Preferences for alternative fuel vehicles by Dutch local governments

Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment

Volumn 20, Issue , 2013, Pages 15-20

  van Rijnsoever, Frank J ^a   Hagen, Paul ^b   Willems, Mandy ^c  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c NL Agency   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Alternative fuel vehicles; Biogas vehicle; Electric vehicle; Local governments; Public procurement

Indexed keywords

BIOGAS; ELECTRIC VEHICLES; INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINES;

ALTERNATIVE FUEL VEHICLES; BATTERY ELECTRIC VEHICLES; CHOICE MODEL; LOCAL EMISSIONS; LOCAL GOVERNMENT; PUBLIC PROCUREMENT;

ALTERNATIVE FUELS;

ALTERNATIVE FUEL; BIOGAS; ELECTRIC VEHICLE; LOCAL GOVERNMENT; TRAFFIC EMISSION;

NETHERLANDS;

EID: 84874512187     PISSN: 13619209     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2013.01.005     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Bunch D.S., Bradley M., Golob T.F., Kitumara R., Occhiuzzo G.P. Demand for clean-fuelvehicles in California: a discrete-choice stated preference pilot project. Transportation Research, A 1993, 27:237-253.
2. Edler J., Georghiou L. Public procurement and innovation-resurrecting the demand side. Research Policy 2007, 36:949-963.
3. Groengasmobiel, 2012. Groengasmobiel. <>. http://www.groengasmobiel.nl/tanken/prijs-van-groengas/.
4. ING Economic Bureau, 2011. Invoed elektrische auto autobranche tot 2020 beperkt, wel kansen for specialisten, Amsterdam.
5. Kragha O.C. Economic Implications of Natural Gas Vehicle Technology in US Private Automobile Transportation 2010, Boston University.
6. Lebutsch P., Weeda M. THRIVE: Study on Roll-out of Fuel Cell Electric Vehicles and Hydrogen Refuelling Infrastructure for the Netherlands 2011, Petten.
7. Lee, B.H., Lovellette, G., 2011. Will Electric Cars Transform The USVehicle Market? An Analysis of The Key Determinants. <>. http://web.hks.harvard.edu/publications/workingpapers/citation.aspx?PubId=7926.
8. Oplaadpalen.nl, 2012. Oplaadpalen.nl. <>. http://www.oplaadpalen.nl.
9. Patterson T., Dinsdale R., Esteves S. Review of energy balances and emissions associated with biomass-based transport fuels relevant to the United Kingdom context. Energy and Fuels 2008, 22:3506-3512.
10. Sælensminde K. Inconsistent choices in stated choice data. Transportation 2001, 28:269-296.
11. 2 aspects of future vehicle options in Europe under new energy policy scenarios. Energy Policy 2010, 38:7142-7151.
12. U.S. Department of Energy, 2012a. Progress and Accomplishments in Hydrogen and Fuel Cells, USDoE, Washington DC.
13. U.S. Department of Energy, 2012b. Fueleconomy.gov. Electric Vehicles, USDoE, Washington DC.
14. Van der Vooren A., Alkemade F., Hekkert M.P. Effective public resource allocation to escape lock-in: the case of infrastructure-dependent vehicle technologies. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 2012, 2:98-117.
15. Van Vliet O.P.R., Kruithof T., Turkenburg W.C., Faaij A.P.C. Techno-economic comparison of series hybrid, plug-in hybrid, fuel cell and regular cars. Journal of Power Sources 2010, 195:6570-6585.
16. Whyatt G. Issues Affecting Adoption of Natural Gas Fuel in Light- and Heavy-Duty Vehicles 2010, Oak Ridge Laboratory, Oak Ridge.