Thermal anemometric assessment of coronary flow reserve with a pressure-sensing guide wire: An in vitro evaluation

Medical Engineering and Physics

Volumn 33, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 684-691

  van der Horst, Arjen ^a   Geven, Maartje C F ^a   Rutten, Marcel C M ^a   Pijls, Nico H J ^a,b   van de Vosse, Frans N ^a  

^a EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b CATHARINA HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Anemometry; CFR; Coronary artery disease; Coronary shear rate; Thermal convection

Indexed keywords

ANEMOMETRY; CFR; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; SHEAR RATES; THERMAL CONVECTIONS;

ANEMOMETERS; BLOOD VESSELS; DISEASES; ELECTRICITY; FLOW MEASUREMENT; FLOWMETERS; HEART; RATING; SHEAR DEFORMATION; WIRE;

SHEAR FLOW;

ANEMOMETRY; ARTICLE; CALIBRATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY FLOW RESERVE; ELECTRICITY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FLOW MEASUREMENT; GUIDE WIRE; IN VITRO STUDY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; SHEAR RATE; TEMPERATURE; THEORETICAL MODEL; THERMODYNAMICS; ULTRASOUND;

BIOSENSING TECHNIQUES; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY CIRCULATION; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMANS; PRESSURE; RHEOLOGY; SHEAR STRENGTH; TEMPERATURE; THERMAL CONDUCTIVITY; ULTRASONICS;

EID: 79959533597     PISSN: 13504533     EISSN: 18734030     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2011.01.004     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Isner J.M., Kishel J., Kent K.M., Ronan J.A., Ross A.M., Roberts W.C. Accuracy of angiographic determination of left main coronary arterial narrowing-angiographic-histologic correlative analysis in 28 patients. Circulation 1981, 63(5):1056-1064.
2. Kern M.J., de Bruyne B., Pijls N.H.J. From research to clinical practice: current role of intracoronary physiologically based decision making in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997, 30(3):613-620.
3. Pijls N.H.J., de Bruyne B., Peels K., van der Voort P., Bonnier H.J.R.M., Bartunek J., et al. Measurement of fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of coronary-artery stenoses. N Engl J Med 1996, 334(26):1703-1708.
4. Tonino P.A.L., de Bruyne B., Pijls N.H.J., Siebert U., Ikeno F., van 't Veer M., et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med 2009, 360(3):213-224.
5. de Bruyne B., Bartunek J., Sys S.U., Pijls N.H.J., Heyndrickx G.R., Wijns W. Simultaneous coronary pressure and flow velocity measurements in humans-feasibility, reproducibility, and hemodynamic dependence of coronary flow velocity reserve, hyperemic flow versus pressure slope index, and fractional flow reserve. Circulation 1996, 94(8):1842-1849.
6. Meuwissen M., Siebes M., Spaan J.A.E., Piek J.J. Rationale of combined intracoronary pressure and flow velocity measurements. Z Kardiol 2002, 91:III108-III112.
7. Siebes M., Verhoeff B.J., Meuwissen M., de Winter R.J., Spaan J.A.E., Piek J.J. Single-wire pressure and flow velocity measurement to quantify coronary stenosis hemodynamics and effects of percutaneous interventions. Circulation 2004, 109(6):756-762.
8. Kern M.J., Lerman A., Bech J.W., Bruyne B.D., Eeckhout E., Fearon W.F., et al. Physiological assessment of coronary artery disease in the cardiac catheterization laboratory-a scientific statement from the american heart association committee on diagnostic and interventional cardiac catheterization, council on clinical cardiology. Circulation 2006, 114(12):1321-1341.
9. Ganz P., Hsue P.Y. Assessment of structural disease in the coronary microvasculature. Circulation 2009, 120(16):1555-1557.
10. de Bruyne B., Pijls N.H.J., Smith L., Wievegg M., Heyndrickx G.R. Coronary thermodilution to assess flow reserve-experimental validation. Circulation 2001, 104(17):2003-2006.
11. Pijls N.H.J., de Bruyne B., Smith L., Aarnoudse W., Barbato E., Bartunek J., et al. Coronary thermodilution to assess flow reserve: validation in humans. Circulation 2002, 105(21):2482-2486.
12. Aarnoudse W., van 't Veer M., Pijls N.H.J., ter Woorst J., Vercauteren S., Tonino P., et al. Direct volumetric blood flow measurement in coronary arteries by thermodilution. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007, 50(24):2294-2304.
13. van 't Veer M., Geven M.C.F., Rutten M.C.M., van der Horst A., Aarnoudse W.H., Pijls N.H.J., et al. Continuous infusion thermodilution for assessment of coronary flow: Theoretical background and in vitro validation. Med Eng Phys 2009, 31(6):688-694.
14. Kern M.J. Interpretation of cardiac pathophysiology from pressure waveform analysis: coronary hemodynamics. Part II: Patterns of coronary flow velocity. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1992, 25(2):154-160.
15. Kern M.J., Aguirre F.V., Donohue T.J., Bach R.G., Caracciolo E.A., Flynn M.S., et al. Continuous coronary flow velocity monitoring during coronary interventions: velocity trend patterns associated with adverse events. Am Heart J 1994, 128(3):426-434.
16. Seed W.A., Wood N.B. Use of a hot-film velocity probe for cardiovascular studies. J Phys E Sci Instrum 1970, 3(5):377-384.
17. Seed W.A., Wood N.B. Development and evaluation of a hot-film velocity probe for cardiovascular studies. Cardiovasc Res 1970, 4(2):253-263.
18. Seed W.A., Wood N.B. Application of constant temperature anemometry in measurement of intra-arterial blood flow velocity. Int J Eng Sci 1972, 10(12):1009-1021.
19. Clark C. Thin-film gauge for fluctuating velocity measurements in blood. J Phys E Sci Instrum 1974, 7(7):548-556.
20. Nerem R.M., Rumberger J.A., Gross D.R., Muir W.W., Geiger G.L. Hot film coronary artery velocity measurements in horses. Cardiovasc Res 1976, 10(3):301-313.
21. Paulsen P.K. The hot-film anemometer-a method for blood velocity determination. I. Invitro comparison with the electromagnetic blood flowmeter. Eur Surg Res 1980, 12(2):140-148.
22. Paulsen P.K. The hot-film anemometer-a method for blood velocity determination. II. Invivo comparison with the electromagnetic blood flowmeter. Eur Surg Res 1980, 12(2):149-158.
23. Bellhouse B.J., Rasmussen C.G. Low-frequency characteristics of hot-film anemometers. DISA Inf 1968, 6:3-10.
24. Pedley T.J. On the forced heat-transfer from a hot film embedded in wall in two-dimensional unsteady flow. J Fluid Mech 1972, 55(2):329-357.
25. Pedley T.J. Two-dimensional boundary-layers in a free stream which oscillates without reversing. J Fluid Mech 1972, 55(2):359-383.
26. Pedley T.J. Viscous boundary layers in reversing flow. J Fluid Mech 1976, 74(1):59-79.
27. Bruun H.H. Hot-film anemometry in liquid flows. Meas Sci Technol 1996, 7(10):1301-1312.
28. Pfeifer P., Schubert K. Hot wire anemometry for experimental determination of flow distribution in multilayer microreactors. Chem Eng J 2008, 135:S173-S178.
29. Uchiyama H., Ide M. Development of a hot-film anemometer calibrator for water flow measurement. Flow Meas Instrum 2009, 20(2):75-80.
30. Segers P., Vanderberghe S., Decryenaere J., Poelaert J., Wouters P., Colardyn F., et al. Hydraulic bench testing of the truCCATH™/truCCOMM™ continuous cardiac output monitor. Cardiovasc Eng 2003, 3(3):93-102.
31. Leather H.A., Vuylsteke A., Bert C., M'Fam W., Segers P., Sergeant P., et al. Evaluation of a new continuous cardiac output monitor in off-pump coronary artery surgery. Anaesthesia 2004, 59(4):385-389.
32. Claessens T., Verwilst P., Missant C., Claus P., Verdonck P., Wouters P., et al. In vitro, in vivo and numerical assessment of the working principle of the truCCOMMS™ continuous cardiac output catheter system. Med Eng Phys 2009, 31(10):1299-1306.
33. Schlichting H., Gersten K. Boundary-Layer Theory 2000, Springer-Verlag, Berlin. 8th ed.
34. Tsangaris S. Oscillatory flow of an incompressible, viscous-fluid in a straight annular pipe. J Mecanique Theor Appl 1984, 3(3):467-478.
35. Bland J.M., Altman D.G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986, 327(8476):307-310.
36. Agah R., Pearce J.A., Welch A.J., Motamedi M. Rate process model for arterial tissue thermal damage: implications on vessel photocoagulation. Lasers Surg Med 1994, 15(2):176-184.
37. Pfefer T.J., Choi B., Vargas G., McNally K.M., Welch A.J. Pulsed laser-induced thermal damage in whole blood. J Biomech Eng 2000, 122(2):196-202.