Maritime cluster evolution based on symbiosis theory and Lotka-Volterra model

Maritime Policy and Management

Volumn 40, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 161-176

  Zhang, Wei ^a   Lam, Jasmine Siu Lee ^a  

^a NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPARATIVE STUDY; EVOLUTIONARY THEORY; INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT; MARITIME TRANSPORTATION; NUMERICAL MODEL; POLICY MAKING; THEORETICAL STUDY; TRANSPORTATION POLICY;

EID: 84874496237     PISSN: 03088839     EISSN: 14645254     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03088839.2012.757375     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Lazzeretti, L and Capone, F. 2010. Mapping shipbuilding clusters in Tuscany: Main features and policy implications. Maritime Policy & Management, 37(1): 37-52.
2. Porter, ME. 1990. The Competitive Advantage of Nations, London: Macmillan.
3. Bathelt, H, Malmberg, A and Maskell, P. 2004. Clusters and knowledge: Local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Progress in Human Geography, 28(1): 31-56.
4. Martin, R and Sunley, P. 2003. Deconstructing clusters: Chaotic concept or policy panacea?. Journal of Economic Geography, 3(1): 5-35.
5. Sternberg, R and Litzenberger, T. 2004. Regional clusters in Germany: Their geography and their relevance for entrepreneurial activities. European Planning Studies, 12(6): 767-791.
6. Verhetsel, A and Sel, S. 2009. World maritime cities: From which cities do container shipping companies make decisions?. Transport Policy, 16(5): 240-250.
7. Beaverstock, JV, Smith, RG and Taylor, PJ. 1999. A roster of world cities. Cities, 16(6): 445-458.
8. Associates, Fisher. 2004. The future of London's Maritime Services Cluster: A Call for Action, London: Corporation of London.
9. Kwak, S-J, Yoo, S-H and Chang, J-I. 2005. The role of maritime industry in the Korean national economy: An input--output analysis. Marine Policy, 29(4): 371-383.
10. Doloreux, D and Shearmur, R. 2009. Maritime cluster in diverse regional contexts: The case of Canada. Marine Policy, 33(3): 520-527.
11. IANCA, C. and BATRINCA, G., 2010, Towards a Romanian Maritime Cluster. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Maritime & Naval Science and Engineering, September, Constantza, Romania, pp. 94-99
12. Brett, V and Roe, M. 2010. The potential for the clustering of the maritime transport sector in the Greater Dublin Region. Maritime Policy & Management, 37(1): 1-17.
13. Chang, Y-C. 2011. Maritime clusters: What can be learnt from the South West of England. Ocean and Coastal Management, 54(6): 488-494.
14. PORTER, M. E., 1998, The Microeconomic Foundations of Economic Development. The Global Competitiveness Report (Geneva, Switzerland: World Economic Forum)
15. BENITO, G. R. G., BERGER, E., DELA FOREST, M., and SHUM, J., 2000, The Norwegian Maritime Sector in a Cluster Perspective. Research Report 8/2000 (Oslo, Norway: Norwegian School of Management BI)
16. De Langen, PW. 2002. Clustering and performance: The case of maritime clustering in the Netherlands. Maritime Policy & Management, 29(3): 209-221.
17. Jenssen, JI. 2003. Innovation, capabilities and competitive advantage in Norwegian shipping. Maritime Policy & Management, 30(2): 93-106.
18. Peeters, C and Webers, H. 2006. "European maritime clusters: Solving the definition and data puzzle". In Dynamic European Maritime Clusters, Edited by: Wijnolst, N. 135-146. Delft, The Netherlands: IOS Press.
19. Doloreux, D and Melancon, Y. 2008. On the dynamics of innovation in Quebec's coastal maritime industry. Technovation, 28(4): 231-243.
20. Shinohara, M. 2010. Maritime cluster of Japan: Implications for the cluster formation policies. Maritime Policy & Management, 37(4): 377-399.
21. Othman, MR. 2011. The strength of Malaysian maritime cluster: The development of maritime policy. Ocean and Coastal Management, 54(8): 557-568.
22. Jenssen, JI and Randøy, T. 2006. The performance effect of innovation in shipping companies. Maritime Policy & Management, 33(4): 327-343.
23. Knarvik, KHM and Steen, F. 1999. Self-reinforcing agglomerations? An empirical industry study. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 101(4): 515-532.
24. Benito, GRG, Berger, E and Forest, M. 2003. A cluster analysis of the maritime sector in Norway. International Journal of Transport Management, 1(4): 203-215.
25. UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE ON TRADE AND DEVELOPMENT, 1992, Port marketing and the challenge of the third generation port. Trade and development board committee on shipping ad hoc intergovernmental group of port experts. Geneva, UNCTAD, 13-23
26. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. 1999. The fourth generation port. UNCTAD Ports Newsletter, 19: 9-12.
27. Cetin, CK and Cerit, AG. 2010. Organizational effectiveness at seaports: A systems approach. Maritime Policy & Management, 37(2): 195-219.
28. Consultants, Maunsell. 2003. Study to Strengthen Hong Kong's Role as an International Maritime Centre, Hong Kong: Hong Kong Port and Maritime Board.
29. LAM, J. S. L. and CULLINANE, K., 2003, Shanghai as an international maritime centre: Implications for the East Asian regional economy. In Proceedings of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, Vol. 4, October-November, Fukuoka, Japan, pp. 288-301
30. NIJDAM, M. H. and DE LANGEN, P. W., 2003, Leader Firms in the Dutch Maritime Cluster. European Regional Science Association 2003 Congress, Jyväskylä, Finland, August
31. Janssen, H. 2006. "The Dutch maritime cluster". In Dynamic European Maritime Clusters, Edited by: Wijnolst, N. 105-115. Delft, The Netherlands: IOS Press.
32. WIJNOLST, N. (ed), 2006, Dynamic European Maritime Clusters (Delft, The Netherlands: IOS Press)
33. Wong, P-K, Ho, Y-P and Singh, A. 2008. "Industrial cluster development and innovation in Singapore". In From Agglomeration to Innovation: Upgrading Industrial Clusters in Emerging Economies, Edited by: Kuchiki, A. and Tsuji, M. 50-116. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
34. Wang, JJ and Cheng, MC. 2010. From a hub port city to a global supply chain management center: A case study of Hong Kong. Journal of Transport Geography, 18(1): 104-115.
35. Brownrigg, M. 2006. "The United Kingdom's maritime cluster". In Dynamic European Maritime Clusters, Edited by: Wijnolst, N. 93-103. Delft, The Netherlands: IOS Press.
36. THE UNCTAD SECRETARIAT, 2010, Review of Maritime Transport 2010. UNCTAD/RMT/2010
37. THE UNCTAD SECRETARIAT, 2011, Review of Maritime Transport 2011. UNCTAD/RMT/2011
38. PISTORIUS, C. W. I. and UTTERBACK, J. M., 1996, A Lotka--Volterra model for multi-mode technological interaction: Modeling competition, symbiosis and predator-prey modes. Working papers (3929-96), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management
39. Pistorius, CWI and Utterback, JM. 1997. Multi-mode interaction among technologies. Research Policy, 26(1): 67-84.
40. Lee, S-J, Lee, D-J and Oh, H-S. 2005. Technological forecasting at the Korean stock market: A dynamic competition analysis using Lotka--Volterra model. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 72(8): 1044-1057.
41. Kim, J, Lee, D-J and Ahn, J. 2006. A dynamic competition analysis on the Korean mobile phone market using competitive diffusion model. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 51(1): 174-182.
42. Tsai, B-H and Li, Y. 2009. Cluster evolution of IC industry from Taiwan to China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(8): 1092-1104.
43. Sandén, BA and Hillman, KM. 2011. A framework for analysis of multi-mode interaction among technologies with examples from the history of alternative transport fuels in Sweden. Research Policy, 40(3): 403-414.
44. Campbell, NA. 1996. Biology, 4th, 1122, 1133Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Co.
45. Morin, PJ. 1999. Community Ecology, Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell Press.
46. Douglas, AE. 2010. The Symbiotic Habit, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
47. Pianca, ER. 1983. Evolutionary Ecology, London: Harper & Row.
48. Brittain, JW and Wholey, DR. 1988. "Competition and coexistence in organizational communities: Population dynamics in electronic component manufacturing". In Ecological Models of Organizations, Edited by: Carroll, G. R. 195-222. Cambridge: Ballinger, Publishing Co.
49. Modis, T. 1999. Technological forecasting at the stock market. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 62(3): 173-202.
50. Morris, SA and Pratt, D. 2003. Analysis of the Lotka--Volterra competition equations as a technological substitution model. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 70(2): 103-133.
51. Watanabe, C, Kondo, R, Ouchi, N and Wei, H. 2004. A substitution orbit model of competitive. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 71(4): 365-390.
52. Chiang, S-Y. 2012. An application of Lotka-Volterra model to Taiwan's transition from 200 mm to 300 mm silicon wafers. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(2): 383-392.
53. Tansley, AG. 1935. The use and abuse of vegetational terms and concepts. Ecology, 16(3): 284-307.
54. Molles, MC. 1999. Ecology: Concepts and Applications, 482Boston, MA: WCB/McGraw-Hill.
55. Chapin, FS, Pamela, AM and Harold, AM. 2002. Principles of Terrestrial Ecosystem Ecology, 380New York, NY: Springer.
56. Schulze, E-D, Erwin, B and Klaus, M-H. 2005. Plant Ecology, 400Berlin, Germany: Springer.
57. Gurevitch, J, Samuel, MS and Gordon, AF. 2006. The Ecology of Plants, 2nd, 522Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
58. Smith, TM and Smith, RL. 2012. Elements of Ecology, 8th, Boston, MA: Benjamin Cummings.
59. Miles, DB and Dunham, AE. 1993. Historical perspectives in ecology and evolutionary biology: The use of phylogenetic comparative analyses. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 24: 587-619.
60. Cracraft, J and Donoghue, MJ. 2005. Assembling the Tree of Life, 592Oxford: Oxford University Press.
61. Darwin, CR. 1859. On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life, 1st, London: John Murray.
62. Kimura, M. 1991. The neutral theory of molecular evolution: A review of recent evidence. The Japanese Journal of Genetics, 66(4): 367-386.
63. MARITIME LONDON, 2012.http://maritimelondon.com/ml_home_overview.htm
64. MARITIME AND PORT AUTHORITY OF SINGAPORE (MPA), 2009.http://www.mpa.gov.sg/sites/global_navigation/maritime_singapore.page
65. INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL SERVICES LONDON, 2011, Maritime services, City Business Series
66. Conrad, M. 1983. Adaptability, the Significance of Variability from Molecule to Ecosystem, New York, NY: Plenum Press.
67. Bazykin, AD. 1998. "Nonlinear dynamics of interacting populations". In World Scientific Series on Nonlinear Science Series A, Edited by: Khibnik, A. I. and Krauskopf, B. Vol. 11, 101-116. Singapore, River Edge, NJ: World Scientific Publishing.
68. Martinez-budria, R, Diaz-armas, R, Navarro-ibanez, M and Ravelo-mesa, T. 1999. A study of the efficiency of Spanish port authorities using Data Envelopment Analysis. International Journal of Transport Economics, 26(2): 237-253.
69. Barros, CP and Athanassiou, M. 2004. Efficiency in European seaports with DEA: Evidence from Greece and Portugal. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 6(2): 122-140.
70. Leslie, PH. 1958. A stochastic model for studying the properties of certain biological systems by numerical methods. Biometrika, 45(1/2): 16-31.
71. THE STATE COUNCIL OF CHINA, 2009.http://www.gov.cn/zwgk/2009-04/29/content_1299428.htm