Posterior Cruciate-Retaining Versus Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty. A Meta-Analysis

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 439-444

  Bercik, Michael J ^a   Joshi, Ashish ^b   Parvizi, Javad ^a  

^a THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Metaanalysis; Posterior cruciate retaining; Posterior stabilized; Prosthesis; Total knee replacement

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COCHRANE LIBRARY; DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS; HEMARTHROSIS; HEMATOMA; HUMAN; KNEE PAIN; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MEDLINE; META ANALYSIS; PATELLA DISLOCATION; POSTERIOR CRUCIATE RETAINING PROSTHESIS; POSTERIOR STABILIZED PROSTHESIS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); RANGE OF MOTION; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WOUND HEALING IMPAIRMENT; WOUND INFECTION;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; HUMANS; KNEE PROSTHESIS; POSTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR;

EID: 84874566796     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: 15328406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.08.008     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Stern S.H., Insall J.N. Posterior stabilized prosthesis. Results after follow-up of nine to twelve years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1992, 74:980.
2. Ritter M.A., et al. Long-term survival analysis of a posterior cruciate-retaining total condylar total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994, 309:136.
3. Bourne R.B., Laskin R.S., Guerin J.S. Ten-year results of the first 100 Genesis II total knee replacement procedures. Orthopedics 2007, 30:83.
4. Bozic K.J., et al. Implant survivorship and complication rates after total knee arthroplasty with a third-generation cemented system: 5 to 8 years followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005, 435:277.
5. Attar F., et al. Survivorship analysis at 15 years of cemented press-fit condylar total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2008, 23:344.
6. Dorr L.D., et al. Functional comparison of posterior cruciate-retained versus cruciate-sacrificed total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988, 236:36.
7. Becker M.W., Insall J.N., Faris P.M. Bilateral total knee arthroplasty. One cruciate retaining and one cruciate substituting. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1991, 271:122.
8. Parsley B., et al. Posterior cruciate ligament substitution is not essential for excellent postoperative outcomes in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2006, 21:127.
9. Andriacchi T.P., Galante J.O., Fermier R.W. The influence of total knee-replacement design on walking and stair-climbing. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1982, 64:1328.
10. Misra A.N., et al. The role of the posterior cruciate ligament in total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2003, 85:389.
11. Kleinbart F., et al. Histological comparison of posterior cruciate ligaments from arthritic and age-matched knee specimens. J Arthroplasty 1996, 11:726.
12. Swanik C.B., Lephart S.M., Rubash H.E. Proprioception, kinesthesia, and balance after total knee arthroplasty with cruciate-retaining and posterior stabilized prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004, 86-A:328.
13. Conditt M., et al. The PCL significantly affects the functional outcome of total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2004, 19:107.
14. Scuderi G.R., Pagnano M.W. Review article: the rationale for posterior cruciate substituting total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2001, 9:81.
15. Ritter M.A., et al. The effect of postoperative range of motion on functional activities after posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008, 90:777.
16. Ritter M.A., Campbell E. Effect of range of motion on the success of a total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1987, 2:95.
17. Pagnano M.W., Cushner F.D., Scott W.N. Role of the posterior cruciate ligament in total knee arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 1998, 6:176.
18. Andriacchi T.P., Galante J.O. Retention of the posterior cruciate in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1988, 3:S13.
19. Victor J., Banks S., Bellemans J. Kinematics of posterior cruciate ligament-retaining and -substituting total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomised outcome study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005, 87:646.
20. Udomkiat P., et al. Functional comparison of posterior cruciate retention and substitution knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2000, 378:192.
21. Kim Y.H., Kim J.S., Yoon S.H. A recession of posterior cruciate ligament in posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthrosplasty. J Arthroplasty 2008, 23:999.
22. Kim Y.H., et al. Functional outcome and range of motion of high-flexion posterior cruciate-retaining and high-flexion posterior cruciate-substituting total knee prostheses. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009, 91:753.
23. Wang C.J., Wang J.W., Chen H.S. Comparing cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty and cruciate-substituting total knee arthroplasty: a prospective clinical study. Chang Gung Med J 2004, 27:578.
24. Chaudhary R., Beaupre L.A., Johnston D.W. Knee range of motion during the first two years after use of posterior cruciate-stabilizing or posterior cruciate-retaining total knee prostheses. A randomized clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008, 90:2579.
25. Tanzer M., Smith K., Burnett S. Posterior-stabilized versus cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty: balancing the gap. J Arthroplasty 2002, 17:813.
26. Clark C.R., et al. Posterior-stabilized and cruciate-retaining total knee replacement: a randomized study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001, 392:208.
27. Straw R., et al. Posterior cruciate ligament at total knee replacement: ESSENTIAL, BENEFICIAL OR A HINDRANCE?. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2003, 85:671.
28. Snider M., MacDonald S. The influence of the posterior cruciate ligament and component design on joint line position after primary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2009, 24:1093.
29. Catani F., et al. The stability of the cemented tibial component of total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2004, 19:775.
30. Harato K., et al. Midterm comparison of posterior cruciate-retaining versus -substituting total knee arthroplasty using the Genesis II prosthesis. A multicenter prospective randomized clinical trial. Knee 2008, 15:217.
31. Yoshiya S., et al. In vivo kinematic comparison of posterior cruciate-retaining and posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasties under passive and weight-bearing conditions. J Arthroplasty 2005, 20:777.
32. Ritter M.A., Faris P.M., Keating E.M. Posterior cruciate ligament balancing during total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1998, 3:323.
33. Jacobs W.C., Clement D.J., Wymenga A.B. Retention versus removal of the posterior cruciate ligament in total knee replacement: a systematic literature review within the Cochrane framework. Acta Orthop 2005, 76:757.
34. Detsky A.S., et al. Incorporating variations in the quality of individual randomized trials into meta-analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 1992, 45:255.
35. Murayama S., et al. Functional comparison of posterior cruciate-retaining versus posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2004, 19:349.
36. Pritchett J.W. Patient preferences in knee prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004, 86:979.
37. Andriacchi T.P., et al. A study of lower-limb mechanics during stair-climbing. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1980, 62:749.
38. Mulholland S.J., Wyss U.P. Activities of daily living in non-Western cultures: range of motion requirements for hip and knee joint implants. Int J Rehabil Res 2001, 24:191.
39. Parsley B.S., Engh G.A., Dwyer K.A. Preoperative flexion. Does it influence postoperative flexion after posterior-cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1992, 275:204.