Attention modulates sensory suppression during back movements

Consciousness and Cognition

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 420-429

  Van Hulle, Lore ^a   Juravle, Georgiana ^b   Spence, Charles ^b   Crombez, Geert ^a   Van Damme, Stefaan ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Attention; Back movement; Sensory suppression; Tactile perception

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; BACK; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION; MALE; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTION; SENSORY STIMULATION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE; TOUCH;

EID: 84874515202     PISSN: 10538100     EISSN: 10902376     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2013.01.011     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Banich M.T. Cognitive neuroscience and neuropsychology 2004, Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston.
2. Bays P.M., Wolpert D.M. Computational principles of sensorimotor control that minimize uncertainty and variability. Journal of Physiology 2007, 578:387-396.
3. Borenstein M., Hedges L.V., Higgins J.P.T., Rothstein H.R. Introduction to meta-analysis 2009, Wiley, West Sussex (UK).
4. Brainard D.H. The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision 1997, 10:433-436.
5. Chapman C.E., Beauchamp E. Differential controls over tactile detection in humans by motor commands and peripheral reafference. Journal of Neurophysiology 2006, 96:1664-1675.
6. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences 1988, McGraw-Hill, San Diego (CA).
7. Corbetta M., Shulman G.L. Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2002, 3:201-215.
8. Coulter Sensory transmission through lemniscal pathway during voluntary movement in cat. Journal of Neurophysiology 1976, 37:831-845.
9. Crombez G., Van Damme S., Eccleston C. Hypervigilance to pain: An experimental and clinical analysis. Pain 2005, 116:4-7.
10. Crombez G., Vervaet L., Lysens R., Baeyens F., Eelen P. Avoidance and confrontation of painful, back-straining movements in chronic back pain patients. Behavior Modification 1998, 22:62-77.
11. Dick B., Eccleston C., Crombez G. Attentional functioning in fibromyalgia, rheumatoid arthritis, and musculoskeletal pain patients. Arthritis & Rheumatism 2002, 47:639-644.
12. Folk C.L., Remington R.W., Johnston J.C. Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1992, 18:1030-1044.
13. Gallace A., Zeeden S., Röder B., Spence C. Lost in the move? Secondary task performance impairs tactile change detection on the body. Consciousness and Cognition 2010, 19:215-229.
14. Gillmeister H., Forster B. Vision enhances selective attention to body-related information. Neuroscience Letters 2010, 483:184-188.
15. Gillmeister H., Forster B. Hands behind your back: Effects of arm posture on tactile attention in the space behind the body. Experimental Brain Research 2012, 216:489-497.
16. Glass J.M. Review of cognitive dysfunction in fibromyalgia: A convergence on working memory and attentional control impairments. Rheumatic Disease Clinics of North America 2009, 35:299-311.
17. Juravle G., Deubel H., Spence C. Attention and suppression affect tactile perception in reach-to-grasp movements. Acta Psychologica 2011, 138:302-310.
18. Juravle G., Deubel H., Tan H.Z., Spence C. Changes in tactile sensitivity over the time-course of a goal-directed movement. Behavioural Brain Research 2010, 208:391-401.
19. Juravle G., Spence C. Juggling reveals a decisional component to tactile suppression. Experimental Brain Research 2011, 213:87-97.
20. Kóbor I., Füredi L., Kovács G., Spence C., Vidnyánzky Z. Back-to-front: Improved tactile discrimination performance in the space you cannot see. Neuroscience Letters 2006, 400:163-167.
21. Legrain V., Van Damme S., Eccleston C., Davis K.D., Seminowicz D.A., Crombez G. A neurocognitive model of attention to pain: Behavioral and neuroimaging evidence. Pain 2009, 144:230-232.
22. Levitt H. Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1971, 49:467-477.
23. Macmillan N.A., Creelman C.D. Detection theory: A user's guide 2005, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, New Jersey. 2nd ed.
24. Moseley G.L., Gallagher L., Gallace A. Neglect-like tactile dysfunction in chronic back pain. Neurology 2012, 79:327-332.
25. Pelli D.G. The video toolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision 1997, 10:437-442.
26. Post L.J., Zompa I.C., Chapman C.E. Perception of vibrotactile stimuli during motor activity in human subjects. Experimental Brain Research 1994, 100:107-120.
27. Press C., Taylor-Clarke M., Kennett S., Haggard P. Visual enhancement of touch in spatial body representation. Experimental Brain Research 2004, 154:238-245.
28. Santangelo V., Spence C. Is the exogenous orienting of spatial attention truly automatic? Evidence from unimodal and multisensory studies. Consciousness and Cognition 2008, 17:989-1015.
29. Stanislaw H., Todorov N. Calculation of signal detection theory measures. Behaviour Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 1999, 31:137-149.
30. Summerfield C., Egner T. Expectation (and attention) in visual cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2009, 13:403-409.
31. Tipper S.P., Philips N., Dancer C., Lloyd D., Howard L.A., McGlone F. Vision influences tactile perception at body sites that cannot be viewed directly. Experimental Brain Research 2001, 139:160-167.
32. Van Damme S., Crombez G., Notebaert L. Attentional bias to threat: A perceptual accuracy approach. Emotion 2008, 8:820-827.
33. Van Damme S., Legrain V., Vogt J., Crombez G. Keeping pain in mind: A motivational account of attention to pain. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 2010, 34:204-213.
34. Veldhuijzen D.S., Sondaal S.F.V., Oosterman J.M. Intact cognitive inhibition in patients with fibromyalgia but evidence of declined processing speed. Journal of Pain 2012, 13:507-515.
35. Vlaeyen J.W.S., Linton S.J. Fear-avoidance and its consequences in chronic musculoskeletal pain: A state of the art. Pain 2000, 85:317-332.
36. Voss M., Ingram J.N., Wolpert D.M., Haggard P. Mere expectation to move causes attenuation of sensory signals. PLoS One 2008, 3:e2866.
37. Wasaka T., Hoshiyama M., Nakata H., Nishihira Y., Kakigi R. Gating of somatosensory evoked magnetic fields during the preparatory period of self-initiated finger movement. NeuroImage 2003, 20:1830-1838.
38. Weinstein S. Intensitive and extensive aspects of tactile sensitivity as a function of body part, sex and laterality. The skin senses 1968, 195-200. Thomas, Springfield (IL). D.R. Kenshalo (Ed.).
39. Wickens T.D. Elementary signal detection theory 2002, Oxford University Press, New York.
40. Williams S.R., Chapman E.C. Time course and magnitude of movement-related gating of tactile detection in humans. II. Effects of stimulus intensity. Journal of Neurophysiology 2000, 84:863-875.
41. Williams S.R., Chapman E.C. Time course and magnitude of movement-related gating of tactile detection in humans. III. Effect of motor tasks. Journal of Neurophysiology 2002, 88:1968-1979.
42. Williams S.R., Shenasa J., Chapman E. Time course and magnitude of movement-related gating of tactile detection in humans. I. Importance of stimulus location. Journal of Neurophysiology 1998, 79:947-963.
43. Yantis S. Control of visual attention. Attention 1998, 223-256. Psychology Press, Hove, England. H. Pashler (Ed.).