Exploring the Capabilities of the Geobiosphere's Microbial Genome

AIChE Journal

Volumn 59, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 688-698

  Papoutsakis, Eleftherios T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE   (United States)

Author keywords

Complex phenotypes; Genome engineering; Genomic diversity; Metabolic engineering; Metagenomics; Synthetic biochemistry; Synthetic biology

Indexed keywords

EID: 84874516533     PISSN: 00011541     EISSN: 15475905     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/aic.14032     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Bartholomew WH, Karow EO, Sfat MR, Wilhelm RH. Oxygen transfer and agitation in submerged fermentations - mass transfer of oxygen in submerged fermentation of streptomyces-griseus. Ind Eng Chem. 1950;42(9):1801-1809.
2. Hixson AW, Gaden EL. Oxygen transfer in submerged fermentation. Ind Eng Chem. 1950;42(9):1792-1801.
3. Woodruff LBA, Gill RT. Engineering genomes in multiplex. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2011;22(4):576-583.
4. Patnaik R. Engineering complex phenotypes in industrial strains. Biotechnol Progr. 2008;24(1):38-47.
5. Wisselink HW, Toirkens MJ, Wu Q, Pronk JT, van Maris AJA. Novel evolutionary engineering approach for accelerated utilization of glucose, xylose, and arabinose mixtures by engineered saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009;75(4):907-914.
6. Borden JR, Jones SW, Indurthi D, Chen Y, Papoutsakis ET. A genomic-library based discovery of a novel, possibly synthetic, acid-tolerance mechanism in Clostridium acetobutylicum involving non-coding RNAs and ribosomal RNA processing. Metab Eng. 2010;12(3):268-281.
7. Nicolaou SA, Gaida SM, Papoutsakis ET. A comparative view of metabolite and substrate stress and tolerance in microbial bioprocessing: From biofuels and chemicals, to biocatalysis and bioremediation. Metab Eng. 2010;12(4):307-331.
8. Blaby IK, Lyons BJ, Wroclawska-Hughes E, Phillips GCF, Pyle TP, Chamberlin SG, Benner SA, Lyons TJ, de Crécy-Lagard V, de Crécy E. Experimental evolution of a facultative thermophile from a mesophilic ancestor. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012;78(1):144-155.
9. Smidt H, de Vos WM. Anaerobic microbial dehalogenation. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2004;58:43-73.
10. Knoshaug EP, Zhang M. Butanol tolerance in a selection of microorganisms. Applied Biochem Biotechnol. 2009;153(1-2):13-20.
11. Ruhl J, Schmid A, Blank LM. Selected pseudomonas putida strains able to grow in the presence of high butanol concentrations. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009;75(13):4653-4656.
12. Cox MM, Battista JR. Deinococcus radiodurans - the consummate survivor. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2005;3(11):882-892.
13. Takahashi K, Yamanaka S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell. 2006;126(4):663-676.
14. Preidis GA, Versalovic J. Targeting the human microbiome with antibiotics, probiotics, and prebiotics: gastroenterology enters the metagenomics era. Gastroenterol. 2009;136(6):2015-2031.
15. Sonnenburg JL, Fischbach MA. Community health care: therapeutic opportunities in the human microbiome. Sci Trans Med. 2011;3(78): 78ps12. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3001626.
16. Zhu YM, Luo TM, Jobin C, Young HA. Gut microbiota and probiotics in colon tumorigenesis. Cancer Lett. 2011;309(2):119-127.
17. Veening JW, Smits WK, Kuipers OP. Bistability, epigenetics and bet-hedging in bacteria. Ann Rev Microbiol. 2008:62;193-210.
18. Veening JW, Stewart EJ, Berngruber TW, Taddei F, Kuipers OP, Hamoen LW. Bet-hedging and epigenetic inheritance in bacterial cell development. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 2008;105(11):4393-4398.
19. USA National Research Council. Committee on Metagenomics: Challenges and Functional Applications. USA National Academies Press. In: The new science of metagenomics : revealing the secrets of our microbial planet. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2007.
20. Whitman WB, Coleman DC, Wiebe WJ. Prokaryotes: The unseen majority. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 1998;95(12):6578-6583.
21. Amann RI, Ludwig W, Schleifer KH. Phylogenetic identification and in-situ detection of individual microbial-cells without cultivation. Microbiol Rev. 1995;59(1):143-169.
22. Riesenfeld CS, Schloss PD, Handelsman J. Metagenomics: genomic analysis of microbial communities. Ann Rev Genet. 2004;38:525-552.
23. Taupp M, Mewis K, Hallam SJ. The art and design of functional metagenomic screens. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2011;22(3):465-472.
24. Schloss PD, Handelsman J. Introducing DOTUR, a computer program for defining operational taxonomic units and estimating species richness. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005;71(3):1501-1506.
25. Schloss PD, Handelsman J. A statistical toolbox for metagenomics: assessing functional diversity in microbial communities. Bmc Bioinform. 2008;9:34.
26. Schmeisser C, Steele H, Streit WR. Metagenomics, biotechnology with non-culturable microbes. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2007;75(5):955-962.
27. Warren RL, Freeman JD, Levesque RC, Smailus DE, Flibotte S, Holt RA. Transcription of foreign DNA in Escherichia coli. Genome Res. 2008;18(11):1798-1805.
28. Gabor EM, Alkema WB, Janssen DB. Quantifying the accessibility of the metagenome by random expression cloning techniques. Environ Microbiol. 2004;6(9):879-886.
29. Schloss PD, Handelsman J. Biotechnological prospects from metagenomics. Current Opin Biotechnol. 2003;14(3):303-310.
30. Schloss PD, Handelsman J. Toward a census of bacteria in soil. Plos Comput Biol. 2006;2(7):786-793.
31. Hatzimanikatis V, Li CH, Ionita JA, Henry CS, Jankowski MD, Broadbelt LJ. Exploring the diversity of complex metabolic networks. Bioinform. 2005;21(8):1603-1609.
32. Li CH, Henry CS, Jankowski MD, Ionita JA, Hatzimanikatis V, Broadbelt LJ. Computational discovery of biochemical routes to specialty chemicals. Chem Eng Sci. 2004;59(22-23):5051-5060.
33. Mavrovouniotis ML, Stephanopoulos G, Stephanopoulos G. Computer-aided synthesis of biochemical pathways. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1990;36(11):1119-1132.
34. Broadbelt LJ, Stark SM, Klein MT. Computer-generated pyrolysis modeling - on-the-fly generation of species, reactions, and rates. Ind Eng Chem Res. 1994;33(4):790-799.
35. Ugi I, Bauer J, Brandt J, Friedrich JGasteiger JJochum CSchuber W. New applications of computers in chemistry. Angew Chemie Int Ed. 1979;18(2):111-123.
36. Finley SD, Broadbelt LJ, Hatzimanikatis V. Computational framework for predictive biodegradation. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2009;104(6):1086-1097.
37. Dai MH, Copley SD. Genome shuffling improves degradation of the anthropogenic pesticide pentachlorophenol by Sphingobium chlorophenolicum ATCC 39723. App Environ Microbiol. 2004;70(4):2391-2397.
38. Patnaik R, Louie S, Gavrilovic V, Perry K, Stemmer WPC, Ryan CM, del Cardayré S. Genome shuffling of Lactobacillus for improved acid tolerance. Nature Biotechnol. 2002;20(7):707-712.
39. Wang YH, Li Y, Pei XL, Yu L, Feng Y. Genome-shuffling improved acid tolerance and L-lactic acid volumetric productivity in Lactobacillus rhamnosus. J Biotechnol. 2007;129(3):510-515.
40. Zhang YX, Perry K, Vinci VA, Powell K, Stemmer WPC, del Cardayre SB. Genome shuffling leads to rapid phenotypic improvement in bacteria. Nature. 2002;415(6872):644-646.
41. Alper H, Moxley J, Nevoigt E, Fink GR, Stephanopoulos G. Engineering yeast transcription machinery for improved ethanol tolerance and production. Science. 2006;314(5805):1565-1568.
42. Wang HH, Isaacs FJ, Carr PA, Sun ZZ, Xu G, Forest CR, Chruch GM. Programming cells by multiplex genome engineering and accelerated evolution. Nature. 2009;460(7257):894-898.
43. Warner JR, Reeder PJ, Karimpour-Fard A, Woodruff LBA, Gill RT. Rapid profiling of a microbial genome using mixtures of barcoded oligonucleotides. Nature Biotechnol. 2010;28(8):856-862.
44. Fernandez-Arrojo L, Guazzaroni ME, Lopez-Cortes N, Beloqui A, Ferrer M. Metagenomic era for biocatalyst identification. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2010;21(6):725-733.
45. Nicolaou SA, Gaida SM, Papoutsakis ET. Coexisting/coexpressing genomic libraries (CoGeL) identify interactions among distantly located genetic loci for developing complex microbial phenotypes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39(22):e152.
46. Nicolaou SA, Gaida SM, Papoutsakis ET. Exploring the combinatorial genomic space in Escherichia coli for ethanol tolerance. Biotechnol J. 2012;7(11):1337-1345.
47. Borden JR, Jones SW, Indurthi D, Chen YL, Papoutsakis ET. A genomic-library based discovery of a novel, possibly synthetic, acid-tolerance mechanism in Clostridium acetobutylicum involving non-coding RNAs and ribosomal RNA processing. Metab Eng. 2010;12(3):268-281.
48. Borden JR, Papoutsakis ET. Dynamics of genomic-library enrichment and identification of solvent tolerance genes for Clostridium acetobutylicum. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007;73(9):3061-3068.
49. Zingaro KA, Papoutsakis ET. Toward a semisynthetic stress response system to engineer microbial solvent tolerance. Mbio. 2012;3(5):e00308-12. doi:10.1128/mBio.00308-12.
50. Zingaro KA, Terry Papoutsakis E. GroESL overexpression imparts Escherichia coli tolerance to i-, n-, and 2-butanol, 1, 2, 4-butanetriol and ethanol with complex and unpredictable patterns. Metab Eng. 2013;15(1):196-205.
51. Tracy BP, Gaida SM, Papoutsakis ET. Flow cytometry for bacteria: enabling metabolic engineering, synthetic biology and the elucidation of complex phenotypes. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2010;21(1):85-99.
52. Zhang FZ, Carothers JM, Keasling JD. Design of a dynamic sensor-regulator system for production of chemicals and fuels derived from fatty acids. Nature Biotechnol. 2012;30(4):354-359.
53. Gredell JA, Frei CS, Cirino PC. Protein and RNA engineering to customize microbial molecular reporting. Biotechnol J. 2012;7(4):477-499.
54. Lynch MD, Warnecke T, Gill RT. SCALEs: multiscale analysis of library enrichment. Nature Methods. 2007;4(1):87-93.
55. Reyes LH, Almario MP, Winkler J, Orozco MM, Kao KC. Visualizing evolution in real time to determine the molecular mechanisms of n-butanol tolerance in Escherichia coli. Metab Eng. 2012;14(5):579-590.