Attention and suppression affect tactile perception in reach-to-grasp movements

Acta Psychologica

Volumn 138, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 302-310

  Juravle, Georgiana ^a   Deubel, Heiner ^b   Spence, Charles ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Attention; Dual tasking; Endogenous; Motor preparation; Tactile suppression

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HAND STRENGTH; HUMAN; MALE; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; TOUCH;

ADULT; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HAND STRENGTH; HUMANS; MALE; MOVEMENT; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; SPACE PERCEPTION; TOUCH; TOUCH PERCEPTION;

EID: 80053335045     PISSN: 00016918     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.08.001     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Bays P.M., Wolpert D.M. Computational principles of sensoriomotor control that minimize uncertainty and variability. The Journal of Physiology 2007, 578:387-396.
2. Blakemore S.J., Frith C.D., Wolpert D.M. Spatio-temporal prediction modulates the perception of self-produced stimuli. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1999, 11:551-559.
3. Buckingham G., Carey P., Colino F.L., deGrosbois J., Binsted G. Gating of vibrotactile detection during visually guided bimanual reaches. Experimental Brain Research 2010, 201:411-419.
4. Chapman C.E., Beauchamp E. Differential controls over tactile detection in humans by motor commands and peripheral reafference. Journal of Neurophysiology 2006, 96:1664-1675.
5. Deubel H., Schneider W.X. Saccade target selection and object recognition: Evidence for a common attentional mechanism. Vision Research 1996, 36:1827-1837.
6. Deubel H., Schneider W.X., Paprotta I. Selective dorsal and ventral processing: Evidence for a common attentional mechanism in reaching and perception. Visual Cognition 1998, 5:81-107.
7. Eimer M., Forster B., Van Velzen J., Prabhu G. Covert manual response preparation triggers attentional shifts: ERP evidence for the premotor theory of attention. Neuropsychologia 2005, 43:957-966.
8. Feix T., Pawlik R., Schmiedmayer H., Romero J., Kragic D. A comprehensive grasp taxonomy. Paper presented at Robotics, Science and Systems: Workshop on Understanding the Human Hand for Advancing Robotic Manipulation 2009, June 28, Washington, USA.
9. Forster B., Eimer M. Covert attention in touch: Behavioural and ERP evidence for costs and benefits. Psychophysiology 2005, 42:171-179.
10. Forster B., Eimer M. Covert unimanual response preparation triggers attention shifts to effectors rather than goal locations. Neuroscience Letters 2007, 419:142-146.
11. Gallace A., Zeeden S., Röder B., Spence C. Lost in the move? Secondary task performance impairs tactile change detection on the body. Consciousness and Cognition 2010, 19:215-229.
12. Geldard F.A. Some neglected possibilities of communication. Science 1960, 131:1583-1588.
13. Gherri E., Van Velzen J., Eimer M. Dissociating effector and movement direction selection during the preparation of manual reaching movements: Evidence from lateralized ERP components. Clinical Neurophysiology 2007, 118:2031-2049.
14. Juravle G., Deubel H. Action preparation enhances the processing of tactile targets. Experimental Brain Research 2009, 198:301-311.
15. Juravle G., Deubel H., Tan H.Z., Spence C. Changes in tactile sensitivity over the time-course of a goal-directed movement. Behavioural Brain Research 2010, 208:391-401.
16. Kandel E.R., Schwartz J.H., Jessell T.M. Principles of neural science 2000, McGraw-Hill, New York. 4th ed.
17. Klein R.M. Inhibition of return. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2000, 4:138-147.
18. Longo M.R., Cardozo S., Haggard P. Visual enhancement of touch and the bodily self. Consciousness and Cognition 2008, 17:1181-1191.
19. Meyer E., Fergusson S.S.G., Zattore R.J., Alivisatos B., Marrett S., Evans A.C., Hakim A.M. Attention modulates somatosensory cerebral blood flow response to vibrotactile stimulation as measured by positron emission tomography. Annals of Neurology 1991, 29:440-443.
20. Miall R.C., Wolpert D.M. Forward models for physiological motor control. Neural Networks 1996, 9:1265-1279.
21. Pashler H. Shifting visual attention and selecting motor responses: Distinct attentional mechanisms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1991, 17:1023-1040.
22. Pashler H. Attentional limitations in doing two tasks at the same time. Current Directions in Psychological Science 1992, 1:44-48.
23. Parkinson A., Plukaard S., Pears S.L., Newport R., Dijkerman C., Jackson S.R. Modulation of somatosensory perception by motor intention. Cognitive Neuroscience 2011, 2:47-56.
24. Press C., Gherri E., Heyes C., Eimer M. Action preparation helps and hinders perception of action. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2010, 22:2198-2211.
25. Press C., Taylor-Clarke M., Kennett S., Haggard P. Visual enhancement of touch in spatial body representation. Experimental Brain Research 2004, 154:238-245.
26. Rizzolatti G., Riggio L., Sheliga B. Space and selective attention. Attention and performance XV 1994, 231-265. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. C. Umilta, M. Moscovitch (Eds.).
27. Rorden C., Driver J. Does auditory attention shift in the direction of an upcoming saccade?. Neuropsychologia 1999, 37:357-377.
28. Rorden C., Greene K., Sasine G.M., Baylis G.C. Enhanced tactile performance at the destination of an upcoming saccade. Current Biology 2002, 12:1-6.
29. Ross J., Morrone M.C., Goldberg M.E., Burr D. Changes in visual perception at the time of saccades. Trends in Neurosciences 2001, 24:113-121.
30. Spence C. Cognitive neuroscience: Searching for the bottleneck in the brain. Current Biology 2008, 18:R965-R968.
31. Spence C., Lloyd D., McGlone F., Nicholls M.E.R., Driver J. Inhibition of return is supramodal: A demonstration between all possible pairings of vision, touch and audition. Experimental Brain Research 2000, 134:42-48.
32. Spence C., McGlone F.P. Reflexive spatial orienting of tactile attention. Experimental Brain Research 2001, 141:324-330.
33. Spence C., Pavani F., Driver J. Crossmodal links between vision and touch in covert endogenous spatial attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2000, 26:1298-1319.
34. Sperry R.W. Neural basis of the spontaneous optokinetic response produced by visual inversion. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 1950, 43:482-489.
35. van der Lubbe R.H.J., Wauschkuhn B., Wascher E., Niehoff T., Kömpf D., Verleger R. Lateralized EEG components with direction information for the preparation of saccades versus finger movements. Experimental Brain Research 2000, 132:163-178.
36. von Bekesy G. Interaction of paired sensory stimuli and conduction in peripheral nerves. Journal of Applied Physiology 1963, 18:1276-1284.
37. von Helmholtz H. Handbook of physiological optics 1867, Voss, Leipzig. first ed.
38. von Holst E., Mittelstaedt H. The re-afference principle. Naturwissenschaften 1950, 37:464-476.
39. Walsh E., Haggard P. The effects of acoustic startle on sensoriomotor attenuation prior to movement. Experimental Brain Research 2008, 189:279-288.
40. Welford A.T. The "psychological refractory period" and the timing of high speed performance - A review and a theory. British Journal of Psychology 1952, 43:2-19.
41. Williams S.R., Chapman C.E. Time course and magnitude of movement related gating of tactile detection in humans. III. Importance of the motor task. Journal of Neurophysiology 2002, 88:1968-1979.
42. Williams S.R., Shenasa J., Chapman C.E. The time course and magnitude of movement-related gating of tactile detection in humans. I. Importance of stimulus location. Journal of Neurophysiology 1998, 79:947-963.
43. Wolpert D.M., Ghahramani Z., Jordan M.I. An internal model for sensoriomotor integration. Science 1995, 269:1880-1882.