A combination of thermal methods to assess coronary pressure and flow dynamics with a pressure-sensing guide wire

Medical Engineering and Physics

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 298-309

  Van der Horst, Arjen ^a   Van't Veer, Marcel ^a,b   Van der Sligte, Robin A M ^a   Rutten, Marcel C M ^a   Pijls, Nico H J ^a,b   Van de Vosse, Frans N ^a  

^a EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b CATHARINA HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Coronary circulatory disease; Flow dynamics; Pressure wire; Thermal anemometry; Thermodilution

Indexed keywords

AVERAGE FLOWS; CALIBRATION FUNCTIONS; CONSTANT TEMPERATURE; CONTINUOUS INFUSIONS; DIFFERENT PRESSURES; ELECTRICAL POWER; FLOW DYNAMICS; GUIDE-WIRE; HEART RATES; IN-VITRO; LOCAL SHEAR RATES; PEAK FLOWS; RELATIVE ERRORS; THERMAL ANEMOMETRY; THERMAL METHODS; THERMODILUTION; THERMODILUTION METHODS;

SHEAR FLOW; WIRE;

HEART;

ARTICLE; CALIBRATION; CORONARY ARTERY PRESSURE; DIASTOLE; ENVIRONMENTAL TEMPERATURE; FLOW DYNAMICS; FLOW RATE; GUIDE WIRE; HEART RATE; HEMODYNAMICS; PRESSURE SENSOR TIPPED GUIDE WIRE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SHEAR RATE; THERMAL ANALYSIS; THERMAL ANEMOMETRY; THERMODILUTION; VALIDATION PROCESS;

BLOOD PRESSURE; CALIBRATION; CARDIOLOGY; CORONARY CIRCULATION; CORONARY DISEASE; DIASTOLE; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HEMODYNAMICS; HOT TEMPERATURE; HUMANS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TEMPERATURE; THERMODILUTION;

EID: 84874531129     PISSN: 13504533     EISSN: 18734030     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2012.05.002     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Siebes M., Kolyva C., Verhoeff B.J., Piek J.J., Spaan J.A. Potential and limitations of wave intensity analysis in coronary arteries. Med Biol Eng Comput 2009, 47(2):233-239.
2. Waters S.L., Alastruey J., Beard D.A., Bovendeerd P.H.M., Davies P.F., Jayaraman G., et al. Theoretical models for coronary vascular biomechanics: progress & challenges. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 2011, 104(1-3):49-76.
3. Mancini G.B.J., Mcgillem M.J., Deboe S.F., Gallagher K.P. The diastolic hyperemic flow versus pressure relation-a new index of coronary stenosis severity and flow reserve. Circulation 1989, 80(4):941-950.
4. Hirsch A., Nijveldt R., Haeck J.D., Beek A.M., Koch K.T., Henriques J.P., et al. Relation between the assessment of microvascular injury by cardiovascular magnetic resonance and coronary Doppler flow velocity measurements in patients with acute anterior wall myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008, 51(23):2230-2238.
5. Escaned J., Flores A., Garcia-Pavia P., Segovia J., Jimenez J., Aragoncillo P., et al. Assessment of microcirculatory remodeling with intracoronary flow velocity and pressure measurements validation with endomyocardial sampling in cardiac allografts. Circulation 2009, 120(16):1561-1568.
6. Okcular I., Sezer M., Aslanger E., Cimen A., Umman B., Nisanci Y., et al. The accuracy of deceleration time of diastolic coronary flow measured by transthoracic echocardiography in predicting long-term left ventricular infarct size and function after reperfused myocardial infarction. Eur J Echocardiogr 2010, 11(10):823-828.
7. Davies J.E., Whinnett Z.I., Francis D.P., Manisty C.H., guado Sierra J., Willson K., et al. Evidence of a dominant backward-propagating " suction" wave responsible for diastolic coronary filling in humans, attenuated in left ventricular hypertrophy. Circulation 2006, 113(14):1768-1778.
8. Parker K.H., Jones C.J. Forward and backward running waves in the arteries: analysis using the method of characteristics. J Biomech Eng 1990, 112(3):322-326.
9. Sun Y.H., Anderson T.J., Parker K.H., Tyberg J.V. Wave-intensity analysis: a new approach to coronary hemodynamics. J Appl Physiol 2000, 89(4):1636-1644.
10. Siebes M., Verhoeff B.J., Meuwissen M., de Winter R.J., Spaan J.A.E., Piek J.J. Single-wire pressure and flow velocity measurement to quantify coronary stenosis hemodynamics and effects of percutaneous interventions. Circulation 2004, 109(6):756-762.
11. Kern M.J., Lerman A., Bech J.W., Bruyne B.D., Eeckhout E., Fearon W.F., et al. Physiological assessment of coronary artery disease in the cardiac catheterization laboratory-a scientific statement from the american heart association committee on diagnostic and interventional cardiac catheterization, council on clinical cardiology. Circulation 2006, 114(12):1321-1341.
12. Ganz P., Hsue P.Y. Assessment of structural disease in the coronary microvasculature. Circulation 2009, 120(16):1555-1557.
13. Tonino P.A.L., De B.B., Pijls N.H.J., Siebert U., Ikeno F., van't Veer M., et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med 2009, 360(3):213-224.
14. van der Horst A., Geven M.C.F., Rutten M.C.M., Pijls N.H.J., van de Vosse F.N. Thermal anemometric assessment of coronary flow reserve with a pressure-sensing guide wire: an in vitro evaluation. Med Eng Phys 2011, 33(6):684-691.
15. van't Veer M., Geven M.C.F., Rutten M.C.M., van der Horst A., Aarnoudse W.H., Pijls N.H.J., et al. Continuous infusion thermodilution for assessment of coronary flow: Theoretical background and in vitro validation. Med Eng Phys 2009, 31(6):688-694.
16. Aarnoudse W., van't Veer M., Pijls N.H.J., ter Woorst J., Vercauteren S., Tonino P., et al. Direct volumetric blood flow measurement in coronary arteries by thermodilution. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007, 50(24):2294-2304.
17. Geven M.C.F., Bohte V.N., Aarnoudse W.H., van den Berg P.M.J., Rutten M.C.M., Pijls N.H.J., et al. A physiologically representative in vitro model of the coronary circulation. Physiol Meas 2004, 25(4):891-904.
18. Clark C. Thin-film gauge for fluctuating velocity measurements in blood. J Phys E: Sci Instrum 1974, 7(7):548-556.
19. Bland J.M., Altman D.G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986, 327(8476):307-310.
20. Bland J.M., Altman D.G. Comparing methods of measurement: why plotting difference against standard method is misleading. Lancet 1995, 346:1085-1087.
21. Womersley J.R. Method for the calculation of velocity, rate of flow and viscous drag in arteries when the pressure gradient is known. J Physiol 1955, 127:553-563.
22. Cuisset T., Beauloye C., Melikian N., Hamilos M., Sarma J., Sarno G., et al. In vitro and in vivo studies on thermistor-based intracoronary temperature measurements: effect of pressure and flow. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2009, 73:224-230.
23. Toutouzas K., Tsiamis E., Drakopoulou M., Stefanadis C. Regarding the study in vitro and in vivo studies on thermistor-based intracoronary temperature measurements: effect of pressure and flow. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2004, 74:815-816.
24. Stefanadis C., Toutouzas K., Tsiamis E., Mitropoulos I., Tsioufis C., Kallikazaros I., et al. Thermal heterogeneity in stable human coronary atherosclerotic plaques is underestimated in vivo: the " cooling effect" of blood flow. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003, 41:403-408.
25. ten Have A., Gijsen F., Wentzel J., Slager C., van der Steen A. Temperature distribution in atherosclerotic coronary arteries: influence of plaque geometry and flow (a numerical study). Phys Med Biol 2004, 49:4447-4462.
26. Sen S., Escaned J., Malik I., Mikhail G., Foale R., Mila R., et al. Development and validation of a new adenosine-independent index of stenosis severity from coronary wave-intensity analysis, results of the ADVISE (adenosine vasodilator independent stenosis evaluation) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012, 59(15):1392-1402.
27. Berry C., van't Veer M., Fearon W., Kala P., Witt N., Pyxaras S., et al. Comparison of fractional flow reserve versus instant wave-free ratio for assessment of coronary artery stenosis severity in routine practice. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012, 59(13). E1384-E1384.
28. Krams R., ten Cate F.J., Carlier S.G., van der Steen A.F.W., Serruys P.W. Diastolic coronary vascular reserve: a new index to detect changes in the coronary microcirculation in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004, 43(4):670-677.