Historizing Epistemology in Psychology

Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science

Volumn 44, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 310-328

  Jovanović, Gordana ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BELGRADE   (Serbia)

Author keywords

Dilthey; Ebbinghaus; Epistemology; Historical amnesia; History; Natural science; Watson; Windelband; Wundt

Indexed keywords

EID: 79551543835     PISSN: 19324502     EISSN: 19363567     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12124-010-9132-9     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Bibace, R., Clegg, J., & Valsiner, J. (2009). What is in a name? Understanding the implications of participant terminology. IPBS: Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 43, 67-77.
2. Brauns, H.-P. (1987). Ebbinghaus gegen Dilthey-hat die weitere Entwicklung in der Psychologie zu einer Entscheidung geführt. In W. Traxel (Ed.), Ebbinghaus-Studien 2. Passauer Scfriften zur Psychologiegeschichte (pp. 155-177). Passau: Passavia Universitätsverlag.
3. Comte, A. (1975). Course of positive philosophy. In G. Lenzer (Ed.), Auguste Comte and positivism: The essential writings (pp. 71-86). New York: Harper. Original work published 1830.
4. Danziger, K. (1987). Hermann Ebbinghaus and the psychologiucal experiment. In W. Traxel (Ed.), Ebbinghaus-Studien 2. Passauer Schriften zur Psychologiegeschichte (pp. 217-224). Passau: Passavia Universitätsverlag.
5. Danziger, K. (1990). Constructing the subject. Historical origins of psychological research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. Danziger, K. (1994). Generative metaphor and the history of psychological discourse. In D. Leary (Ed.), Metaphors in the history of psychology (pp. 331-356). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. Dilthey, W. (1974). Ideen über eine beschreibende und zergliedernde Psychologie. In W. Dilthey (Ed.), Die gestige Welt: Einleitung in die Philosophie des Lebens (Gesammelte Schriften, B. 5) (pp. 139-240). Stuttgart: Teubner. First edition published 1894.
8. Dilthey, W. (1988). Introduction to the human sciences: An attempt to lay a foundation for the study of society and history. (R. Betanzos, Trans.). London: Harvester Wheatsheaf. Original work published 1883.
9. Diriwächter, R. (2004). Völkerpsychologie: the synthesis that never was. Culture and Psychology, 10(1), 85-109.
10. Eagleton, T. (1996). The illusions of postmodernism. Oxford: Blackwell.
11. Ebbinghaus, H. (1885). Über das Gedächtnis. Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot.
12. Ebbinghaus, H. (1896). Über erklärende und beschreibende Psychologie. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 9, 161-205.
13. Ebbinghaus, H. (1908). Abriß der Psychologie. Leipzig: Feit.
14. Gergen, K. (2001). Psychological science in a postmodern context. American Psychologist, 56(10), 803-813.
15. Greenwood, J. (2003). Disappearance of the social in American social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16. Habermas, J. (1968). Erkenntnis und Interesse. Frankfurt/M: Suhrkamp.
17. Hodges, H. A. (1952). The philosophy of Wilhelm Dilthey. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
18. Jaeger, K., & Staeuble, I. (1978). Die gesellschaftliche Genese der Psychologie. Frankfurt/M: Campus Verlag.
19. Kusch, M. (1999). Psychological knowledge. A social history and philosophy. London: Routledge.
20. Mead, G.-H. (1934). Mind, self and society. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
21. Michell, J. (2003). The quantitative imperative: positivism, naive realism and the place of qualitative methods in psychology'. Theory & Psychology, 13(1), 5-31.
22. Porter, T. (1995). Trust in numbers: The pursuit of objectivity in science and public life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
23. Rodi, F. (1987). Die Ebbinghaus-Dilthey-Kontroverse. Biographischer Hintergrund und sachlicher Ertrag. In W. Traxel (Ed.), Ebbinghaus-Studien 2, Passauer Schriften zur Psychologiegeschichte (pp. 145-154). Passau: Passavia Universitätsverlag.
24. Schwarz, M. (2009). Is psychology based on a methodological error? IPBS: Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 43(3), 185-213.
25. Toomela, A. (2007). Culture of science. Strange history of the methodological thinking in psychology. IPBS: Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 41(1), 6-20.
26. Valsiner, J. (2003). Editorial introduction: beyond intersubjectivity. Culture & Psychology, 9(3), 187-192.
27. Valsiner, J. (2006). Dangerous curves in knowledge construction within psychology. Fragmentation of methodology. Theory & Psychology, 16(5), 587-595.
28. Valsiner, J. (2009). Integrating psychology within the globalizing world: a requiem to the post-modernist experiment with Wissenschaft. IPBS: Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 43(1), 1-21.
29. Watson, J. B. (1913). Psychology as the behaviorist views it. Psychological Review, 20, 158-177. Available via http://psychclassics. yorku. ca/Watson/views. htm. An Internet Resource developed by Ch. Green. Cited April 24th, 2010.
30. Windelband, W. (1876). Über den gegenwärtigen Stand der psychologischen Forschung. Leipzig: Breitkopf & Härtel.
31. Windelband, W. (1998). History and natural science. Theory & Psychology, 8(1), 5-22. Original speech given 1894, published 1900.
32. Wundt, W. (1874). Grundzüge der physiologischen Psychologie. Leipzig: Engelmann.
33. Wundt, W. (1900-1920). Völkerpsychologie, vol. 1-10. Leipzig: Engelmann.
34. Wundt, W. (1904). The principles of physiological psychology (E. Titchener, Trans.). Available via http://psychclassics. yorku. ca/Wundt/Physio. An Internet Resource developed by Ch. Green. Cited April 24th, 2010 (Original work published 1874).
35. Driesch, H. (1926). Grundprobleme der Psychologie: Ihre Krisis in der Gegenwart. Leipzig: E. Reinicke. Originally published as The crisis in psychology in 1925.
36. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
37. Willy, R. (1899). Die Krisis in der Psychologie. Leipzig: Reisland.