Identifying functional stakeholder clusters to maximise communication for the ecosystem approach to fisheries management

Marine Policy

Volumn 42, Issue , 2013, Pages 56-67

  Duggan, Deirdre E ^a   Farnsworth, Keith D ^a   Kraak, Sarah B M ^b,c  

^a QUEEN'S UNIVERSITY BELFAST   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE CORK   (Ireland)

^c MARINE INSTITUTE   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Content analysis; Decision support system; EAFM; Fishing Industry; Hierarchical clustering; Stakeholder identification

Indexed keywords

COMMUNICATION; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; ECOSYSTEM APPROACH; FISHERY MANAGEMENT; FISHERY MODELING; FISHING INDUSTRY; MODEL TEST; MODEL VALIDATION; STAKEHOLDER;

EID: 84874511798     PISSN: 0308597X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2013.01.023     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. FAO. The ecosystem approach to fisheries. FAO technical guidelines for responsible fisheries; 2003. p. 4.
2. Garcia SM, Cochrane KL. Ecosystem approach to fisheries: a review of implementation guidelines. ICES J Mar Sci 2005, 62:311-318.
3. Walters CJ, WaltersMartell SJD Fisheries ecology and management 2004, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
4. Degnbol D, Eustace B, Frangoudes K, Hatchard J, Hegland TJ, Jacobsen RB, et al. Stakeholder perspectives on fisheries science and modelling - Focus group discussions in Spain, Greece, UK, Denmark and Ireland. Focus group report, WP5 EFIMAS (Operational Evaluation Tools for Fisheries Management) EU 6th framework programe specific targ; 2008. p. 184.
5. Pastoors MA, Poos JJ, Kraak SBM Machiels MAM. Validating management simulation models and implications for communicating results to stakeholders. ICES J Mar Sci 2007, 64:818-824.
6. Wilson DC. The paradoxes of transparency. Science and the ecosystem approach to fisheries management in Europe 2009, Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam.
7. Röckmann C, Ulrich C, Dreyer M, Bell E, Borodzicz E, Haapasaari P, et al. The added value of participatory modelling in fisheries management - what has been learnt?. Mar Policy 2012, 36:1072-1085.
8. Link JS, Ihde TF, Harvey CJ, Gaichas SK, Field JC, Brodziak JKT, et al. Dealing with uncertainty in ecosystem models: the paradox of use for living marine resource management. Prog Oceanogr 2012, 102:102-114.
9. Boschetti F, Richert C, Walker I, Price J, Dutra L. Assessing attitudes and cognitive styles of stakeholders in environmental projects involving computer modelling. Ecol Modelling 2012, 247:98-111.
10. Linke S, Jentoft S. A communicative turnaround: shifting the burden of proof in European fisheries governance. Mar Policy 2013, 38:337-345.
11. Smith WR. Product differentiation and market sedmentation as alternative marketing strategies. J Market 1956, 21:3-8.
12. Moss HB, Kirby SD, Donodeo F. Characterizing and reaching high-risk drinkers using audience segmentation. Alcohol Clin Exp. Res 2009, 33:1336-1345.
13. Maibach EW, Leiserowitz A, Roser-Renouf C, Mertz CK. Identifying like-minded audiences for global warming public engagement campaigns: an audience segmentation analysis and tool development. Plos One 2011, 6:1-9.
14. Degnbol P. Indicators as a means of communicating knowledge. ICES J Mar Sci 2005, 62:606-611.
15. Fulton EA, Smith ADM, Punt AE. Which ecological indicators can robustly detect effects of fishing?. ICES J Mar Sci 2005, 62:540-551.
16. Turban E, Aronson JE. Decision support system and intelligent systems 2001, Prentice-Hall. 6th ed.
17. Brugha R, Varvasovszky Z. Review article stakeholder analysis: a review. Health Policy Plann 2000, 15:239-246.
18. Hilborn R. Defining success in fisheries and conflicts in objectives. Mar Policy 2007, 31:153-158.
19. EC. Directive 2008/56/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008 establishing a framework for community action in the field of marine environment policy (Marine Strategy Framework Directive). Official Journal of the European Union 2008; 164: 19-40.
20. Pita C, Pierce GJ, Theodossiou I. Stakeholders' participation in the fisheries management decision-making process: Fishers' perceptions of participation. Mar Policy 2010, 34:1093-1102.
21. Degnbol P. Science and the user perspective: the gap co-management must address. The Fisheries co-management experience. accomplishments, challenges and prospects 2003, 32-49. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht. D.C. Wilson, J.R. Nielsen, P. Degnbol (Eds.).
22. Powers JE, Monk MH. Current and future use of indicators for ecosystem based fisheries management. Mar Policy 2010, 34:723-727.
23. Plagányi EE. Models for an ecosystem approach to fisheries. FAO Fisheries technical paper, vol. 477; 2007. P. 152.
24. Cotter J. Reforming the European common fisheries policy: a case for capacity and effort controls. Fish Fish 2010, 11:210-219.
25. Langsdale S. Communication of climate change uncertainty to stakeholders using the scenario approach. J Contemp Water Res. Educ 2008, 140:24-29.
26. Smith ADM, Sainsbury KJ, Stevens RA. Implementing effective fisheries-management systems - management strategy evaluation and the Australian partnership approach. ICES J Mar Sci 1999, 56:967-979.
27. Mitchell RK, Agle BR, Wood DJ. Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts. Acad Manage Rev 1997, 22:853-886.
28. Reed MS, Graves A, Dandy N, Posthumus H, Hubacek K, Morris J, et al. Who's in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. J Environ Manage 2009, 90:1933-1949.
29. Biernacki P, Waldorf D. Snowball sampling: problems and techniques of chain referral sampling. Sociol Methods Res 1981, 10:141-163.
30. Freeman RE. Strategic management: a stakeholder approach 1984, Pitman, Boston.
31. Hughey KFD, Cullen R, Kerr GN. Stakeholder groups in fisheries management. Mar Policy 2000, 24:119-127.
32. Mikalsen KH, Jentoft S. From user-groups to stakeholders? The public interest in fisheries management. Mar Policy 2001, 25:281-292.
33. Noy C. Sampling knowledge: the hermeneutics of snowball sampling in qualitative research. Int J Soc Res Methodol 2008, 11:327-344.
34. Corbin J, Strauss A. Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory 2008, Sage Publications. 3rd ed.
35. Stone HL. Graphically modelling stakeholder values. J Am Water Resour Assoc 2002, 38:1019-1026.
36. Neuendorf KA. The content analysis guidebook 2002, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.
37. Kaufman L, Rousseeuw PJ. Finding groups in data: an introduction to cluster analysis 1990, Wiley, New York.
38. Real R, Vargas JM. The probabilistic basis of Jaccard's index of SIMILARITY. System Biol 1996, 45:380-385.
39. Webb TJ, Raffaelli D. Conversations in conservation: revealing and dealing with language differences in environmental conflicts. J Appl Ecol 2008, 45:1198-1204.
40. Sim J. Collecting and analysing qualitative data: issues raised by the focus group. J Adv Nurs 1998, 28:345-352.
41. Collier MJ, Scott MJ. Industrially harvested peatlands and after-use potential: understanding local stakeholder narratives and landscape preferences. Landscape Res 2008, 33:439-460.
42. Blumenschein K, Johannesson M, Blomquist GC, Liljas B, O'Conor RM. Experimental results on expressed certainty and hypothetical bias in contingent valuation. South Econ J 1998, 65:169-177.
43. Cash DW, Clark WC, Alcock F, Dickson NM, Eckley N, Guston DH, et al. Knowledge systems for sustainable development. Proc Natl Acad Sci United States of America 2003; 100: 8086-8091.
44. Planque B, Certain G, Primicerio R, Michalsen K, Jorgensen LL, Aschan M, et al. Ecological resilience for ecologists. ICES CM 2012/A:20 2012; 1-10.
45. Carr LM, Heyman WD. It's about seeing what's actually out there: quantifying fishers' ecological knowledge and biases in a small-scale commercial fishery as a path toward co-management. Ocean Coast Manage 2012, 69:118-132.
46. Berghöfer A, Wittmer H, Rauschmayer F. Stakeholder participation in ecosystem-based approaches to fisheries management: a synthesis from European research projects. Mar Policy 2008, 32:243-253.
47. Quinn TJ, Deriso RB. Quantitative fish dynamics 1999, Oxford University Press.
48. Dankel DJ, Heino M, Dieckmann U. Scientists as facilitators: an objective technique to illustrate a zone of stakeholder consensus. ICES CM/O, vol.28; 2009.
49. Robinson C, Pascoe S. Fisher behaviour: exploring the validity of the profit maximising assumption. CEMARE Portsmouth; 1997. p. 17.
50. Palmer CT, Sinclair PR. Perceptions of a fishery in crisis: dragger skippers on the Gulf of St. Lawrence cod moratorium. Soc Nat Resour 1996, 9:267-279.
51. Paramor OAL, Hatchard JL, Mikalsen KH, Gray TS, Scott CL, Frid CLJ. The integration of stakeholder opinion into the management of marine habitats. ICES CM; 2003. p. 1-16.
52. Bryson JM. What to do when stakeholders matter. Stakeholder identification and analysis techniques. Public Manage Rev 2004, 6:21-53.
53. Varvasovszky Z, Brugha R. How to do ( or not to do)... a stakeholder analysis. Health Policy Plann 2000, 15:338-345.
54. NWWRAC. Response to Commission's Consultation Paper. Future role, composition and functioning of advisory councils (ACs) within the CFP reform; 2010. p. 1-12.
55. Schiller A, Hunsaker CT, Kane MA, Wolfe AK, Dale VH, Suter GW, et al. Communicating ecological indicators to decision makers and the public. Conserv Ecol 2001, 5:19.
56. Hill SL, Watters GM, Punt AE, Mcallister MK, Quere C, Le, Turner J, et al. Model uncertainty in the ecosystem approach to fisheries. Fish Fish 2007, 8:315-336.