PISSN: 14786354     EISSN: 14786362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/ar2760     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Bijlsma JW Patient centred outcomes in osteoarthritis Ann Rheum Dis 2005, 64:1-2. 1755170 15608297 10.1136/ard.2004.025072
2. Rat AC Coste J Pouchot J Baumann M Spitz E Retel-Rude N Le Quintrec JS Dumont-Fischer D Guillemin F OAKHQOL: A new instrument to measure quality of life in knee and hip osteoarthritis J Clin Epidemiol 2005, 58:47-55. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.04.011 15649670
3. Tubach F Ravaud P Baron G Falissard B Logeart I Bellamy N Bombardier C Felson D Hochberg M Heijde van der D Dougados M Evaluation of clinically relevant changes in patient reported outcomes in knee and hip osteoarthritis: The minimal clinically important improvement Ann Rheum Dis 2005, 64:29-33. 1755212 15208174 10.1136/ard.2004.022905
4. Garratt AM Brealey S Gillespie WJ DAMASK Trial Team Patient-assessed health instruments for the knee: A structured review Rheumatology (Oxford) 2004, 43:1414-1423. 10.1093/rheumatology/keh362 15316121
5. Long JS Pavalko E Comparing alternative measures of functional limitation Med Care 2004, 42:19-27. 10.1097/01.mlr.0000102293.37107.c5 14713736
6. Jette AM Haley SM Contemporary measurement techniques for rehabilitation outcomes assessment J Rehabil Med 2005, 37:339-345. 10.1080/ 16501970500302793 16287664
7. McHorney C Generic health measurement: Past accomplishments and a measurement paradigm for the 21st century Ann Intern Med 1997, 127:743-750. 9382391
8. Ware JE Jr Conceptualization and measurement of health-related quality of life: Comments on an evolving field Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003, 84:S43-51. 10.1053/apmr.2003.50246 12692771
9. Beaton D Richards R Measuring function of the shoulder J Bone Joint Surg 1996, 78:882-890. 8666606
10. Chen AT Broadhead W Doe E Broyles W Patient acceptance of two health status measures: The Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form General Health Survey and the Duke Health Profile Fam Med 1993, 25:536-539. 8405803
11. McHorney C Bricker DJ A qualitative study of patients' and physicians' views about practice-based functional health assessment Med Care 2002, 40:1113-1125. 10.1097/00005650-200211000-00012 12409856
12. Rubenach S Shadbolt B McCallum J Assessing health-related quality of life following myocardial infarction: Is the SF-12 useful? J Clin Epidemiol 2002, 55:306-309. 10.1016/S0895-4356(01)00426-7 11864802
13. Hambleton RK Swaminathan H Rogers HJ Fundamentals of Item Response Theory Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications 1991.
14. Lord FM Applications of Item Response Theory to Practical Testing Problems Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates 1990.
15. Linden van der WJ Hambleton RK Handbook of Modern Item Response Theory New York, NY: Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 1997.
16. Cella D Gershon R Lai JS Choi S The future of outcomes measurement: Item banking, tailored short-forms, and computer adaptive assessment Qual Life Res 2007, 16:133-141. 10.1007/s11136-007-9204-6 17401637
17. Wainer H Computer Adaptive Testing: A Primer Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlabaum Associates 2000.
18. Bellamy N Buchanan WW Goldsmith CH Campbell J Stitt LW Validation of WOMAC: A health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee J Rheumatol 1988, 15:1833-1840. 3068365
19. Haley SM Ni P Hambleton R Slavin M Jette AM Computer adaptive testing improved accuracy and precision of scores over random item selection in a physical functioning item bank J Clin Epidemiol 2006, 59:1174-1182. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.02.010 17027428
20. Mislevy RJ Recent developments in the factor analysis of categorical variables Journal of Educational Statistics 1986, 11:3-31. 10.2307/ 1164846
21. Muthen B Muthen L MPlus User's Guide Los Angeles, CA: Muthen & Muthen 1998.
22. Beauducel A Herzberg PY On the performance of maximum likelihood versus means and variance adjusted weighted least squares estimation in CFA Structural Equation Modeling 2006, 13:186-203. 10.1207/s15328007sem1302_2
23. Anderson JC Gerbing DW The effect of sampling error on convergence, improper solutions, and goodness-of-fit indexes for maximum-likelihood confirmatory factor-analysis Psychometrika 1984, 49:155-73. 10.1007/ BF02294170
24. Bentler PM On the fit of models to covariance and methodology Psychol Bull 1992, 112:400-404. 10.1037/0033-2909.112.3.400 1438635
25. Marsh HW Balla JR McDonald RP Goodness of fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size Psychol Bull 1988, 103:391-410. 10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.391
26. Browne MW Cudeck R Alternative ways of assessing model fit Testing Structural Equation Models Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Bollen KA, Long JS 1993, 136-162.
27. Hu LT Bentler PM Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives Structural Equation Modeling 1993, 6:1-55.
28. Reeve BB Hays RD Bjorner JB Psychometric evaluation and calibration of health-related quality of life item banks: Plans for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Med Care 2007, 45:S22-31. 10.1097/01.mlr.0000250483.85507.04 17443115
29. Andrich D Rasch Models for Measurement Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications 1998.
30. Fischer G Molenaar I Rasch Models: Foundations, Recent Developments, and Applications Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag 1995.
31. Masters GN A Rasch model for partial credit scoring Psychometrika 1982, 47:147-174. 10.1007/BF02296272
32. Bjorner JB Chang CH Thissen D Reeve RB Developing tailored instruments: item banking and computerized adaptive assessment Qual Life Res 2007, 16:95-108. 10.1007/s11136-007-9168-6 17530450
33. Warm TA Weighted likelihood estimation of ability in item response theory Psychometrika 1989, 54:427-450. 10.1007/BF02294627
34. Muraki E Block RD PARSCALE: IRT Item Analysis and Test Scoring for Rating - Scale Data Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International 1997.
35. Hariharan S Rogers HJ Detecting differential item functioning using logistic regression procedures Journal of Educational Measurement 1990, 27:361-370. 10.1111/j.1745-3984.1990.tb00754.x
36. Jodoin M Gierl M Evaluating type I error and power rates using an effect size measure with the logistic regression procedure for DIF detection Applied Measurement in Education 2001, 14:329-349. 10.1207/ S15324818AME1404_2
37. Mâsse LC Heesch KC Eason KE Wilson M Evaluating the properties of a stage-specific self-efficacy scale for physical activity using classical test theory, confirmatory factor analysis and item response modeling Health Educ Res 2006, 21:i33-i46. 10.1093/her/cyl106 17035352
38. Ryser L Wright BD Aeschlimann A Mariacher-Gehler S Stucki G A new look at the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index Arthritis Care Res 1999, 12:331-335. 10.1002/ 1529-0131(199910)12:5<331::AID-ART4>3.0.CO;2-W 11081002
39. Baker FB Item Response Theory: Parameter Estimation Techniques New York, NY: Marcel Dekker, Inc. 1992.
40. DeMars CE Sample size and the recovery of nominal response model item parameters Applied Psychological Measurement 2003, 27:275-288. 10.1177/ 0146621603027004003